These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

275 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16459178)

  • 1. Applying DOE's Graded Approach for assessing radiation impacts to non-human biota at the INL.
    Morris RC
    J Environ Radioact; 2006; 87(1):77-100. PubMed ID: 16459178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Derivation of a screening methodology for evaluating radiation dose to aquatic and terrestrial biota.
    Higley KA; Domotor SL; Antonio EJ; Kocher DC
    J Environ Radioact; 2003; 66(1-2):41-59. PubMed ID: 12590069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A probabilistic approach to obtaining limiting estimates of radionuclide concentration in biota.
    Higley KA; Domotor SL; Antonio EJ
    J Environ Radioact; 2003; 66(1-2):75-87. PubMed ID: 12590071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ambient environmental profile for the Savannah River Site.
    Rollins EM
    Health Phys; 2008 Jul; 95(1):55-68. PubMed ID: 18545030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Principles and issues in radiological ecological risk assessment.
    Jones D; Domotor S; Higley K; Kocher D; Bilyard G
    J Environ Radioact; 2003; 66(1-2):19-39. PubMed ID: 12590068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative radiation impact on biota and man in the area affected by the accident at the Chernobyl nuclear power plant.
    Fesenko SV; Alexakhin RM; Geras'kin SA; Sanzharova NI; Spirin YV; Spiridonov SI; Gontarenko IA; Strand P
    J Environ Radioact; 2005; 80(1):1-25. PubMed ID: 15653184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of doses from ionising radiation to non-human species at Trombay, Mumbai, India.
    Singhal RK; Ajay K; Usha N; Reddy AV
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2009 Feb; 133(4):214-22. PubMed ID: 19339303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Radioprotection of nonhuman biota.
    Delistraty D
    J Environ Radioact; 2008 Dec; 99(12):1863-9. PubMed ID: 18952327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Intergrated assessment of the radioecological state of the biota in Moscow water objects].
    Shatokhin AM; Shmonov MG; Krasotkin VA; Umniashova EE; Nikiforova SE; Zozul' IuN
    Gig Sanit; 2009; (1):25-8. PubMed ID: 19354183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Application of the ERICA Assessment Tool to freshwater biota in Finland.
    Vetikko V; Saxén R
    J Environ Radioact; 2010 Jan; 101(1):82-7. PubMed ID: 19828217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Twenty-five-year study of radionuclides in the Susquehanna river via periphyton biomonitors.
    Patrick R; Palms J; Kreeger D; Harris C
    Health Phys; 2007 Jan; 92(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 17164593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A kinetic-allometric approach to predicting tissue radionuclide concentrations for biota.
    Higley KA; Domotor SL; Antonio EJ
    J Environ Radioact; 2003; 66(1-2):61-74. PubMed ID: 12590070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Transfer of radionuclides in aquatic ecosystems--default concentration ratios for aquatic biota in the Erica Tool.
    Hosseini A; Thørring H; Brown JE; Saxén R; Ilus E
    J Environ Radioact; 2008 Sep; 99(9):1408-29. PubMed ID: 18343543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Radioactivity concentrations and dose assessment for soil samples from Kestanbol granite area, Turkey.
    Merdanoğlu B; Altinsoy N
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 121(4):399-405. PubMed ID: 16698965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Factors affecting dose estimates for long-term performance assessments: case study-Armagosa Valley.
    Moeller DW; Ryan MT; Sun LS
    Health Phys; 2007 Feb; 92(2):127-33. PubMed ID: 17220714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Natural radioactivity levels in granitic plutons and groundwaters in Southeast part of Eskisehir, Turkey.
    Orgün Y; Altinsoy N; Gültekin AH; Karahan G; Celebi N
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2005 Aug; 63(2):267-75. PubMed ID: 15921915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Choosing an alpha radiation weighting factor for doses to non-human biota.
    Chambers DB; Osborne RV; Garva AL
    J Environ Radioact; 2006; 87(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 16377039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A biomonitoring plan for assessing potential radionuclide exposure using Amchitka Island in the Aleutian chain of Alaska as a case study.
    Burger J; Gochfeld M; Kosson DS; Powers CW
    J Environ Radioact; 2007; 98(3):315-28. PubMed ID: 17683832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Background and anthropogenic radionuclide derived dose rates to freshwater ecosystem: nuclear power plant cooling pond: reference organisms.
    Nedveckaite T; Filistovic V; Marciulioniene D; Prokoptchuk N; Plukiene R; Gudelis A; Remeikis V; Yankovich T; Beresford NA
    J Environ Radioact; 2011 Aug; 102(8):788-95. PubMed ID: 21601320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessing doses to terrestrial wildlife at a radioactive waste disposal site: inter-comparison of modelling approaches.
    Johansen MP; Barnett CL; Beresford NA; Brown JE; Černe M; Howard BJ; Kamboj S; Keum DK; Smodiš B; Twining JR; Vandenhove H; Vives i Batlle J; Wood MD; Yu C
    Sci Total Environ; 2012 Jun; 427-428():238-46. PubMed ID: 22578842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.