222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16460573)
41. Electrode boundary conditions and experimental validation for BEM-based EIT forward and inverse solutions.
Babaeizadeh S; Brooks DH; Isaacson D; Newell JC
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2006 Sep; 25(9):1180-8. PubMed ID: 16967803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. EIT reconstructions and Faddeev solutions for a numerically simulated phantom chest.
Mueller JL
Biomed Sci Instrum; 2004; 40():213-8. PubMed ID: 15133960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Image reconstruction using interval simulated annealing in electrical impedance tomography.
Martins Tde C; de Camargo ED; Lima RG; Amato MB; Tsuzuki Mde S
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2012 Jul; 59(7):1861-70. PubMed ID: 22361655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Electrical impedance tomography via filtered-back projection of fan current distribution: a numerical simulation.
De Simone BC; Siciliano R; Pachi' A; Cametti C; De Luca F
Bioelectromagnetics; 2002 Oct; 23(7):516-21. PubMed ID: 12224055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Uses and abuses of EIDORS: an extensible software base for EIT.
Adler A; Lionheart WR
Physiol Meas; 2006 May; 27(5):S25-42. PubMed ID: 16636416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Optimum design of electrode structure and parameters in electrical impedance tomography.
Yan W; Hong S; Chaoshi R
Physiol Meas; 2006 Mar; 27(3):291-306. PubMed ID: 16462015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Multi-frequency electrical impedance tomography (EIT) of the adult human head: initial findings in brain tumours, arteriovenous malformations and chronic stroke, development of an analysis method and calibration.
Romsauerova A; McEwan A; Horesh L; Yerworth R; Bayford RH; Holder DS
Physiol Meas; 2006 May; 27(5):S147-61. PubMed ID: 16636407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Distinguishability for magnetic resonance-electrical impedance tomography (MR-EIT).
Altunel H; Eyüboğlu BM; Köksal A
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jan; 52(2):375-87. PubMed ID: 17202621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Multi-parameter ultrasound transmission tomography of biological media.
Opielinski KJ; Gudra T
Ultrasonics; 2006 Dec; 44 Suppl 1():e295-302. PubMed ID: 17005227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Electrical impedance tomography (EIT): a review.
Brown BH
J Med Eng Technol; 2003; 27(3):97-108. PubMed ID: 12775455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Current density impedance imaging.
Hasanov KF; Ma AW; Nachman AI; Joy ML
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2008 Sep; 27(9):1301-9. PubMed ID: 18753045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Imaging electrical impedance from acoustic measurements by means of magnetoacoustic tomography with magnetic induction (MAT-MI).
Li X; Xu Y; He B
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2007 Feb; 54(2):323-30. PubMed ID: 17278589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. [Simulation study of line electrode for electrical impedance tomography].
Wang Y; Sha H; Ren C
Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2007 Oct; 24(5):986-9. PubMed ID: 18027681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Multiple biopsy probe sampling enabled minimally invasive electrical impedance tomography.
Shini M; Rubinsky B
Physiol Meas; 2008 Jan; 29(1):109-26. PubMed ID: 18175863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Local harmonic B(z) algorithm with domain decomposition in MREIT: computer simulation study.
Seo JK; Kim SW; Kim S; Liu JJ; Woo EJ; Jeon K; Lee CO
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2008 Dec; 27(12):1754-61. PubMed ID: 19033091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Noninvasive imaging of bioimpedance distribution by means of current reconstruction magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography.
Gao N; He B
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2008 May; 55(5):1530-8. PubMed ID: 18440899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Design and calibration of a compact multi-frequency EIT system for acute stroke imaging.
McEwan A; Romsauerova A; Yerworth R; Horesh L; Bayford R; Holder D
Physiol Meas; 2006 May; 27(5):S199-210. PubMed ID: 16636411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. J-substitution algorithm in magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT): phantom experiments for static resistivity images.
Khang HS; Lee BI; Oh SH; Woo EJ; Lee SY; Cho MH; Kwon O; Yoon JR; Seo JK
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2002 Jun; 21(6):695-702. PubMed ID: 12166867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Experimental justification for using 3D conductivity reconstructions in electrical impedance tomography.
Halter RJ; Hartov A; Paulsen KD
Physiol Meas; 2007 Jul; 28(7):S115-27. PubMed ID: 17664629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Assessment of 1-lead and 2-lead electrode patterns in electrical impedance endotomography.
Fournier-Desseux A; Jossinet J
Physiol Meas; 2005 Aug; 26(4):337-49. PubMed ID: 15886430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
