These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

346 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16458797)

  • 1. A biomechanical and radiographic analysis of standard and intracortical suture anchors for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.
    Mahar A; Allred DW; Wedemeyer M; Abbi G; Pedowitz R
    Arthroscopy; 2006 Feb; 22(2):130-5. PubMed ID: 16458797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cyclic loading biomechanical analysis of the pullout strengths of rotator cuff and glenoid anchors: 2013 update.
    Barber FA; Herbert MA
    Arthroscopy; 2013 May; 29(5):832-44. PubMed ID: 23561482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cyclic load testing of biodegradable suture anchors containing 2 high-strength sutures.
    Barber FA; Coons DA; Ruiz-Suarez M
    Arthroscopy; 2007 Apr; 23(4):355-60. PubMed ID: 17418326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Biomechanical testing of a new knotless suture anchor compared with established anchors for rotator cuff repair.
    Pietschmann MF; Froehlich V; Ficklscherer A; Wegener B; Jansson V; Müller PE
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2008; 17(4):642-6. PubMed ID: 18396417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Initial fixation and cyclic loading stability of knotless suture anchors for rotator cuff repair.
    Brown BS; Cooper AD; McIff TE; Key VH; Toby EB
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2008; 17(2):313-8. PubMed ID: 18036851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A biomechanical comparison of tendon-bone interface motion and cyclic loading between single-row, triple-loaded cuff repairs and double-row, suture-tape cuff repairs using biocomposite anchors.
    Barber FA; Drew OR
    Arthroscopy; 2012 Sep; 28(9):1197-205. PubMed ID: 22592123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Biomechanical evaluation of transosseous rotator cuff repair: do anchors really matter?
    Salata MJ; Sherman SL; Lin EC; Sershon RA; Gupta A; Shewman E; Wang VM; Cole BJ; Romeo AA; Verma NN
    Am J Sports Med; 2013 Feb; 41(2):283-90. PubMed ID: 23239668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Biomechanical comparison of tibial eminence fracture fixation with high-strength suture, EndoButton, and suture anchor.
    Hapa O; Barber FA; Süner G; Özden R; Davul S; Bozdağ E; Sünbüloğlu E
    Arthroscopy; 2012 May; 28(5):681-7. PubMed ID: 22284410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biomechanical comparison of traditional anchors to all-suture anchors in a double-row rotator cuff repair cadaver model.
    Goschka AM; Hafer JS; Reynolds KA; Aberle NS; Baldini TH; Hawkins MJ; McCarty EC
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2015 Oct; 30(8):808-13. PubMed ID: 26117162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cyclic load testing and ultimate failure strength of suture anchors in the acetabular rim.
    Ruiz-Suarez M; Aziz-Jacobo J; Barber FA
    Arthroscopy; 2010 Jun; 26(6):762-8. PubMed ID: 20511034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. In vitro analysis of rotator cuff repairs: a comparison of arthroscopically inserted tacks or anchors with open transosseous repairs.
    Chhabra A; Goradia VK; Francke EI; Baer GS; Monahan T; Kline AJ; Miller MD
    Arthroscopy; 2005 Mar; 21(3):323-7. PubMed ID: 15756187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Increasing the insertion depth of suture anchors for rotator cuff repair does not improve biomechanical stability.
    Mahar AT; Tucker BS; Upasani VV; Oka RS; Pedowitz RA
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2005; 14(6):626-30. PubMed ID: 16337531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Suture anchor fixation strength in osteopenic versus non-osteopenic bone for rotator cuff repair.
    Pietschmann MF; Fröhlich V; Ficklscherer A; Gülecyüz MF; Wegener B; Jansson V; Müller PE
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2009 Mar; 129(3):373-9. PubMed ID: 18607610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cyclic load testing and ultimate failure strength of biodegradable glenoid anchors.
    Barber FA; Coons DA; Ruiz-Suarez M
    Arthroscopy; 2008 Feb; 24(2):224-8. PubMed ID: 18237708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biomechanical comparison of bioabsorbable sutureless screw anchor versus suture anchor fixation for rotator cuff repair.
    Lee S; Mahar A; Bynum K; Pedowitz R
    Arthroscopy; 2005 Jan; 21(1):43-7. PubMed ID: 15650665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Failure analysis of rotator cuff repair: a comparison of three double-row techniques.
    Zheng N; Harris HW; Andrews JR
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2008 May; 90(5):1034-42. PubMed ID: 18451396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Rotator cuff repair with bioabsorbable screws: An in vivo and ex vivo investigation.
    Cummins CA; Strickland S; Appleyard RC; Szomor ZL; Marshall J; Murrell GA
    Arthroscopy; 2003 Mar; 19(3):239-48. PubMed ID: 12627147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Biomechanical analysis of pullout strengths of rotator cuff and glenoid anchors: 2011 update.
    Barber FA; Herbert MA; Hapa O; Rapley JH; Barber CA; Bynum JA; Hrnack SA
    Arthroscopy; 2011 Jul; 27(7):895-905. PubMed ID: 21693345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of the angle of suture anchor insertion on fixation failure at the tendon-suture interface after rotator cuff repair: deadman's angle revisited.
    Strauss E; Frank D; Kubiak E; Kummer F; Rokito A
    Arthroscopy; 2009 Jun; 25(6):597-602. PubMed ID: 19501288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Initial fixation strength of transosseous-equivalent suture bridge rotator cuff repair is comparable with transosseous repair.
    Behrens SB; Bruce B; Zonno AJ; Paller D; Green A
    Am J Sports Med; 2012 Jan; 40(1):133-40. PubMed ID: 22088578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.