BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

346 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16461522)

  • 1. Dose optimisation in computed radiography.
    Schreiner-Karoussou A
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):139-42. PubMed ID: 16461522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Does digital imaging decrease patient dose? A pilot study and review of the literature.
    Neofotistou V; Tsapaki V; Kottou S; Schreiner-Karoussou A; Vano E
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):204-10. PubMed ID: 16464833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Optimising automatic exposure control in computed radiography and the impact on patient dose.
    Doyle P; Gentle D; Martin CJ
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):236-9. PubMed ID: 15933114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Retrospective patient dose analysis of a digital radiography system in routine clinical use.
    Schuncke A; Neitzel U
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):131-4. PubMed ID: 15933094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluating radiographic parameters for mobile chest computed radiography: phantoms, image quality and effective dose.
    Rill LN; Brateman L; Arreola M
    Med Phys; 2003 Oct; 30(10):2727-35. PubMed ID: 14596311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of x-ray tube potential on image quality and patient dose for lumbar spine computed radiography examinations.
    Brindhaban A; Al Khalifah K; Al Wathiqi G; Al Ostath H
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2005 Dec; 28(4):216-22. PubMed ID: 16506618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Patient dose, image quality and radiographic techniques for common X ray examinations in two Greek hospitals and comparison with European guidelines.
    Papadimitriou D; Perris A; Molfetas MG; Panagiotakis N; Manetou A; Tsourouflis G; Vassileva J; Chronopoulos P; Karapanagiotou O; Kottou S
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2001; 95(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 11468804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Optimisation of image plate radiography with respect to tube voltage.
    Tingberg A; Sjöström D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):286-93. PubMed ID: 15933123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Varied tube potential with constant effective dose at lumbar spine radiography using a flat-panel digital detector.
    Geijer H; Persliden J
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):240-5. PubMed ID: 15933115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Image quality and dose management in digital radiography: a new paradigm for optimisation.
    Busch HP; Faulkner K
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):143-7. PubMed ID: 16461521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Digital radiography in paediatrics: radiation dose considerations and magnitude of possible dose reduction.
    Hufton AP; Doyle SM; Carty HM
    Br J Radiol; 1998 Feb; 71(842):186-99. PubMed ID: 9579183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Estimation of patient doses for common diagnostic X-ray examinations in Latvian hospitals, analysis of radiographic techniques and comparison with European guidelines.
    Bogucarskis K; Salmins A; Gfirtner H; Anatschkowa E
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):176-9. PubMed ID: 15933103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparative study of adult patient doses in film screen and computed radiography in some Sudanese hospitals.
    Elshiekh E; Suliman II; Habbani F
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jul; 165(1-4):402-5. PubMed ID: 25889604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dose levels from thoracic and pelvic examinations in two pediatric radiological departments in Norway - a comparison study of dose-area product and radiographic technique.
    Sæther HK; Lagesen B; Trægde Martinsen AC; Holsen EP; Øvrebø KM
    Acta Radiol; 2010 Dec; 51(10):1137-42. PubMed ID: 20860497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A framework for optimising the radiographic technique in digital X-ray imaging.
    Samei E; Dobbins JT; Lo JY; Tornai MP
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):220-9. PubMed ID: 15933112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Collective effective dose from diagnostic radiology in Ukraine.
    Stadnyk L; Shalopa O; Nosyk O
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jul; 165(1-4):146-9. PubMed ID: 25848100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Performance evaluation of two computed radiography systems and patient dose in pelvic examination.
    Elshiekh E; Suliman II; Habbani F
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jul; 165(1-4):392-6. PubMed ID: 25836691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. AEC set-up optimisation with computed radiography imaging.
    Mazzocchi S; Belli G; Busoni S; Gori C; Menchi I; Salucci P; Taddeucci A; Zatelli G
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):169-73. PubMed ID: 16461503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Overview of patient dosimetry in diagnostic radiology in the USA for the past 50 years.
    Huda W; Nickoloff EL; Boone JM
    Med Phys; 2008 Dec; 35(12):5713-28. PubMed ID: 19175129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dose reduction in a paediatric X-ray department following optimization of radiographic technique.
    Mooney R; Thomas PS
    Br J Radiol; 1998 Aug; 71(848):852-60. PubMed ID: 9828798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.