813 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16455202)
1. Evaluation of a bi-layer wound dressing for burn care. II. In vitro and in vivo bactericidal properties.
Martineau L; Shek PN
Burns; 2006 Mar; 32(2):172-9. PubMed ID: 16455202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of a bi-layer wound dressing for burn care I. Cooling and wound healing properties.
Martineau L; Shek PN
Burns; 2006 Feb; 32(1):70-6. PubMed ID: 16380216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Controlling methicillin resistant Staphyloccocus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa wound infections with a novel biomaterial.
Martineau L; Davis SC; Peng HT; Hung A
J Invest Surg; 2007; 20(4):217-27. PubMed ID: 17710602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of cytotoxicity and antimicrobial activity of Acticoat Burn Dressing for management of microbial contamination in cultured skin substitutes grafted to athymic mice.
Supp AP; Neely AN; Supp DM; Warden GD; Boyce ST
J Burn Care Rehabil; 2005; 26(3):238-46. PubMed ID: 15879745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. In vitro bactericidal efficacy of a new sun- and heat burn gel.
Martineau L; Dosch HM
Burns; 2006 Sep; 32(6):748-54. PubMed ID: 16920268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Suprathel-acetic acid matrix versus acticoat and aquacel as an antiseptic dressing: an in vitro study.
Ryssel H; Germann G; Riedel K; Reichenberger M; Hellmich S; Kloeters O
Ann Plast Surg; 2010 Oct; 65(4):391-5. PubMed ID: 20798627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Experimental study on the antibacterial effects of zirconium phosphate gauze loaded with silver on the common bacteria on rat burn wound].
Tang J; Wu J; Yi SX; Wang RP; Wang XH; Ma B; Yuan J; Chen XW
Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi; 2004 Dec; 20(6):333-5. PubMed ID: 15730677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Antibacterial effect of dressings containing multivalent silver ion carried by zirconium phosphate on experimental rat burn wounds.
Luo G; Tang J; He W; Wu J; Ma B; Wang X; Chen X; Yi S; Zhang X; Li X; Fitzgerald M
Wound Repair Regen; 2008; 16(6):800-4. PubMed ID: 19128251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of a novel, antimicrobial dressing on in vivo, Pseudomonas aeruginosa wound biofilm: quantitative comparative analysis using a rabbit ear model.
Seth AK; Zhong A; Nguyen KT; Hong SJ; Leung KP; Galiano RD; Mustoe TA
Wound Repair Regen; 2014; 22(6):712-9. PubMed ID: 25230854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of silver-coated dressing (Acticoat), chlorhexidine acetate 0.5% (Bactigrass), and fusidic acid 2% (Fucidin) for topical antibacterial effect in methicillin-resistant Staphylococci-contaminated, full-skin thickness rat burn wounds.
Ulkür E; Oncul O; Karagoz H; Yeniz E; Celiköz B
Burns; 2005 Nov; 31(7):874-7. PubMed ID: 16011879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of silver-coated dressing (Acticoat®), chlorhexidine acetate 0.5% (Bactigrass®) and nystatin for topical antifungal effect in Candida albicans-contaminated, full-skin-thickness rat burn wounds.
Acar A; Uygur F; Diktaş H; Evinç R; Ulkür E; Oncül O; Görenek L
Burns; 2011 Aug; 37(5):882-5. PubMed ID: 21354707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Development of a chitosan-based wound dressing with improved hemostatic and antimicrobial properties.
Ong SY; Wu J; Moochhala SM; Tan MH; Lu J
Biomaterials; 2008 Nov; 29(32):4323-32. PubMed ID: 18708251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Use of a bioluminescent Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain within an in vitro microbiological system, as a model of wound infection, to assess the antimicrobial efficacy of wound dressings by monitoring light production.
Thorn RM; Nelson SM; Greenman J
Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 2007 Sep; 51(9):3217-24. PubMed ID: 17638701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Standardizing an in vitro procedure for the evaluation of the antimicrobial activity of wound dressings and the assessment of three wound dressings.
Tkachenko O; Karas JA
J Antimicrob Chemother; 2012 Jul; 67(7):1697-700. PubMed ID: 22514261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An ultrathin poly(L-lactic acid) nanosheet as a burn wound dressing for protection against bacterial infection.
Miyazaki H; Kinoshita M; Saito A; Fujie T; Kabata K; Hara E; Ono S; Takeoka S; Saitoh D
Wound Repair Regen; 2012; 20(4):573-9. PubMed ID: 22712440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Randomized controlled trial of the absorbency of four dressings and their effects on the evaporation of burn wounds.
Chen J; Han CM; Su GL; Tang ZJ; Su SJ; Lin XW
Chin Med J (Engl); 2007 Oct; 120(20):1788-91. PubMed ID: 18028772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of silver-coated dressing (Acticoat), chlorhexidine acetate 0.5% (Bactigrass), and silver sulfadiazine 1% (Silverdin) for topical antibacterial effect in Pseudomonas aeruginosa-contaminated, full-skin thickness burn wounds in rats.
Ulkür E; Oncül O; Karagöz H; Celiköz B; Cavuşlu S
J Burn Care Rehabil; 2005; 26(5):430-3. PubMed ID: 16151289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Antimicrobial dressings: Comparison of the ability of a panel of dressings to prevent biofilm formation by key burn wound pathogens.
Halstead FD; Rauf M; Bamford A; Wearn CM; Bishop JRB; Burt R; Fraise AP; Moiemen NS; Oppenheim BA; Webber MA
Burns; 2015 Dec; 41(8):1683-1694. PubMed ID: 26188884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Suprathel-antiseptic matrix: in vitro model for local antiseptic treatment?
Ryssel H; Andreas Radu C; Germann G; Kloeters O; Riedel K; Otte M; Kremer T
Adv Skin Wound Care; 2011 Feb; 24(2):64-7. PubMed ID: 21242734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of human acute wound fluid on the antibacterial efficacy of different antiseptic polyurethane foam dressings: An in vitro analysis.
Rembe JD; Fromm-Dornieden C; Böhm J; Stuermer EK
Wound Repair Regen; 2018 Jan; 26(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 29363857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
