These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

285 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16459419)

  • 1. Professional responsibility and the protection of human subjects of research in Canada.
    Dinsdale H
    Health Law Rev; 2005; 13(2-3):80-5. PubMed ID: 16459419
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accreditation and certification for human research protection programs.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2001 Nov; 16(11):1-2. PubMed ID: 11883458
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ethical oversight of research in developing countries.
    Kass N; Dawson L; Loyo-Berrios NI
    IRB; 2003; 25(2):1-10. PubMed ID: 12833901
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Recurrent issues in the review of medical research on human subjects.
    Moore DL
    Albany Law J Sci Technol; 1991; 1():1-33. PubMed ID: 16296123
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Beyond compliance...is it too much to ask?
    Koski G
    IRB; 2003; 25(5):5-6. PubMed ID: 14870726
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A review of OHRP compliance oversight letters.
    Borror K; Carome M; McNeilly P; Weil C
    IRB; 2003; 25(5):1-4. PubMed ID: 14870724
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. SACHRP recommendations for review of children's research requiring DHHS secretary's approval.
    Fisher CB; Kornetsky SZ
    IRB; 2005; 27(3):8-10. PubMed ID: 16021795
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Institutional review boards (IRBs) failed to use steps to protect vulnerable research subjects.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2003 Jun; 18(6):6-7. PubMed ID: 15119342
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bioethical malpractice: risk and responsibilities in human research.
    Noah BA
    J Health Care Law Policy; 2004; 7(2):175-241. PubMed ID: 15573441
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Human experimentation: the regulation controversy.
    Society; 1975; 13(1):4-12. PubMed ID: 11662982
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Research oversight through new lenses: the consortium to examine clinical research ethics.
    Sugarman J; Eckenwiler LA; Emanuel EJ
    IRB; 2003; 25(1):9-10. PubMed ID: 12833899
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The task for ethics review: should research ethics boards address an approach or a paradigm?
    Nelson CH; McPherson DH
    NCEHR Commun; 2004; 12(2):11-22. PubMed ID: 15460563
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evidence-based practice of research ethics review?
    Beagan B; McDonald M
    Health Law Rev; 2005; 13(2-3):62-8. PubMed ID: 16459416
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An act...to establish a program of National Research Service Awards...and to provide for the protection of human subjects involved in biomedical and behavioral research.... Approved 12 Jul 1974.
    U.S
    US Statut Large; 1974; 88 342-354():2-354. PubMed ID: 12085916
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. National Research Service Awards and Protection of Human Subjects Act.
    Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1973 Sep; 119(131):S16333-52. PubMed ID: 11663135
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Federal regulation of REB review of clinical trials: a modest but easy step towards an accountable REB review structure in Canada.
    Lemmens T
    Health Law Rev; 2005; 13(2-3):39-50. PubMed ID: 16459413
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Institutional review boards and institutions not doing enough to protect human subjects.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2000 Jun; 15(6):1-3. PubMed ID: 12199292
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Institution must admit to parents that children should not have been subjects.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2001 Apr; 16(4):6-7. PubMed ID: 11883456
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The protection of human subjects: an open letter to NIH.
    Reynolds PD
    Am Sociol; 1974 Nov; 9(4):221-5. PubMed ID: 11663254
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An evaluation of human subjects protection at CDC/ATSDR.
    Santelli J; Ginn E; Speers MA
    IRB; 2000; 22(4):1-7. PubMed ID: 11883474
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.