These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Effect of patient setup errors on simultaneously integrated boost head and neck IMRT treatment plans. Siebers JV; Keall PJ; Wu Q; Williamson JF; Schmidt-Ullrich RK Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Oct; 63(2):422-33. PubMed ID: 16168835 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The next step in patient-specific QA: 3D dose verification of conformal and intensity-modulated RT based on EPID dosimetry and Monte Carlo dose calculations. van Elmpt W; Nijsten S; Mijnheer B; Dekker A; Lambin P Radiother Oncol; 2008 Jan; 86(1):86-92. PubMed ID: 18054102 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical comparison of head and neck and prostate IMRT plans using absorbed dose to medium and absorbed dose to water. Dogan N; Siebers JV; Keall PJ Phys Med Biol; 2006 Oct; 51(19):4967-80. PubMed ID: 16985281 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. IMRT head and neck treatment planning with a commercially available Monte Carlo based planning system. Boudreau C; Heath E; Seuntjens J; Ballivy O; Parker W Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(5):879-90. PubMed ID: 15798262 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The dosimetric effects of tissue heterogeneities in intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) of the head and neck. Al-Hallaq HA; Reft CS; Roeske JC Phys Med Biol; 2006 Mar; 51(5):1145-56. PubMed ID: 16481684 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. High density dental materials and radiotherapy planning: comparison of the dose predictions using superposition algorithm and fluence map Monte Carlo method with radiochromic film measurements. Spirydovich S; Papiez L; Langer M; Sandison G; Thai V Radiother Oncol; 2006 Dec; 81(3):309-14. PubMed ID: 17113666 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dosimetric verification for intensity-modulated radiotherapy of thoracic cancers using experimental and Monte Carlo approaches. Jang SY; Liu HH; Wang X; Vassiliev ON; Siebers JV; Dong L; Mohan R Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Nov; 66(3):939-48. PubMed ID: 17011466 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Improving IMRT dose accuracy via deliverable Monte Carlo optimization for the treatment of head and neck cancer patients. Dogan N; Siebers JV; Keall PJ; Lerma F; Wu Y; Fatyga M; Williamson JF; Schmidt-Ullrich RK Med Phys; 2006 Nov; 33(11):4033-43. PubMed ID: 17153383 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Experimental measurements and Monte Carlo simulations for dosimetric evaluations of intrafraction motion for gated and ungated intensity modulated arc therapy deliveries. Oliver M; Gladwish A; Staruch R; Craig J; Gaede S; Chen J; Wong E Phys Med Biol; 2008 Nov; 53(22):6419-36. PubMed ID: 18941277 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of inhomogeneity correction algorithm in intensity-modulated radiotherapy of head-and-neck tumors. Yoon M; Lee DH; Shin D; Lee SB; Park SY; Cho KH Med Dosim; 2007; 32(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 17317535 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of dose prediction errors and optimization convergence errors of deliverable-based head-and-neck IMRT plans computed with a superposition/convolution dose algorithm. Mihaylov IB; Siebers JV Med Phys; 2008 Aug; 35(8):3722-7. PubMed ID: 18777931 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison of Monte Carlo and Fermi-Eyges-Hogstrom estimates of heart and lung dose from breast electron boost treatment. Coleman J; Park C; Villarreal-Barajas JE; Petti P; Faddegon B Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Feb; 61(2):621-8. PubMed ID: 15667984 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dosimetric comparison between 2-dimensional radiation therapy and intensity modulated radiation therapy in treatment of advanced T-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma: to treat less or more in the planning organ-at-risk volume of the brainstem and spinal cord. Chau RM; Teo PM; Kam MK; Leung SF; Cheung KY; Chan AT Med Dosim; 2007; 32(4):263-70. PubMed ID: 17980826 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of dose engine accuracy on the optimum dose distribution in intensity-modulated proton therapy treatment plans. Soukup M; Alber M Phys Med Biol; 2007 Feb; 52(3):725-40. PubMed ID: 17228117 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) dosimetry of the head and neck: a comparison of treatment plans using linear accelerator-based IMRT and helical tomotherapy. Sheng K; Molloy JA; Read PW Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Jul; 65(3):917-23. PubMed ID: 16751074 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Treatment plan comparison between helical tomotherapy and MLC-based IMRT using radiobiological measures. Mavroidis P; Ferreira BC; Shi C; Lind BK; Papanikolaou N Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(13):3817-36. PubMed ID: 17664579 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Patient-specific dosimetry of conventional and intensity modulated radiation therapy using a novel full Monte Carlo phase space reconstruction method from electronic portal images. Jarry G; Verhaegen F Phys Med Biol; 2007 Apr; 52(8):2277-99. PubMed ID: 17404469 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy dose prescription, recording, and delivery: patterns of variability among institutions and treatment planning systems. Das IJ; Cheng CW; Chopra KL; Mitra RK; Srivastava SP; Glatstein E J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 Mar; 100(5):300-7. PubMed ID: 18314476 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]