BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

278 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16461507)

  • 1. Data analysis from a multi-centre, comparative study of angiographic examinations leading to practical guidelines for the optimisation of patient doses.
    Struelens L; Vanhavere F; Bosmans H; Van Loon R; Geukens M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):87-92. PubMed ID: 16461507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A study of the correlation between dose area product and effective dose in vascular radiology.
    Smans K; Struelens L; Hoornaert MT; Bleeser F; Buls N; Berus D; Clerinx P; Malchair F; Vanhavere F; Bosmans H
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 130(3):300-8. PubMed ID: 18310610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Method of patient dose evaluation in the angiographic and interventional radiology procedures.
    Rivolta A; Emanuelli S; Tessarin C; Bresciani S; Genovese MG; Rogge D; Scielzo G
    Radiol Med; 2005; 110(5-6):689-98. PubMed ID: 16437054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Patient radiation doses and references levels in interventional radiology.
    Brambilla M; Marano G; Dominietto M; Cotroneo AR; Carriero A
    Radiol Med; 2004 Apr; 107(4):408-18. PubMed ID: 15103292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Patient doses from noncardiac diagnostic and therapeutic interventional procedures.
    Tsalafoutas IA; Goni H; Maniatis PN; Pappas P; Bouzas N; Tzortzis G
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2006 Sep; 17(9):1489-98. PubMed ID: 16990469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An investigation into patient and staff doses from X-ray angiography during coronary interventional procedures.
    Morrish OW; Goldstone KE
    Br J Radiol; 2008 Jan; 81(961):35-45. PubMed ID: 18039722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Reduction of the radiation exposure of patients caused by selected interventional and angiographic procedures].
    Seifert H; el-Jamal A; Roth R; Urbanczyk K; Kramann B
    Rofo; 2000 Dec; 172(12):1057-64. PubMed ID: 11199435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dose performance evaluation of a charge coupled device and a flat-panel digital fluoroscopy system recently installed in an interventional cardiology laboratory.
    Tsapaki V; Kottou S; Kollaros N; Dafnomili P; Kyriakidis Z; Neofotistou V
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 111(3):297-304. PubMed ID: 15266080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Patient dose in interventional radiology: a European survey.
    Vano E; Järvinen H; Kosunen A; Bly R; Malone J; Dowling A; Larkin A; Padovani R; Bosmans H; Dragusin O; Jaschke W; Torbica P; Back C; Schreiner A; Bokou C; Kottou S; Tsapaki V; Jankowski J; Papierz S; Domienik J; Werduch A; Nikodemova D; Salat D; Kepler K; Bor MD; Vassileva J; Borisova R; Pellet S; Corbett RH
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):39-45. PubMed ID: 18287189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dose conversion coefficients calculated using tomographic phantom, KTMAN-2, for X-ray examination of cardiac catheterisation.
    Park SH; Lee JK; Lee C
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 128(3):351-8. PubMed ID: 17766255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Diagnostic and interventional radiology: a strategy to introduce reference dose level taking into account the national practice.
    Verdun FR; Aroua A; Trueb PR; Vock P; Valley JF
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):188-91. PubMed ID: 15933106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Are new technologies always reducing patient doses in cardiac procedures?
    Trianni A; Bernardi G; Padovani R
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):97-101. PubMed ID: 16461516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Protocols for dosimetry and patient reference levels.
    Faulkner K
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):195-8. PubMed ID: 16461510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Patient and staff doses in interventional X-ray procedures in Sweden.
    Persliden J
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):150-7. PubMed ID: 15933098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of a CCD and a flat-panel digital system in an Interventional Cardiology Laboratory.
    Tsapaki V; Kottou S; Kollaros N; Kyriakidis Z; Neofotistou V
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):93-6. PubMed ID: 16461500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Variations of patient doses in interventional examinations at different angiographic units.
    Bor D; Toklu T; Olğar T; Sancak T; Cekirge S; Onal B; Bilgiç S
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2006; 29(5):797-806. PubMed ID: 16718424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Investigation of possible methods for equipment self-tests in digital radiology.
    Zoetelief J; Idris HH; Jansen JT
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):269-73. PubMed ID: 16461526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Evaluation of patient doses in interventional radiology].
    Ropolo R; Rampado O; Isoardi P; Gandini G; Rabbia C; Righi D
    Radiol Med; 2001; 102(5-6):384-90. PubMed ID: 11779988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Variations of radiation dosage delivered to patients undergoing interventional cardiological procedures. A monocentric study 2002-05].
    Georges JL; Livarek B; Gibault-Genty G; Messaoudi H; Aziza JP; Hautecoeur JL; Soleille H
    Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 2007 Mar; 100(3):175-81. PubMed ID: 17536420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reference levels at European level for cardiac interventional procedures.
    Padovani R; Vano E; Trianni A; Bokou C; Bosmans H; Bor D; Jankowski J; Torbica P; Kepler K; Dowling A; Milu C; Tsapaki V; Salat D; Vassileva J; Faulkner K
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):104-7. PubMed ID: 18310612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.