These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16457673)

  • 1. Comparison of curved canals preparations using profile, GT and Hero 642 rotary files.
    Garip Y; Gençoğlu N
    J Oral Rehabil; 2006 Feb; 33(2):131-6. PubMed ID: 16457673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [In vitro comparison of root canal preparation with step-back technique and GT rotary file--a nickel-titanium engine driven rotary instrument system].
    Krajczár K; Tóth V; Nyárády Z; Szabó G
    Fogorv Sz; 2005 Jun; 98(3):119-23. PubMed ID: 16108416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Shaping ability of two rotary instruments in simulated canals: stainless steel ENDOflash and nickel-titanium HERO Shaper.
    Perez F; Schoumacher M; Peli JF
    Int Endod J; 2005 Sep; 38(9):637-44. PubMed ID: 16104977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Canal preparation with Hero 642 rotary Ni-Ti instruments compared with stainless steel hand K-file assessed using computed tomography.
    Taşdemir T; Aydemir H; Inan U; Unal O
    Int Endod J; 2005 Jun; 38(6):402-8. PubMed ID: 15910476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative evaluation of the preparation efficacies of HERO Shaper and Nitiflex root canal instruments in curved root canals.
    Kaptan F; Sert S; Kayahan B; Haznedaroğlu F; Tanalp J; Bayirli G
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2005 Nov; 100(5):636-42. PubMed ID: 16243253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of the root dentine cutting effectiveness of the HERO 642, HERO Apical and HERO Shaper rotary systems.
    Câmara AC; Aguiar CM; de Figueiredo JA
    Aust Endod J; 2008 Dec; 34(3):94-100. PubMed ID: 19032642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of different types of automated devices on the shaping ability of rotary nickel-titanium FlexMaster instruments.
    Schäfer E; Erler M; Dammaschke T
    Int Endod J; 2005 Sep; 38(9):627-36. PubMed ID: 16104976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Shaping ability of ProFile and K3 rotary Ni-Ti instruments when used in a variable tip sequence in simulated curved root canals.
    Ayar LR; Love RM
    Int Endod J; 2004 Sep; 37(9):593-601. PubMed ID: 15317562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of instrument-centering ability within the root canal for three contemporary instrumentation techniques.
    Song YL; Bian Z; Fan B; Fan MW; Gutmann JL; Peng B
    Int Endod J; 2004 Apr; 37(4):265-71. PubMed ID: 15056353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of shaping ability of RaCe and Hero Shaper instruments in simulated curved canals.
    Aydin C; Inan U; Yasar S; Bulucu B; Tunca YM
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Mar; 105(3):e92-7. PubMed ID: 18280956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparative study of Endoflare-Hero Shaper and Mtwo NiTi instruments in the preparation of curved root canals.
    Veltri M; Mollo A; Mantovani L; Pini P; Balleri P; Grandini S
    Int Endod J; 2005 Sep; 38(9):610-6. PubMed ID: 16104974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effectiveness of HERO 642 versus Hedström files for removing gutta-percha fillings in curved root canals: an ex vivo study.
    Aydin B; Köse T; Calişkan MK
    Int Endod J; 2009 Nov; 42(11):1050-6. PubMed ID: 19825041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of root canal preparation with two rotary NiTi instruments: ProFile .04 and GT Rotary.
    Rödig T; Hülsmann M; Kahlmeier C
    Int Endod J; 2007 Jul; 40(7):553-62. PubMed ID: 17511784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparative investigation of 2 rotary nickel-titanium instruments: protaper universal versus protaper.
    Unal GC; Maden M; Savgat A; Onur Orhan E
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Jun; 107(6):886-92. PubMed ID: 19386519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Shaping ability of progressive versus constant taper instruments in simulated root canals.
    Yang GB; Zhou XD; Zhang H; Wu HK
    Int Endod J; 2006 Oct; 39(10):791-9. PubMed ID: 16948665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The shaping effects of three nickel-titanium rotary instruments on preparing curved canals in posterior teeth.
    Wei X; Ling J; Zhang S
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2002 Sep; 37(5):333-5. PubMed ID: 12425841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of molar root canal preparation using stainless-steel and nickel-titanium instruments.
    Carvalho LA; Bonetti I; Borges MA
    J Endod; 1999 Dec; 25(12):807-10. PubMed ID: 10726526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effectiveness of two nickel-titanium rotary instruments and a hand file for removing gutta-percha in severely curved root canals during retreatment: an ex vivo study.
    Gergi R; Sabbagh C
    Int Endod J; 2007 Jul; 40(7):532-7. PubMed ID: 17511787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of the canal centering ability of ProFile, K3, and RaCe Nickel Titanium rotary systems.
    Al-Sudani D; Al-Shahrani S
    J Endod; 2006 Dec; 32(12):1198-201. PubMed ID: 17174683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effectiveness of a hand file and three nickel-titanium rotary instruments for removing gutta-percha in curved root canals during retreatment.
    Schirrmeister JF; Wrbas KT; Schneider FH; Altenburger MJ; Hellwig E
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Apr; 101(4):542-7. PubMed ID: 16545721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.