These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16454341)

  • 41. Intravital Computer Morphometry on Protozoa: A Method for Monitoring of the Morphofunctional Disorders in Cells Exposed in the Cell Phone Communication Electromagnetic Field.
    Uskalova DV; Igolkina YV; Sarapultseva EI
    Bull Exp Biol Med; 2016 Aug; 161(4):554-7. PubMed ID: 27591872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Use of portable exposure meters for comparing mobile phone base station radiation in different types of areas in the cities of Basel and Amsterdam.
    Urbinello D; Huss A; Beekhuizen J; Vermeulen R; Röösli M
    Sci Total Environ; 2014 Jan; 468-469():1028-33. PubMed ID: 24091124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Determination of the general public exposure around GSM and UMTS base stations.
    Bornkessel C; Schubert M; Wuschek M; Schmidt P
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 124(1):40-7. PubMed ID: 17933788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Outdoor radiofrequency radiation levels in the West Bank-Palestine.
    Lahham A; Hammash A
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 May; 149(4):399-402. PubMed ID: 21835841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. [Methods of comparative evaluation of portable communication systems: Russian and international approaches].
    Perov SIu; Bogacheva EV
    Med Tr Prom Ekol; 2012; (3):36-40. PubMed ID: 22702135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. [Biologic effects and hygienic regulation of electromagnetic fields caused by mobile communication devices].
    Suvorov GA; Pal'tsev IuP; Rubtsova NB; Pokhodzeĭ LV; Lazarenko NV; Kleshchenok OI; Petrova LP; Loshchilov IuA; Sterlikov AV; Romanov VA; Gavrish NN
    Med Tr Prom Ekol; 2002; (9):10-8. PubMed ID: 12412335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Biological responses of mobile phone frequency exposure.
    Behari J
    Indian J Exp Biol; 2010 Oct; 48(10):959-81. PubMed ID: 21299039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Exposure to non-ionizing electromagnetic radiation from mobile telephony and the association with psychiatric symptoms.
    Silva DF; Barros WR; Almeida Mda C; Rêgo MA
    Cad Saude Publica; 2015 Oct; 31(10):2110-26. PubMed ID: 26735379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. National surveys of radiofrequency field strengths from radio base stations in Africa.
    Joyner KH; Van Wyk MJ; Rowley JT
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2014; 158(3):251-62. PubMed ID: 24044904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Residential exposure to radiofrequency fields from mobile phone base stations, and broadcast transmitters: a population-based survey with personal meter.
    Viel JF; Clerc S; Barrera C; Rymzhanova R; Moissonnier M; Hours M; Cardis E
    Occup Environ Med; 2009 Aug; 66(8):550-6. PubMed ID: 19336431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Evaluation of Electromagnetic Fields in a Hospital for Safe Use of Electronic Medical Equipment.
    Ishida K; Fujioka T; Endo T; Hosokawa R; Fujisaki T; Yoshino R; Hirose M
    J Med Syst; 2016 Mar; 40(3):46. PubMed ID: 26643076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. The effect of Base Transceiver Station waves on some immunological and hematological factors in exposed persons.
    Taheri M; Roshanaei G; Ghaffari J; Rahimnejad S; Khosroshahi BN; Aliabadi M; Eftekharian MM
    Hum Antibodies; 2017; 25(1-2):31-37. PubMed ID: 27911288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Exposure of farm workers to electromagnetic radiation from cellular network radio base stations situated on rural agricultural land.
    Pascuzzi S; Santoro F
    Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2015; 21(3):351-8. PubMed ID: 26647953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. [Electormagnetic field of the mobile phone base station: case study].
    Bieńkowski P; Zubrzak B; Surma R
    Med Pr; 2011; 62(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 21748882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Mobile phones are given the all clear by UK group.
    Wise J
    BMJ; 2014 Feb; 348():g1477. PubMed ID: 24518854
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Electrosmog and species conservation.
    Balmori A
    Sci Total Environ; 2014 Oct; 496():314-316. PubMed ID: 25089692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. [Electromagnetic fields: damage to health due to the nocebo effect].
    Bonneux L
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2007 Apr; 151(17):953-6. PubMed ID: 17520846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. [Development of innovative methods of electromagnetic field evaluation for portable radio-station].
    Rubtsova NB; Perov SIu; Bogacheva EV; Kuster N
    Med Tr Prom Ekol; 2013; (2):9-13. PubMed ID: 23785811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Electromagnetic field pattern in the environment of GSM base stations.
    Aniołczyk H
    Int J Occup Med Environ Health; 1999; 12(1):47-58. PubMed ID: 10360084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Electromagnetic fields from mobile phone base station - variability analysis.
    Bienkowski P; Zubrzak B
    Electromagn Biol Med; 2015 Sep; 34(3):257-61. PubMed ID: 26444202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.