279 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16459178)
1. Applying DOE's Graded Approach for assessing radiation impacts to non-human biota at the INL.
Morris RC
J Environ Radioact; 2006; 87(1):77-100. PubMed ID: 16459178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Derivation of a screening methodology for evaluating radiation dose to aquatic and terrestrial biota.
Higley KA; Domotor SL; Antonio EJ; Kocher DC
J Environ Radioact; 2003; 66(1-2):41-59. PubMed ID: 12590069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A probabilistic approach to obtaining limiting estimates of radionuclide concentration in biota.
Higley KA; Domotor SL; Antonio EJ
J Environ Radioact; 2003; 66(1-2):75-87. PubMed ID: 12590071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Ambient environmental profile for the Savannah River Site.
Rollins EM
Health Phys; 2008 Jul; 95(1):55-68. PubMed ID: 18545030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Principles and issues in radiological ecological risk assessment.
Jones D; Domotor S; Higley K; Kocher D; Bilyard G
J Environ Radioact; 2003; 66(1-2):19-39. PubMed ID: 12590068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative radiation impact on biota and man in the area affected by the accident at the Chernobyl nuclear power plant.
Fesenko SV; Alexakhin RM; Geras'kin SA; Sanzharova NI; Spirin YV; Spiridonov SI; Gontarenko IA; Strand P
J Environ Radioact; 2005; 80(1):1-25. PubMed ID: 15653184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of doses from ionising radiation to non-human species at Trombay, Mumbai, India.
Singhal RK; Ajay K; Usha N; Reddy AV
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2009 Feb; 133(4):214-22. PubMed ID: 19339303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Radioprotection of nonhuman biota.
Delistraty D
J Environ Radioact; 2008 Dec; 99(12):1863-9. PubMed ID: 18952327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Intergrated assessment of the radioecological state of the biota in Moscow water objects].
Shatokhin AM; Shmonov MG; Krasotkin VA; Umniashova EE; Nikiforova SE; Zozul' IuN
Gig Sanit; 2009; (1):25-8. PubMed ID: 19354183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Application of the ERICA Assessment Tool to freshwater biota in Finland.
Vetikko V; Saxén R
J Environ Radioact; 2010 Jan; 101(1):82-7. PubMed ID: 19828217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Twenty-five-year study of radionuclides in the Susquehanna river via periphyton biomonitors.
Patrick R; Palms J; Kreeger D; Harris C
Health Phys; 2007 Jan; 92(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 17164593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A kinetic-allometric approach to predicting tissue radionuclide concentrations for biota.
Higley KA; Domotor SL; Antonio EJ
J Environ Radioact; 2003; 66(1-2):61-74. PubMed ID: 12590070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Transfer of radionuclides in aquatic ecosystems--default concentration ratios for aquatic biota in the Erica Tool.
Hosseini A; Thørring H; Brown JE; Saxén R; Ilus E
J Environ Radioact; 2008 Sep; 99(9):1408-29. PubMed ID: 18343543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Radioactivity concentrations and dose assessment for soil samples from Kestanbol granite area, Turkey.
Merdanoğlu B; Altinsoy N
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 121(4):399-405. PubMed ID: 16698965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Factors affecting dose estimates for long-term performance assessments: case study-Armagosa Valley.
Moeller DW; Ryan MT; Sun LS
Health Phys; 2007 Feb; 92(2):127-33. PubMed ID: 17220714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Natural radioactivity levels in granitic plutons and groundwaters in Southeast part of Eskisehir, Turkey.
Orgün Y; Altinsoy N; Gültekin AH; Karahan G; Celebi N
Appl Radiat Isot; 2005 Aug; 63(2):267-75. PubMed ID: 15921915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Choosing an alpha radiation weighting factor for doses to non-human biota.
Chambers DB; Osborne RV; Garva AL
J Environ Radioact; 2006; 87(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 16377039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A biomonitoring plan for assessing potential radionuclide exposure using Amchitka Island in the Aleutian chain of Alaska as a case study.
Burger J; Gochfeld M; Kosson DS; Powers CW
J Environ Radioact; 2007; 98(3):315-28. PubMed ID: 17683832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Background and anthropogenic radionuclide derived dose rates to freshwater ecosystem: nuclear power plant cooling pond: reference organisms.
Nedveckaite T; Filistovic V; Marciulioniene D; Prokoptchuk N; Plukiene R; Gudelis A; Remeikis V; Yankovich T; Beresford NA
J Environ Radioact; 2011 Aug; 102(8):788-95. PubMed ID: 21601320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessing doses to terrestrial wildlife at a radioactive waste disposal site: inter-comparison of modelling approaches.
Johansen MP; Barnett CL; Beresford NA; Brown JE; Černe M; Howard BJ; Kamboj S; Keum DK; Smodiš B; Twining JR; Vandenhove H; Vives i Batlle J; Wood MD; Yu C
Sci Total Environ; 2012 Jun; 427-428():238-46. PubMed ID: 22578842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
