These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Standards for the formulation of evaluative forensic science expert opinion Association of Forensic Science Providers. Willis S Sci Justice; 2010 Mar; 50(1):49. PubMed ID: 20408380 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Anti-doping researchers should conform to certain statistical standards from forensic science. Faber K; Sjerps M Sci Justice; 2009 Sep; 49(3):214-5. PubMed ID: 19839422 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Commentary on: Bohan TL. President's editorial--Strengthening forensic science: a way station on the journey to justice. Sapir JD J Forensic Sci; 2010 Sep; 55(5):1397. PubMed ID: 21050206 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The current status of forensic science laboratory accreditation in Europe. Malkoc E; Neuteboom W Forensic Sci Int; 2007 Apr; 167(2-3):121-6. PubMed ID: 16876355 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Strengthening forensic science: a way station on the journey to justice. Bohan TL J Forensic Sci; 2010 Jan; 55(1):5-7. PubMed ID: 20412154 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The use of handwriting examinations beyond the traditional court purpose. Agius A; Jones K; Epple R; Morelato M; Moret S; Chadwick S; Roux C Sci Justice; 2017 Sep; 57(5):394-400. PubMed ID: 28889870 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Science in court: the fine print. Spinney L Nature; 2010 Mar; 464(7287):344-6. PubMed ID: 20237537 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]