95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16457178)
1. An evaluation of variables affecting the stability and performance of down-flow anaerobic fixed bed reactors treating piggery wastewater.
Sánchez E; Borja R; Travieso L; Martín A; Colmenarejo MF; Nikolaeva S
Environ Technol; 2006 Jan; 27(1):85-93. PubMed ID: 16457178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Piggery waste treatment by using down-flow anaerobic fixed bed reactors.
Sánchez E; Travieso L; Borja R; Colmenarejo MF; Nikolaeva S; Raposo F; Rincón B
J Environ Sci Health B; 2007 Aug; 42(6):727-34. PubMed ID: 17701708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor--a review.
Bal AS; Dhagat NN
Indian J Environ Health; 2001 Apr; 43(2):1-82. PubMed ID: 12397675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of feed characteristics on the organic matter, nitrogen and phosphorus removal in an activated sludge system treating piggery slurry.
González C; García PA; Muñoz R
Water Sci Technol; 2009; 60(8):2145-52. PubMed ID: 19844061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of organic loading rate on the stability, operational parameters and performance of a secondary upflow anaerobic sludge bed reactor treating piggery waste.
Sánchez E; Borja R; Travieso L; Martín A; Colmenarejo MF
Bioresour Technol; 2005 Feb; 96(3):335-44. PubMed ID: 15474935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Coliform concentration reduction and related performance evaluation of a down-flow anaerobic fixed bed reactor treating low-strength saline wastewater.
Rovirosa N; Sánchez E; Cruz M; Veiga MC; Borja R
Bioresour Technol; 2004 Sep; 94(2):119-27. PubMed ID: 15158503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biological nitrogen removal using bio-sorbed internal organic carbon from piggery wastewater in a post-denitrification MLE process.
Park SM; Jun HB; Chung YJ; Lee SH
Water Sci Technol; 2004; 49(5-6):373-80. PubMed ID: 15137447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effect of operational conditions on the performance of UASB reactors for domestic wastewater treatment.
Leitão RC; Silva-Filho JA; Sanders W; van Haandel AC; Zeeman G; Lettinga G
Water Sci Technol; 2005; 52(1-2):299-305. PubMed ID: 16180442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Degradation of 4-chlorophenol in UASB reactor under methanogenic conditions.
Majumder PS; Gupta SK
Bioresour Technol; 2008 Jul; 99(10):4169-77. PubMed ID: 17928222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. SBR as a relevant technology to combine anaerobic digestion and denitrification in a single reactor.
Bernet N; Delgenès N; Delgenès JP; Moletta R
Water Sci Technol; 2001; 43(3):209-14. PubMed ID: 11381908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Start-up alternatives and performance of an UASB pilot plant treating diluted municipal wastewater at low temperature.
Alvarez JA; Ruiz I; Gómez M; Presas J; Soto M
Bioresour Technol; 2006 Sep; 97(14):1640-9. PubMed ID: 16171991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. High rate manure supernatant digestion.
Bergland WH; Dinamarca C; Toradzadegan M; Nordgård AS; Bakke I; Bakke R
Water Res; 2015 Jun; 76():1-9. PubMed ID: 25776915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Competition between planktonic and fixed microorganisms during the start-up of methanogenic biofilm reactors.
Cresson R; Escudié R; Steyer JP; Delgenès JP; Bernet N
Water Res; 2008 Feb; 42(3):792-800. PubMed ID: 17825351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Performance comparison of a continuous-flow stirred-tank reactor and an anaerobic sequencing batch reactor for fermentative hydrogen production depending on substrate concentration.
Kim SH; Han SK; Shin HS
Water Sci Technol; 2005; 52(10-11):23-9. PubMed ID: 16459773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Development of empirical models for performance evaluation of UASB reactors treating poultry manure wastewater under different operational conditions.
Yetilmezsoy K; Sakar S
J Hazard Mater; 2008 May; 153(1-2):532-43. PubMed ID: 17913349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Activated Sludge Model No. 1 calibration for piggery wastewater treatment using respirometry.
Boursier H; Béline F; Paul E
Water Sci Technol; 2004; 49(5-6):389-95. PubMed ID: 15137449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of cycle-frequency and temperature on the performance of anaerobic sequencing batch reactors (ASBRs) treating swine waste.
Ndegwa PM; Hamilton DW; Lalman JA; Cumba HJ
Bioresour Technol; 2008 Apr; 99(6):1972-80. PubMed ID: 17532625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Performance of a UASB-digester system treating domestic wastewater.
Alvarez JA; Armstrong E; Presas J; Gómez M; Soto M
Environ Technol; 2004 Oct; 25(10):1189-99. PubMed ID: 15551833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Potential for methane production from anaerobic co-digestion of swine manure with winery wastewater.
Riaño B; Molinuevo B; García-González MC
Bioresour Technol; 2011 Mar; 102(5):4131-6. PubMed ID: 21232936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Performance of the ANAMMOX process using multi- and single-fed upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactors.
Xing BS; Qin TY; Chen SX; Zhang J; Guo LX; Jin RC
Bioresour Technol; 2013 Dec; 149():310-7. PubMed ID: 24121373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
