91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16458782)
1. Monte Carlo-based dosimetry of head-and-neck patients treated with SIB-IMRT.
Sakthi N; Keall P; Mihaylov I; Wu Q; Wu Y; Williamson JF; Schmidt-Ullrich R; Siebers JV
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Mar; 64(3):968-77. PubMed ID: 16458782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of patient setup errors on simultaneously integrated boost head and neck IMRT treatment plans.
Siebers JV; Keall PJ; Wu Q; Williamson JF; Schmidt-Ullrich RK
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Oct; 63(2):422-33. PubMed ID: 16168835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The next step in patient-specific QA: 3D dose verification of conformal and intensity-modulated RT based on EPID dosimetry and Monte Carlo dose calculations.
van Elmpt W; Nijsten S; Mijnheer B; Dekker A; Lambin P
Radiother Oncol; 2008 Jan; 86(1):86-92. PubMed ID: 18054102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical comparison of head and neck and prostate IMRT plans using absorbed dose to medium and absorbed dose to water.
Dogan N; Siebers JV; Keall PJ
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Oct; 51(19):4967-80. PubMed ID: 16985281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. IMRT head and neck treatment planning with a commercially available Monte Carlo based planning system.
Boudreau C; Heath E; Seuntjens J; Ballivy O; Parker W
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(5):879-90. PubMed ID: 15798262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The dosimetric effects of tissue heterogeneities in intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) of the head and neck.
Al-Hallaq HA; Reft CS; Roeske JC
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Mar; 51(5):1145-56. PubMed ID: 16481684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. High density dental materials and radiotherapy planning: comparison of the dose predictions using superposition algorithm and fluence map Monte Carlo method with radiochromic film measurements.
Spirydovich S; Papiez L; Langer M; Sandison G; Thai V
Radiother Oncol; 2006 Dec; 81(3):309-14. PubMed ID: 17113666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dosimetric verification for intensity-modulated radiotherapy of thoracic cancers using experimental and Monte Carlo approaches.
Jang SY; Liu HH; Wang X; Vassiliev ON; Siebers JV; Dong L; Mohan R
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Nov; 66(3):939-48. PubMed ID: 17011466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Improving IMRT dose accuracy via deliverable Monte Carlo optimization for the treatment of head and neck cancer patients.
Dogan N; Siebers JV; Keall PJ; Lerma F; Wu Y; Fatyga M; Williamson JF; Schmidt-Ullrich RK
Med Phys; 2006 Nov; 33(11):4033-43. PubMed ID: 17153383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Experimental measurements and Monte Carlo simulations for dosimetric evaluations of intrafraction motion for gated and ungated intensity modulated arc therapy deliveries.
Oliver M; Gladwish A; Staruch R; Craig J; Gaede S; Chen J; Wong E
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Nov; 53(22):6419-36. PubMed ID: 18941277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Monte Carlo dose verification of prostate patients treated with simultaneous integrated boost intensity modulated radiation therapy.
Dogan N; Mihaylov I; Wu Y; Keall PJ; Siebers JV; Hagan MP
Radiat Oncol; 2009 Jun; 4():18. PubMed ID: 19527515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of inhomogeneity correction algorithm in intensity-modulated radiotherapy of head-and-neck tumors.
Yoon M; Lee DH; Shin D; Lee SB; Park SY; Cho KH
Med Dosim; 2007; 32(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 17317535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of dose prediction errors and optimization convergence errors of deliverable-based head-and-neck IMRT plans computed with a superposition/convolution dose algorithm.
Mihaylov IB; Siebers JV
Med Phys; 2008 Aug; 35(8):3722-7. PubMed ID: 18777931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison of Monte Carlo and Fermi-Eyges-Hogstrom estimates of heart and lung dose from breast electron boost treatment.
Coleman J; Park C; Villarreal-Barajas JE; Petti P; Faddegon B
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Feb; 61(2):621-8. PubMed ID: 15667984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dosimetric comparison between 2-dimensional radiation therapy and intensity modulated radiation therapy in treatment of advanced T-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma: to treat less or more in the planning organ-at-risk volume of the brainstem and spinal cord.
Chau RM; Teo PM; Kam MK; Leung SF; Cheung KY; Chan AT
Med Dosim; 2007; 32(4):263-70. PubMed ID: 17980826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of dose engine accuracy on the optimum dose distribution in intensity-modulated proton therapy treatment plans.
Soukup M; Alber M
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Feb; 52(3):725-40. PubMed ID: 17228117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) dosimetry of the head and neck: a comparison of treatment plans using linear accelerator-based IMRT and helical tomotherapy.
Sheng K; Molloy JA; Read PW
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Jul; 65(3):917-23. PubMed ID: 16751074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Treatment plan comparison between helical tomotherapy and MLC-based IMRT using radiobiological measures.
Mavroidis P; Ferreira BC; Shi C; Lind BK; Papanikolaou N
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(13):3817-36. PubMed ID: 17664579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Patient-specific dosimetry of conventional and intensity modulated radiation therapy using a novel full Monte Carlo phase space reconstruction method from electronic portal images.
Jarry G; Verhaegen F
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Apr; 52(8):2277-99. PubMed ID: 17404469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy dose prescription, recording, and delivery: patterns of variability among institutions and treatment planning systems.
Das IJ; Cheng CW; Chopra KL; Mitra RK; Srivastava SP; Glatstein E
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 Mar; 100(5):300-7. PubMed ID: 18314476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
