189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16461516)
21. Dynamic flat panel detector versus image intensifier in cardiac imaging: dose and image quality.
Vano E; Geiger B; Schreiner A; Back C; Beissel J
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Dec; 50(23):5731-42. PubMed ID: 16306664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Level of patient and operator dose in the largest cardiac centre in Greece.
Tsapaki V; Patsilinakos S; Voudris V; Magginas A; Pavlidis S; Maounis T; Theodorakis G; Koutelou M; Vrantza T; Nearchou M; Nikolaki N; Kollaros N; Kyrozi E; Kottou S; Karaiskos P; Neofotistou E; Cokkinos D
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):71-3. PubMed ID: 18250202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparative performance evaluation of a flat detector and an image intensifier angiographic system both used for interventional cardiology procedures in adult and pediatric patients.
Kordolaimi SD; Salvara AL; Antonakos I; Tsalafoutas IA; Broutzos E; Efstathopoulos EP
Phys Med; 2013 Mar; 29(2):178-87. PubMed ID: 22398332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Impact of the X-ray system setting on patient dose and image quality; a case study with two interventional cardiology systems.
Vassileva J; Vano E; Ubeda C; Rehani M; Zotova R
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Jul; 155(3):329-34. PubMed ID: 23396881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The influence of patient size on patient doses in cardiology.
Kotre CJ; Reay J; Chapple CL
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):222-4. PubMed ID: 16461495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Efficacy of a minicourse in radiation-reducing techniques in invasive cardiology: a multicenter field study.
Kuon E; Weitmann K; Hoffmann W; Dörr M; Reffelmann T; Hummel A; Riad A; Busch MC; Empen K; Felix SB
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Apr; 7(4):382-90. PubMed ID: 24630883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Patient dosimetry approaches in interventional cardiology and literature dose data review.
Padovani R; Quai E
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):217-21. PubMed ID: 16461496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Radiation dose reduction without compromise of image quality in cardiac angiography and intervention with the use of a flat panel detector without an antiscatter grid.
Partridge J; McGahan G; Causton S; Bowers M; Mason M; Dalby M; Mitchell A
Heart; 2006 Apr; 92(4):507-10. PubMed ID: 16159965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Correlation of patient maximum skin doses in cardiac procedures with various dose indicators.
Domienik J; Papierz S; Jankowski J; Peruga JZ; Werduch A; Religa W
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 132(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 18818270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Long-term efficacy of a mini-course in radiation-reducing techniques in invasive cardiology.
Kuon E; Empen K; Weitmann K; Staudt A; Hummel A; Dörr M; Reffelmann T; Hoffmann W; Felix SB
Rofo; 2013 Aug; 185(8):720-5. PubMed ID: 23696018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. An investigation into patient and staff doses from X-ray angiography during coronary interventional procedures.
Morrish OW; Goldstone KE
Br J Radiol; 2008 Jan; 81(961):35-45. PubMed ID: 18039722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Correlation of patient and staff doses in interventional cardiology.
Tsapaki V; Kottou S; Vano E; Parviainen T; Padovani R; Dowling A; Molfetas M; Neofotistou V
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):26-9. PubMed ID: 16461537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison of a conventional and a flat-panel digital system in interventional cardiology procedures.
Tsapaki V; Kottou S; Kollaros N; Dafnomili P; Koutelou M; Vano E; Neofotistou V
Br J Radiol; 2004 Jul; 77(919):562-7. PubMed ID: 15238402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Quality criteria for cardiac images: an update.
Bernardi G; Bar O; Jezewski T; Vano E; Maccia C; Trianni A; Padovani R
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):87-90. PubMed ID: 18283064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Image quality criteria in cardiology.
Bernardi G; Padovani R; Spedicato L; Desmet W; Malisan MR; Giannuleas JD; Neofotistou E; Manginas A; Olivari Z; Cosgrave J; Alfonso F; Bosmans H; Dowling A; Vano E
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):102-6. PubMed ID: 16461497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Paediatric interventional cardiology: flat detector versus image intensifier using a test object.
Vano E; Ubeda C; Martinez LC; Leyton F; Miranda P
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Dec; 55(23):7287-97. PubMed ID: 21081824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Patient dosimetry during coronary interventions: a comprehensive analysis.
Efstathopoulos EP; Karvouni E; Kottou S; Tzanalaridou E; Korovesis S; Giazitzoglou E; Katritsis DG
Am Heart J; 2004 Mar; 147(3):468-75. PubMed ID: 14999196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Changes in dose-area product, entrance surface dose, and lens dose to the radiologist in a vascular interventional laboratory when an old X-ray system is exchanged with a new system.
Jensen K; Zangani L; Martinsen AC; Sandbæk G
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2011 Aug; 34(4):717-22. PubMed ID: 21069332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Assessment of effective dose and dose to the lens of the eye for the interventional cardiologist.
Lie ØØ; Paulsen GU; Wøhni T
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 132(3):313-8. PubMed ID: 19056809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Skin doses to patients undergoing coronary angiography in a Greek hospital.
Delichas MG; Psarrakos K; Giannoglou G; Molyvda-Athanasopoulou E; Hatziioannou K; Papanastassiou E
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 113(4):449-52. PubMed ID: 15797918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
