These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16459036)

  • 1. Rehabilitation plasticity: influence of hearing aid fitting on frequency discrimination performance near the hearing-loss cut-off.
    Gabriel D; Veuillet E; Vesson JF; Collet L
    Hear Res; 2006 Mar; 213(1-2):49-57. PubMed ID: 16459036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Simple reaction times in subjects with steeply sloping hearing loss: is there an alteration at the edge of the loss?
    Gabriel D; Veuillet E; Bonnet C; Vesson JF; Collet L
    Int J Audiol; 2006 Aug; 45(8):454-62. PubMed ID: 17005488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Enhanced frequency discrimination near the hearing loss cut-off: a consequence of central auditory plasticity induced by cochlear damage?
    Thai-Van H; Micheyl C; Moore BC; Collet L
    Brain; 2003 Oct; 126(Pt 10):2235-45. PubMed ID: 12847078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Plasticity of tonotopic maps in humans: influence of hearing loss, hearing aids and cochlear implants.
    Thai-Van H; Veuillet E; Norena A; Guiraud J; Collet L
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2010 Mar; 130(3):333-7. PubMed ID: 19845491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Active middle ear implant compared with open-fit hearing aid in sloping high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss.
    Boeheim K; Pok SM; Schloegel M; Filzmoser P
    Otol Neurotol; 2010 Apr; 31(3):424-9. PubMed ID: 20042907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Standard cochlear implantation of adults with residual low-frequency hearing: implications for combined electro-acoustic stimulation.
    Novak MA; Black JM; Koch DB
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):609-14. PubMed ID: 17514064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Enhanced frequency discrimination in hearing-impaired individuals: a review of perceptual correlates of central neural plasticity induced by cochlear damage.
    Thai-Van H; Micheyl C; Norena A; Veuillet E; Gabriel D; Collet L
    Hear Res; 2007 Nov; 233(1-2):14-22. PubMed ID: 17658232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Loudness perception and frequency discrimination in subjects with steeply sloping hearing loss: possible correlates of neural plasticity.
    McDermott HJ; Lech M; Kornblum MS; Irvine DR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Oct; 104(4):2314-25. PubMed ID: 10491696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The auditory acclimatization effect in sensorineural hearing-impaired listeners: evidence for functional plasticity.
    Philibert B; Collet L; Vesson JF; Veuillet E
    Hear Res; 2005 Jul; 205(1-2):131-42. PubMed ID: 15953523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Frequency-compression outcomes in listeners with steeply sloping audiograms.
    Simpson A; Hersbach AA; McDermott HJ
    Int J Audiol; 2006 Nov; 45(11):619-29. PubMed ID: 17118905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Low-frequency sensorineural loss: clinical evaluation and implications for hearing aid fitting.
    Halpin C; Thornton A; Hasso M
    Ear Hear; 1994 Feb; 15(1):71-81. PubMed ID: 8194681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Acclimatization in first-time hearing aid users using three different fitting protocols.
    Reber MB; Kompis M
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2005 Dec; 32(4):345-51. PubMed ID: 16039083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Hearing in advanced age: critical view of so-called presbycusis].
    Schultz-Coulon HJ
    HNO; 1985 Jan; 33(1):2-10. PubMed ID: 3972643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of extended-range frequency-response amplification in hearing aids.
    Forrester JI; Raffin MJ
    J Aud Res; 1982 Jan; 22(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 7187908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of stimulus level on the speech perception abilities of children using cochlear implants or digital hearing aids.
    Davidson LS
    Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):493-507. PubMed ID: 16957500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Hearing aids and cochlear damage: the case against fitting the pure tone audiogram.
    Halpin C; Rauch SD
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2009 May; 140(5):629-32. PubMed ID: 19393401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The influence of different speech processor and hearing aid settings on speech perception outcomes in electric acoustic stimulation patients.
    Vermeire K; Anderson I; Flynn M; Van de Heyning P
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jan; 29(1):76-86. PubMed ID: 18091097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cochlear Implantation in Children with Postlingual Progressive Steeply Sloping High-Frequency Hearing Loss.
    Meredith MA; Rubinstein JT; Sie KCY; Norton SJ
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2017; 28(10):913-919. PubMed ID: 29130439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Digital hearing aids for high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss: preliminary experience with the RetroX device.
    Barbara M; Bandiera G; Serra B; Marrone V; Tarentini S; Pinna JC; Ronchetti F; Graziadio M; Monini S
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jul; 125(7):693-6. PubMed ID: 16012028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Using genetic algorithms with subjective input from human subjects: implications for fitting hearing aids and cochlear implants.
    Başkent D; Eiler CL; Edwards B
    Ear Hear; 2007 Jun; 28(3):370-80. PubMed ID: 17485986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.