These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16454312)

  • 21. English compound versus non-compound noun phrases in discourse: an acoustic and perceptual study.
    Farnetani E; Torsello CT; Cosi P
    Lang Speech; 1988; 31 ( Pt 2)():157-80. PubMed ID: 3256771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Production and perception of clear speech in Croatian and English.
    Smiljanić R; Bradlow AR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Sep; 118(3 Pt 1):1677-88. PubMed ID: 16240826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Measures of spectral change and their application to habitual, slow, and clear speaking modes.
    Rosen KM; Folker JE; Murdoch BE; Vogel AP; Cahill LM; Delatycki MB; Corben LA
    Int J Speech Lang Pathol; 2011 Apr; 13(2):165-73. PubMed ID: 21054233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Intelligibility of conversational and clear speech in noise and reverberation for listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
    Payton KL; Uchanski RM; Braida LD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Mar; 95(3):1581-92. PubMed ID: 8176061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Speaking rates of American and New Zealand varieties of English.
    Robb MP; Maclagan MA; Chen Y
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2004; 18(1):1-15. PubMed ID: 15053265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Making predictable unpredictable with style - Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence for the critical role of prosodic expectations in the perception of prominence in speech.
    Kakouros S; Salminen N; Räsänen O
    Neuropsychologia; 2018 Jan; 109():181-199. PubMed ID: 29247667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Key word signing: perceived and acoustic differences between signed and spoken narratives.
    Windsor J; Fristoe M
    J Speech Hear Res; 1991 Apr; 34(2):260-8. PubMed ID: 2046350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Whispering by Individuals Using Tracheoesophageal Speech.
    Searl J
    J Voice; 2018 Jan; 32(1):127.e1-127.e13. PubMed ID: 28527540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Imprecise vowel articulation as a potential early marker of Parkinson's disease: effect of speaking task.
    Rusz J; Cmejla R; Tykalova T; Ruzickova H; Klempir J; Majerova V; Picmausova J; Roth J; Ruzicka E
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Sep; 134(3):2171-81. PubMed ID: 23967947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Stimulus variability and the phonetic relevance hypothesis: effects of variability in speaking style, fundamental frequency, and speaking rate on spoken word identification.
    Sommers MS; Barcroft J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Apr; 119(4):2406-16. PubMed ID: 16642853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. How do listeners time response articulation when answering questions? The role of speech rate.
    Corps RE; Gambi C; Pickering MJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Apr; 46(4):781-802. PubMed ID: 31556641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Cognitive-perceptual examination of remediation approaches to hypokinetic dysarthria.
    McAuliffe MJ; Kerr SE; Gibson EM; Anderson T; LaShell PJ
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2014 Aug; 57(4):1268-83. PubMed ID: 24687031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. How the listener integrates the components of speaking rate.
    Grosjean F; Lane H
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1976 Nov; 2(4):538-43. PubMed ID: 1011003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Altering context speech rate can cause words to appear or disappear.
    Dilley LC; Pitt MA
    Psychol Sci; 2010 Nov; 21(11):1664-70. PubMed ID: 20876883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effect of speaking rate on the identification of word boundaries.
    Schwab S; Miller JL; Grosjean F; Mondini M
    Phonetica; 2008; 65(3):173-86. PubMed ID: 18679044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Listener sensitivity to individual talker differences in voice-onset-time.
    Allen JS; Miller JL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Jun; 115(6):3171-83. PubMed ID: 15237841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A comparative study of adolescents' perceptions of normal-speaking and dysarthric children.
    Lass NJ; Ruscello DM; Harkins KE; Blankenship BL
    J Commun Disord; 1993 Apr; 26(1):3-12. PubMed ID: 8340489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The effects of articulation on the perceived loudness of the projected voice.
    Myers BR; Finnegan EM
    J Voice; 2015 May; 29(3):390.e9-15. PubMed ID: 25770375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Short-term release cues to stop-consonant place of articulation in child speech.
    Chapin C; Tseng C; Lieberman P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1982 Jan; 71(1):179-86. PubMed ID: 7054247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. How hearing aids, background noise, and visual cues influence objective listening effort.
    Picou EM; Ricketts TA; Hornsby BW
    Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):e52-64. PubMed ID: 23416751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.