These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16461502)

  • 21. Prototype system for enhancement of frontal chest radiographs using eigenimage processing.
    Butler A; Bones P; Hurrell M
    J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2008 Jun; 52(3):244-53. PubMed ID: 18477119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Spatial and temporal influences on the contrast gauge.
    Shapiro A; Knight E
    Vision Res; 2008 Nov; 48(26):2642-8. PubMed ID: 18664371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A method of clustering observers with different visual characteristics.
    Niimi T; Imai K; Ikeda M; Maeda H
    Eur J Radiol; 2006 Jan; 57(1):158-61. PubMed ID: 15975754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Subjective evaluation of spatial resolution and quantization noise tradeoffs.
    Bae SH; Pappas TN; Juang BH
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2009 Mar; 18(3):495-508. PubMed ID: 19150799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Does the age of liquid crystal displays influence observer performance?
    Krupinski EA; Roehrig H; Fan J
    Acad Radiol; 2007 Apr; 14(4):463-7. PubMed ID: 17368216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Detection of small low-contrast objects in mammography: effect of viewbox masking and luminance.
    Wang J; Gray JE
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Jan; 170(1):105-8. PubMed ID: 9423609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Survey of mammography practice in Croatia: equipment performance, image quality and dose.
    Faj D; Posedel D; Stimac D; Ivezic Z; Kasabasic M; Ivkovic A; Kubelka D; Ilakovac V; Brnic Z; Bjelac OC
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 131(4):535-40. PubMed ID: 18940818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Influence of monitor luminance and room illumination on soft-copy reading evaluation with electronically generated contrast-detail phantom: comparison of cathode-ray tube monitor with liquid crystal display.
    Muramoto H; Shimamoto K; Ikeda M; Koyama K; Fukushima H; Ishigaki T
    Nagoya J Med Sci; 2006 Jun; 68(3-4):115-20. PubMed ID: 16967777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Artifacts in digital mammography.
    Van Ongeval C; Jacobs J; Bosmans H
    JBR-BTR; 2008; 91(6):262-3. PubMed ID: 19203002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Optimization of reading conditions for flat panel displays.
    Thomas JA; Chakrabarti K; Kaczmarek RV; Maslennikov A; Mitchell CA; Romanyukha A
    J Digit Imaging; 2006 Jun; 19(2):181-7. PubMed ID: 16437286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Investigation of basic imaging properties in digital radiography. 8. Detection of simulated low-contrast objects in digital subtraction angiographic images.
    Ohara K; Chan HP; Doi K; Giger ML; Fujita H
    Med Phys; 1986; 13(3):304-11. PubMed ID: 3724689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Occlusal caries: Evaluation of direct microscopy versus digital imaging used for two histological classification systems.
    Jablonski-Momeni A; Ricketts DN; Stachniss V; Maschka R; Heinzel-Gutenbrunner M; Pieper K
    J Dent; 2009 Mar; 37(3):204-11. PubMed ID: 19124186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effect of bit depth and kVp of digital radiography for detection of subtle differences.
    Heo MS; Choi DH; Benavides E; Huh KH; Yi WJ; Lee SS; Choi SC
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Aug; 108(2):278-83. PubMed ID: 19272812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison of slow scan television and direct viewing of radiographs.
    Roberts JM; House AM; Canning EM
    J Can Assoc Radiol; 1981 Jun; 32(2):114-7. PubMed ID: 7251615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A level crossing enhancement scheme for chest radiograph images.
    Nagesha ; Kumar GH
    Comput Biol Med; 2007 Oct; 37(10):1455-60. PubMed ID: 17374367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Optimization of image quality and dose for Varian aS500 electronic portal imaging devices (EPIDs).
    McGarry CK; Grattan MW; Cosgrove VP
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Dec; 52(23):6865-77. PubMed ID: 18029980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Fractal-feature distance as a substitute for observer performance index in contrast-detail examination.
    Imai K; Ikeda M; Enchi Y; Niimi T
    Eur J Radiol; 2008 Sep; 67(3):541-5. PubMed ID: 17689214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Preserving digital images for legal proceedings.
    Benedetto AR
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2007 Dec; 4(12):897-905. PubMed ID: 18047986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Auto-shutter of CR/DR images and applications in the post-image processing of PACS].
    Gao BB; Zhang JG
    Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi; 2006 Mar; 30(2):106-8. PubMed ID: 16830801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Signal-to-noise ratio or the number of perceptible grey tones in the x-ray picture. II: Information content and viewing conditions].
    Blendl C; Kierdorf M; Bollen R; Freytag KH
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1993 Sep; 3(5):286-91. PubMed ID: 8399415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.