BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16460573)

  • 21. Reconstruction of layered biological tissues via electrical impedance tomography.
    Dolgin M; Einziger PD
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Dec; 53(12 Pt 1):2464-71. PubMed ID: 17153203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Electrical impedance tomography for piecewise constant domains using boundary element shape-based inverse solutions.
    Babaeizadeh S; Brooks DH
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2007 May; 26(5):637-47. PubMed ID: 17518058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of applied and induced current electrical impedance tomography.
    Tanguay LF; Gagnon H; Guardo R
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2007 Sep; 54(9):1643-9. PubMed ID: 17867356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Estimation of anomaly location and size using electrical impedance tomography.
    Kwon O; Yoon JR; Seo JK; Woo EJ; Cho YG
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2003 Jan; 50(1):89-96. PubMed ID: 12617528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A novel approach for EIT regularization via spatial and spectral principal component analysis.
    Goharian M; Bruwer MJ; Jegatheesan A; Moran GR; MacGregor JF
    Physiol Meas; 2007 Sep; 28(9):1001-16. PubMed ID: 17827649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Image reconstruction incorporated with the skull inhomogeneity for electrical impedance tomography.
    Ni A; Dong X; Yang G; Fu F; Tang C
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2008 Jul; 32(5):409-15. PubMed ID: 18501557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Front-tracking image reconstruction algorithm for EIT-monitored cryosurgery using the boundary element method.
    Otten DM; Rubinsky B
    Physiol Meas; 2005 Aug; 26(4):503-16. PubMed ID: 15886444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A method for modelling and optimizing an electrical impedance tomography system.
    Hartinger AE; Gagnon H; Guardo R
    Physiol Meas; 2006 May; 27(5):S51-64. PubMed ID: 16636420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Maxwell-Wagner relaxation in electrical imaging.
    Korjenevsky AV
    Physiol Meas; 2005 Apr; 26(2):S101-10. PubMed ID: 15798223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Detecting cryoablation with EIT and the benefit of including ice front imaging data.
    Edd JF; Rubinsky B
    Physiol Meas; 2006 May; 27(5):S175-85. PubMed ID: 16636409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparison of different methods to define regions of interest for evaluation of regional lung ventilation by EIT.
    Pulletz S; van Genderingen HR; Schmitz G; Zick G; Schädler D; Scholz J; Weiler N; Frerichs I
    Physiol Meas; 2006 May; 27(5):S115-27. PubMed ID: 16636403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. 3-D electrical impedance tomography for piecewise constant domains with known internal boundaries.
    Babaeizadeh S; Brooks DH; Isaacson D
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2007 Jan; 54(1):2-10. PubMed ID: 17260850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Solution of the inverse problem of magnetic induction tomography (MIT) with multiple objects: analysis of detectability and statistical properties with respect to the reconstructed conducting region.
    Merwa R; Brunner P; Missner A; Hollaus K; Scharfetter H
    Physiol Meas; 2006 May; 27(5):S249-59. PubMed ID: 16636415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Magnetic resonance driven electrical impedance tomography: a simulation study.
    Negishi M; Tong T; Constable RT
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2011 Mar; 30(3):828-37. PubMed ID: 21147595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Generating accurate finite element meshes for the forward model of the human head in EIT.
    Tizzard A; Horesh L; Yerworth RJ; Holder DS; Bayford RH
    Physiol Meas; 2005 Apr; 26(2):S251-61. PubMed ID: 15798238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Error analysis of nonconstant admittivity for MR-based electric property imaging.
    Seo JK; Kim MO; Lee J; Choi N; Woo EJ; Kim HJ; Kwon OI; Kim DH
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2012 Feb; 31(2):430-7. PubMed ID: 21990329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Static imaging of the electrical impedance tomography on cylinder physical phantom.
    Liu R; Fu F; You F; Shi X; Dong X
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2015; 26 Suppl 1():S1381-8. PubMed ID: 26405899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Biological impedance cross evaluation and imaging from composite measurements of magnetic and electrical methods.
    Ran P; Xiao X; He W; Li Z
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2015; 26 Suppl 1():S1695-702. PubMed ID: 26405936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Conductivity image reconstruction from defective data in MREIT: numerical simulation and animal experiment.
    Lee SH; Seo JK; Park C; Lee BI; Woo EJ; Lee SY; Kwon O; Hahn J
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2006 Feb; 25(2):168-76. PubMed ID: 16468451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Electrical conductivity images of biological tissue phantoms in MREIT.
    Oh SH; Lee BI; Woo EJ; Lee SY; Kim TS; Kwon O; Seo JK
    Physiol Meas; 2005 Apr; 26(2):S279-88. PubMed ID: 15798241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.