These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16456633)

  • 1. Assessing the effects of alternative setback channel constraint scenarios employing a river meander migration model.
    Larsen EW; Girvetz EH; Fremier AK
    Environ Manage; 2006 Jun; 37(6):880-97. PubMed ID: 16456633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Modeling channel management impacts on river migration: a case study of Woodson bridge state recreation area, Sacramento river, California, USA.
    Larsen EW; Greco SE
    Environ Manage; 2002 Aug; 30(2):209-24. PubMed ID: 12105762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quantifying process-based mitigation strategies in historical context: separating multiple cumulative effects on river meander migration.
    Fremier AK; Girvetz EH; Greco SE; Larsen EW
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(6):e99736. PubMed ID: 24964145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A geomorphic explanation for a meander cutoff following channel relocation of a coarse-bedded river.
    Thompson DM
    Environ Manage; 2003 Mar; 31(3):385-400. PubMed ID: 12592454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Establishing a context for river rehabilitation, North Fork Gunnison River, Colorado.
    Jaquette C; Wohl E; Cooper D
    Environ Manage; 2005 May; 35(5):593-606. PubMed ID: 15886956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Whooping crane use of riverine stopover sites.
    Baasch DM; Farrell PD; Howlin S; Pearse AT; Farnsworth JM; Smith CB
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(1):e0209612. PubMed ID: 30625185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Initial adjustments within a new river channel: Interactions between fluvial processes, colonizing vegetation, and bank profile development.
    Gurnell AM; Morrissey IP; Boitsidis AJ; Bark T; Clifford NJ; Petts GE; Thompson K
    Environ Manage; 2006 Oct; 38(4):580-96. PubMed ID: 16933081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impacts of flow regulation on freshwater pearl mussel (Margaritifera margaritifera) habitat in a Scottish montane river.
    Addy S; Cooksley SL; Sime I
    Sci Total Environ; 2012 Aug; 432():318-28. PubMed ID: 22750177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A micro case study of the legal and administrative arrangements for river health in the Kangaroo River (NSW).
    Mooney C; Farrier D
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 45(11):161-8. PubMed ID: 12171348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessing the impact of changes in landuse and management practices on the diffuse pollution and retention of nitrate in a riparian floodplain.
    Krause S; Jacobs J; Voss A; Bronstert A; Zehe E
    Sci Total Environ; 2008 Jan; 389(1):149-64. PubMed ID: 17915291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impacts of land use conversion on bankfull discharge and mass wasting.
    Riedel MS; Verry ES; Brooks KN
    J Environ Manage; 2005 Sep; 76(4):326-37. PubMed ID: 15932785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Impacts of meander migration on the Amazon riverine communities using Landsat time series and cloud computing.
    Nagel GW; de Moraes Novo EML; Martins VS; Campos-Silva JV; Barbosa CCF; Bonnet MP
    Sci Total Environ; 2022 Feb; 806(Pt 2):150449. PubMed ID: 34597967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessing societal impacts when planning restoration of large alluvial rivers: a case study of the Sacramento River project, California.
    Golet GH; Roberts MD; Larsen EW; Luster RA; Unger R; Werner G; White GG
    Environ Manage; 2006 Jun; 37(6):862-79. PubMed ID: 16523370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Projecting cumulative benefits of multiple river restoration projects: an example from the Sacramento-San Joaquin River system in California.
    Kondolf GM; Angermeier PL; Cummins K; Dunne T; Healey M; Kimmerer W; Moyle PB; Murphy D; Patten D; Railsback S; Reed DJ; Spies R; Twiss R
    Environ Manage; 2008 Dec; 42(6):933-45. PubMed ID: 18810527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Optimizing the dammed: water supply losses and fish habitat gains from dam removal in California.
    Null SE; Medellín-Azuara J; Escriva-Bou A; Lent M; Lund JR
    J Environ Manage; 2014 Apr; 136():121-31. PubMed ID: 24594701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ecosystem approach to water resources management using the MIKE 11 modeling system in the Strymonas River and Lake Kerkini.
    Doulgeris C; Georgiou P; Papadimos D; Papamichail D
    J Environ Manage; 2012 Feb; 94(1):132-43. PubMed ID: 21924542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Landscape assessment of side channel plugs and associated cumulative side channel attrition across a large river floodplain.
    Reinhold AM; Poole GC; Bramblett RG; Zale AV; Roberts DW
    Environ Monit Assess; 2018 Apr; 190(5):305. PubMed ID: 29691714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The influence of riparian woody vegetation on bankfull alluvial river morphodynamics.
    Török GT; Parker G
    Sci Rep; 2022 Oct; 12(1):18141. PubMed ID: 36307439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A landscape perspective on bat foraging ecology along rivers: does channel confinement and insect availability influence the response of bats to aquatic resources in riverine landscapes?
    Hagen EM; Sabo JL
    Oecologia; 2011 Jul; 166(3):751-60. PubMed ID: 21274571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. River-aquifer interactions, geologic heterogeneity, and low-flow management.
    Fleckenstein JH; Niswonger RG; Fogg GE
    Ground Water; 2006; 44(6):837-52. PubMed ID: 17087756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.