These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16454546)
1. Significance of field validation in the interlaboratory comparison program in cervicovaginal cytology. Oxley DK Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2006 Feb; 130(2):144; author reply 144-5. PubMed ID: 16454546 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Measuring the significance of field validation in the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program in Cervicovaginal Cytology: how good are the experts? Renshaw AA; Wang E; Mody DR; Wilbur DC; Davey DD; Colgan TJ; Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2005 May; 129(5):609-13. PubMed ID: 15859630 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. How expert are the experts? Implications for proficiency testing in cervicovaginal cytology. Ducatman BS; Ducatman AM Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2005 May; 129(5):604-5. PubMed ID: 15859628 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Measuring the significance of participant evaluation of acceptability of cases in the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program in cervicovaginal cytology. Renshaw AA; Mody DR; Wang E; Wilbur DC; Colgan TJ; Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2005 Sep; 129(9):1093-6. PubMed ID: 16119978 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The potential for failure in gynecologic regulatory proficiency testing with current slide validation criteria: results from the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison in Gynecologic Cytology Program. ; Young NA; Moriarty AT; Walsh MK; Wang E; Wilbur DC Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2006 Aug; 130(8):1114-8. PubMed ID: 16879010 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Robustness of validation criteria in the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program in Cervicovaginal Cytology. Renshaw AA; Walsh MK; Blond B; Moriarty AT; Mody DR; Colgan TJ; Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2006 Aug; 130(8):1119-22. PubMed ID: 16879011 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cytologic features of squamous cell carcinoma in conventional smears: comparison of cases that performed poorly with those that performed well in the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program in cervicovaginal cytology. Renshaw AA; Henry MR; Birdsong GG; Wang E; Haja J; Hughes JH Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2005 Sep; 129(9):1097-9. PubMed ID: 16119979 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cytologic features of adenocarcinoma, not otherwise specified, in conventional smears: comparison of cases that performed poorly with those that performed well in the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program in cervicovaginal cytology. Renshaw AA; Schwartz MR; Wang E; Haja J; Hughes JH Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2006 Jan; 130(1):23-6. PubMed ID: 16390233 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cytopathology laboratory improvement programs of the College of American Pathologists: Laboratory Accreditation Program (CAP LAP) and Performance Improvement Program in Cervicovaginal Cytology (CAP PAP). Nielsen ML Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 Mar; 121(3):256-9. PubMed ID: 9111112 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Performance of herpes simplex challenges in proficiency testing: observations from the College of American Pathologists proficiency testing program. Moriarty AT; Darragh TM; Souers R; Fatheree LA; Wilbur DC Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2009 Sep; 133(9):1379-82. PubMed ID: 19722743 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bethesda 2001 implementation and reporting rates: 2003 practices of participants in the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program in Cervicovaginal Cytology. Davey DD; Neal MH; Wilbur DC; Colgan TJ; Styer PE; Mody DR Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2004 Nov; 128(11):1224-9. PubMed ID: 15504056 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Internal quality assurance in cervical cytology one laboratory's experience. Cross PA Cytopathology; 1996 Feb; 7(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 8833871 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Appeals in gynecologic cytology proficiency testing: review and analysis of data from the 2006 College of American Pathologists gynecologic cytology proficiency testing program. Crothers BA; Moriarty AT; Fatheree LA; Booth CN; Tench WD; Wilbur DC; Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2009 Jan; 133(1):44-8. PubMed ID: 19123735 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Automatic failure in gynecologic cytology proficiency testing. Results from the College of American Pathologists proficiency testing program. Moriarty AT; Crothers BA; Bentz JS; Souers RJ; Fatheree LA; Wilbur DC Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2009 Nov; 133(11):1757-60. PubMed ID: 19886708 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. College of American Pathologists Conference XXX on quality and liability issues with the Papanicolaou smear: summation. Austin RM Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 Mar; 121(3):341-2. PubMed ID: 9111131 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Cervical Cytology Practice Guidelines. American Society of Cytopathology. Cortese C; Acta Cytol; 2001; 45(2):201-26. PubMed ID: 11284307 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Quality assurance activities of the College of American Pathologists. Kraemer BB Acta Cytol; 1989; 33(4):434-8. PubMed ID: 2750430 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The confused pathology expert: the ongoing challenge of monitoring physician expert witness testimony. Austin RM; McCoy DR Diagn Cytopathol; 2007 Dec; 35(12):749-55. PubMed ID: 18008344 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Quality assurance in cytopathology. Recommendations and ongoing quality assurance activities of the American Society of Clinical Pathologists. Bonfiglio TA Acta Cytol; 1989; 33(4):431-3. PubMed ID: 2750429 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]