These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16457174)

  • 1. Biomass characterization of laboratory-scale thermophilic-mesophilic wastewater treatment processes.
    Suvilampi J; Lehtomäki A; Rintala J
    Environ Technol; 2006 Jan; 27(1):41-51. PubMed ID: 16457174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparative study of laboratory-scale thermophilic and mesophilic activated sludge processes.
    Suvilampi J; Lehtomäki A; Rintala J
    Water Res; 2005 Mar; 39(5):741-50. PubMed ID: 15743618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor--a review.
    Bal AS; Dhagat NN
    Indian J Environ Health; 2001 Apr; 43(2):1-82. PubMed ID: 12397675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Pilot-scale comparison of thermophilic aerobic suspended carrier biofilm process and activated sludge process in pulp and paper mill effluent treatment.
    Suvilampi JE; Rintala JA
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(3):95-102. PubMed ID: 15461403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bioflocculation of mesophilic and thermophilic activated sludge.
    Vogelaar JC; De Keizer A; Spijker S; Lettinga G
    Water Res; 2005 Jan; 39(1):37-46. PubMed ID: 15607162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of laboratory-scale thermophilic biofilm and activated sludge processes integrated with a mesophilic activated sludge process.
    Suvilampi J; Lehtomäki A; Rintala J
    Bioresour Technol; 2003 Jul; 88(3):207-14. PubMed ID: 12618042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mesophilic and thermophilic biological post treatment of anaerobic pretreated paper process water in a closed cycle paper mill.
    Vogelaar JC; Van Lier JB; Klapwijk B; De Vries MC; Lettinga G
    Meded Rijksuniv Gent Fak Landbouwkd Toegep Biol Wet; 2001; 66(3a):119-27. PubMed ID: 15954571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Membrane bioreactor operation at short solids retention times: performance and biomass characteristics.
    Ng HY; Hermanowicz SW
    Water Res; 2005 Mar; 39(6):981-92. PubMed ID: 15766953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of SRT and temperature on biological conversions and the related scum-forming potential.
    Halalsheh M; Koppes J; den Elzen J; Zeeman G; Fayyad M; Lettinga G
    Water Res; 2005 Jul; 39(12):2475-82. PubMed ID: 15978650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic digestion of primary and secondary sludge. Effect of pre-treatment at elevated temperature.
    Gavala HN; Yenal U; Skiadas IV; Westermann P; Ahring BK
    Water Res; 2003 Nov; 37(19):4561-72. PubMed ID: 14568041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of sludge characteristics and performance of a submerged membrane bioreactor and an activated sludge process at high solids retention time.
    Massé A; Spérandio M; Cabassud C
    Water Res; 2006 Jul; 40(12):2405-15. PubMed ID: 16759682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mesophilic and thermophilic temperature co-phase anaerobic digestion compared with single-stage mesophilic- and thermophilic digestion of sewage sludge.
    Song YC; Kwon SJ; Woo JH
    Water Res; 2004 Apr; 38(7):1653-62. PubMed ID: 15026219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of continuous mesophilic, thermophilic and temperature phased anaerobic digestion of microwaved activated sludge.
    Coelho NM; Droste RL; Kennedy KJ
    Water Res; 2011 Apr; 45(9):2822-34. PubMed ID: 21470653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of solids retention time on structure and characteristics of sludge flocs in sequencing batch reactors.
    Liao BQ; Droppo IG; Leppard GG; Liss SN
    Water Res; 2006 Jul; 40(13):2583-91. PubMed ID: 16806396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of temperature and dissolved oxygen on sludge properties and their role in bioflocculation and settling.
    Liao BQ; Lin HJ; Langevin SP; Gao WJ; Leppard GG
    Water Res; 2011 Jan; 45(2):509-20. PubMed ID: 20875910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Upgrading of the anaerobic digestion of waste activated sludge by combining temperature-phased anaerobic digestion and intermediate ozonation.
    Kobayashi T; Li YY; Harada H; Yasui H; Noike T
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 59(1):185-93. PubMed ID: 19151501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Efficiency of autothermal thermophilic aerobic digestion and thermophilic anaerobic digestion of municipal wastewater sludge in removing Salmonella spp. and indicator bacteria.
    Zábranská J; Dohányos M; Jenícek P; Růziciková H; Vránová A
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 47(3):151-6. PubMed ID: 12639021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Biomass stabilization in the anaerobic digestion of wastewater sludges.
    Arnaiz C; Gutierrez JC; Lebrato J
    Bioresour Technol; 2006 Jul; 97(10):1179-84. PubMed ID: 16006121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The SBR and its biofilm application potentials.
    Wilderer PA; McSwain BS
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(10):1-10. PubMed ID: 15656289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A review of floc strength and breakage.
    Jarvis P; Jefferson B; Gregory J; Parsons SA
    Water Res; 2005 Sep; 39(14):3121-37. PubMed ID: 16000210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.