These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16461502)

  • 1. Pilot study into optimisation of viewing conditions for electronically displayed images.
    Robson KJ; Kotre CJ
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):298-303. PubMed ID: 16461502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Enhanced visualization processing: effect on workflow.
    Krupinski EA; Radvany M; Levy A; Ballenger D; Tucker J; Chacko A; VanMetter R
    Acad Radiol; 2001 Nov; 8(11):1127-33. PubMed ID: 11721812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Long line positioning in neonates: does computed radiography improve visibility?
    Evans A; Natarajan J; Davies CJ
    Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed; 2004 Jan; 89(1):F44-5. PubMed ID: 14711855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. AEC set-up optimisation with computed radiography imaging.
    Mazzocchi S; Belli G; Busoni S; Gori C; Menchi I; Salucci P; Taddeucci A; Zatelli G
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):169-73. PubMed ID: 16461503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Image quality and dose management in digital radiography: a new paradigm for optimisation.
    Busch HP; Faulkner K
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):143-7. PubMed ID: 16461521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Detection of small pulmonary nodules using direct digital radiography and picture archiving and communication systems.
    Wu N; Gamsu G; Czum J; Held B; Thakur R; Nicola G
    J Thorac Imaging; 2006 Mar; 21(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 16538152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quality assurance (QA) procedures for software: evaluation of an ADC quality system.
    Efstathopoulos EP; Benekos O; Molfetas M; Charou E; Kottou S; Argentos S; Kelekis NL
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):291-7. PubMed ID: 16464840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An investigation into the effects of suboptimal viewing conditions in screen-film mammography.
    Robson KJ
    Br J Radiol; 2008 Mar; 81(963):219-31. PubMed ID: 18270296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Visual perception and image display terminals.
    Kundel HL
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1986 Mar; 24(1):69-78. PubMed ID: 3961130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Detectability decreases with off-normal viewing in medical liquid crystal displays.
    Badano A; Gallas BD
    Acad Radiol; 2006 Feb; 13(2):210-8. PubMed ID: 16428057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quantitative assessment of the influence of anatomic noise on the detection of subtle lung nodule in digital chest radiography using fractal-feature distance.
    Imai K; Ikeda M; Enchi Y; Niimi T
    Eur J Radiol; 2008 Nov; 68(2):353-7. PubMed ID: 17920222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Image browsing in slow medical liquid crystal displays.
    Liang H; Park S; Gallas BD; Myers KJ; Badano A
    Acad Radiol; 2008 Mar; 15(3):370-82. PubMed ID: 18280935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. On the work of the radiologist--separation of image capture from image display.
    Balter S
    Acta Radiol; 1988; 29(3):257-65. PubMed ID: 2968092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Digital radiography: image quality and radiation dose.
    Seibert JA
    Health Phys; 2008 Nov; 95(5):586-98. PubMed ID: 18849693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of new image processing conditions for digital mammograms from Fuji computed radiography.
    Kano H; Endo T; Ikeda M; Oiwa M; Ishigaki T
    Nagoya J Med Sci; 2006 Jun; 68(3-4):131-8. PubMed ID: 16967779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Viewing boxes: a survey in diagnostic radiology departments of Moroccan hospitals.
    Bentayeb F; Nfaoiu K; Basraoui O; Azevedo AC
    Phys Med; 2010 Oct; 26(4):220-3. PubMed ID: 20036176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. View box luminance measurements and their effect on reader performance.
    Rill LN; Huda W; Gkanatsios NA
    Acad Radiol; 1999 Sep; 6(9):521-9. PubMed ID: 10894060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Physical image quality comparison of four types of digital detector for chest radiology.
    Fernandez JM; Ordiales JM; Guibelalde E; Prieto C; Vano E
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):140-3. PubMed ID: 18283060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Soft-copy viewing calls for new way of thinking about images.
    Kundel HL; Krupinski EA
    Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1999 Nov; 21(11):137-8, 141. PubMed ID: 10724834
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Depiction of low-contrast detail in digital radiography: comparison of powder- and needle-structured storage phosphor systems.
    Körner M; Treitl M; Schaetzing R; Pfeifer KJ; Reiser M; Wirth S
    Invest Radiol; 2006 Jul; 41(7):593-9. PubMed ID: 16772853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.