These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. A Christian philosopher's view of recent directions in the abortion debate. Lee P Christ Bioeth; 2004; 10(1):7-31. PubMed ID: 15672530 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A note on metaphysics and embryology. Gómez-Lobo A Theor Med Bioeth; 2007; 28(4):331-5; author reply 337-40. PubMed ID: 17940852 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Immediate animation: Thomistic principles applied to Norman Ford's objections. Velez JR Ethics Med; 2005; 21(1):11-28. PubMed ID: 15835089 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. "Altered nuclear transfer": probing the nature of being human. Hoehner PJ Natl Cathol Bioeth Q; 2005; 5(2):261-9. PubMed ID: 16170883 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The moral status of the human embryo according to Peter Singer: individuality, humanity, and personhood. Howard J Linacre Q; 2005 Aug; 72(3):212-28. PubMed ID: 16317845 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The nature of the human embryo: philosophical perspectives. Palazzani L Ethics Med; 1996; 12(1):14-7. PubMed ID: 11657944 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Holistic systems and "delayed hominization" are incompatible. Byrnes WM Natl Cathol Bioeth Q; 2005; 5(3):447-48; author reply 448. PubMed ID: 16425494 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. IVF technology and the argument from potential. Singer P; Dawson K Philos Public Aff; 1988; 17(2):87-104. PubMed ID: 11659114 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Abortion and the human animal. Tollefsen C Christ Bioeth; 2004; 10(1):105-16. PubMed ID: 15675044 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Totipotency, twinning, and ensoulment at fertilization. Koch-Hershenov R J Med Philos; 2006 Apr; 31(2):139-64. PubMed ID: 16595345 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The zygote, the embryo, and personhood: an attempt at conceptual clarification. Young K Ethics Med; 1994; 10(1):2-7. PubMed ID: 11652748 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The zygote and personhood. DeMarco D Hum Life Rev; 2000; 26(2-3):91-8. PubMed ID: 12528752 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Human embryonic stem cell research: what's wrong with it? Oderberg DS Hum Life Rev; 2005; 31(4):21-33. PubMed ID: 16619431 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Of embryos and empire. Cohen E New Atlantis; 2003; (2):3-16. PubMed ID: 15584196 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Do embryonic "patients" have moral interests? Strong C Am J Bioeth; 2008 Jul; 8(7):40-2; discussion W4-6. PubMed ID: 18759184 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The argument from potentiality in the embryo protection debate: finally "depotentialized"? Stier M; Schoene-Seifert B Am J Bioeth; 2013; 13(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 23311835 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The potential of the human embryo. Brown MT J Med Philos; 2007; 32(6):585-618. PubMed ID: 18027250 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The scourge: moral implications of natural embryo loss. Ord T Am J Bioeth; 2008 Jul; 8(7):12-9. PubMed ID: 18759175 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]