BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

476 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16460244)

  • 1. Comparative study of two root coverage procedures: a 24-month follow-up multicenter study.
    Moses O; Artzi Z; Sculean A; Tal H; Kozlovsky A; Romanos GE; Nemcovsky CE
    J Periodontol; 2006 Feb; 77(2):195-202. PubMed ID: 16460244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A multicenter comparative study of two root coverage procedures: coronally advanced flap with addition of enamel matrix proteins and subpedicle connective tissue graft.
    Nemcovsky CE; Artzi Z; Tal H; Kozlovsky A; Moses O
    J Periodontol; 2004 Apr; 75(4):600-7. PubMed ID: 15152826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Harvesting technique using a mucotome and modified surgical procedure for root coverage with enamel matrix derivatives with and without a connective tissue graft.
    Gunay H; Dogan S; Geurtsen W
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2008 Oct; 28(5):497-507. PubMed ID: 18991001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of human recession defects treated with coronally advanced flaps and either enamel matrix derivative or connective tissue: comparison of clinical parameters at 10 years.
    McGuire MK; Scheyer ET; Nunn M
    J Periodontol; 2012 Nov; 83(11):1353-62. PubMed ID: 22348698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. EMD or subepithelial connective tissue graft for the treatment of single gingival recessions: a pilot study.
    Alkan EA; Parlar A
    J Periodontal Res; 2011 Dec; 46(6):637-42. PubMed ID: 21631510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Subepithelial connective tissue graft for treatment of gingival recessions with and without enamel matrix derivative: a multicenter, randomized controlled clinical trial.
    Rasperini G; Roccuzzo M; Francetti L; Acunzo R; Consonni D; Silvestri M
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2011 Apr; 31(2):133-9. PubMed ID: 21491012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Enamel matrix derivative and coronal flaps to cover marginal tissue recessions.
    Castellanos A; de la Rosa M; de la Garza M; Caffesse RG
    J Periodontol; 2006 Jan; 77(1):7-14. PubMed ID: 16579697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of human recession defects treated with coronally advanced flaps and either enamel matrix derivative or connective tissue. Part 1: Comparison of clinical parameters.
    McGuire MK; Nunn M
    J Periodontol; 2003 Aug; 74(8):1110-25. PubMed ID: 14514224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Xenogeneic collagen matrix with coronally advanced flap compared to connective tissue with coronally advanced flap for the treatment of dehiscence-type recession defects.
    McGuire MK; Scheyer ET
    J Periodontol; 2010 Aug; 81(8):1108-17. PubMed ID: 20350159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative clinical study of a bioabsorbable membrane and subepithelial connective tissue graft in the treatment of human gingival recession.
    Borghetti A; Glise JM; Monnet-Corti V; Dejou J
    J Periodontol; 1999 Feb; 70(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 10102549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Coronally advanced flap alone or with connective tissue graft in the treatment of single gingival recession defects: a long-term randomized clinical trial.
    Kuis D; Sciran I; Lajnert V; Snjaric D; Prpic J; Pezelj-Ribaric S; Bosnjak A
    J Periodontol; 2013 Nov; 84(11):1576-85. PubMed ID: 23432657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Coronally positioned flap procedures with or without a bioabsorbable membrane in the treatment of human gingival recession.
    Amarante ES; Leknes KN; Skavland J; Lie T
    J Periodontol; 2000 Jun; 71(6):989-98. PubMed ID: 10914803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Subepithelial connective tissue graft with or without enamel matrix derivative for the treatment of Miller class I and II gingival recessions: a controlled randomized clinical trial.
    Roman A; Soancă A; Kasaj A; Stratul SI
    J Periodontal Res; 2013 Oct; 48(5):563-72. PubMed ID: 23317049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Treatment of gingival recessions by combined periodontal regenerative technique, guided tissue regeneration, and subpedicle connective tissue graft. A comparative clinical study.
    Paolantonio M
    J Periodontol; 2002 Jan; 73(1):53-62. PubMed ID: 11846201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Coverage of Miller class I and II recession defects using enamel matrix proteins versus coronally advanced flap technique: a 2-year report.
    Spahr A; Haegewald S; Tsoulfidou F; Rompola E; Heijl L; Bernimoulin JP; Ring C; Sander S; Haller B
    J Periodontol; 2005 Nov; 76(11):1871-80. PubMed ID: 16274306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative 6-month clinical study of a semilunar coronally positioned flap and subepithelial connective tissue graft for the treatment of gingival recession.
    Bittencourt S; Del Peloso Ribeiro E; Sallum EA; Sallum AW; Nociti FH; Casati MZ
    J Periodontol; 2006 Feb; 77(2):174-81. PubMed ID: 16460241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Treatment of multiple adjacent Miller class I and II gingival recessions with a Modified Coronally Advanced Tunnel (MCAT) technique and a collagen matrix or palatal connective tissue graft: a randomized, controlled clinical trial.
    Aroca S; Molnár B; Windisch P; Gera I; Salvi GE; Nikolidakis D; Sculean A
    J Clin Periodontol; 2013 Jul; 40(7):713-20. PubMed ID: 23627374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of 2 clinical techniques for treatment of gingival recession.
    Wang HL; Bunyaratavej P; Labadie M; Shyr Y; MacNeil RL
    J Periodontol; 2001 Oct; 72(10):1301-11. PubMed ID: 11699470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Treatment of gingival recession defects using coronally advanced flap with a porcine collagen matrix compared to coronally advanced flap with connective tissue graft: a randomized controlled clinical trial.
    Cardaropoli D; Tamagnone L; Roffredo A; Gaveglio L
    J Periodontol; 2012 Mar; 83(3):321-8. PubMed ID: 21721988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Tunnel technique with connective tissue graft versus coronally advanced flap with enamel matrix derivative for root coverage: a RCT using 3D digital measuring methods. Part II. Volumetric studies on healing dynamics and gingival dimensions.
    Rebele SF; Zuhr O; Schneider D; Jung RE; Hürzeler MB
    J Clin Periodontol; 2014 Jun; 41(6):593-603. PubMed ID: 24708338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 24.