These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16461526)

  • 1. Investigation of possible methods for equipment self-tests in digital radiology.
    Zoetelief J; Idris HH; Jansen JT
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):269-73. PubMed ID: 16461526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quality control of equipment used in digital and interventional radiology.
    Zoetelief J; van Soldt RT; Suliman II; Jansen JT; Bosmans H
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):277-82. PubMed ID: 16461518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Image-quality figure evaluator based on contrast-detail phantom in radiography.
    Wang CL; Wang CM; Chan YK; Chen RT
    Int J Med Robot; 2012 Jun; 8(2):169-77. PubMed ID: 22213357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Patient dosimetry and image quality in digital radiology from online audit of the X-ray system.
    Vano E; Fernandez JM; Ten JI; Gonzalez L; Guibelalde E; Prieto C
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):199-203. PubMed ID: 16461529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Data analysis from a multi-centre, comparative study of angiographic examinations leading to practical guidelines for the optimisation of patient doses.
    Struelens L; Vanhavere F; Bosmans H; Van Loon R; Geukens M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):87-92. PubMed ID: 16461507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Physical image quality comparison of four types of digital detector for chest radiology.
    Fernandez JM; Ordiales JM; Guibelalde E; Prieto C; Vano E
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):140-3. PubMed ID: 18283060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Method of patient dose evaluation in the angiographic and interventional radiology procedures.
    Rivolta A; Emanuelli S; Tessarin C; Bresciani S; Genovese MG; Rogge D; Scielzo G
    Radiol Med; 2005; 110(5-6):689-98. PubMed ID: 16437054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison between objective and subjective image quality measurements for a full field digital mammography system.
    Marshall NW
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 May; 51(10):2441-63. PubMed ID: 16675862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Analysis of image quality in digital chest imaging.
    De Hauwere A; Bacher K; Smeets P; Verstraete K; Thierens H
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):174-7. PubMed ID: 16461499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Does digital flat detector technology tip the scale towards better image quality or reduced patient dose in interventional cardiology?
    Bogaert E; Bacher K; Lapere R; Thierens H
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Nov; 72(2):348-53. PubMed ID: 18789622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Image quality measurements in radiology.
    Tapiovaara M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):116-9. PubMed ID: 16461535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A study of the correlation between dose area product and effective dose in vascular radiology.
    Smans K; Struelens L; Hoornaert MT; Bleeser F; Buls N; Berus D; Clerinx P; Malchair F; Vanhavere F; Bosmans H
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 130(3):300-8. PubMed ID: 18310610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Subjective and objective measures of image quality in digital fluoroscopy.
    Walsh C; Dowling A; Meade A; Malone J
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):34-7. PubMed ID: 16461534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Patient doses and image quality in digital chest radiology.
    Salát D; Nikodemová D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):147-9. PubMed ID: 18321878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Measurement of radiation dose in dental radiology.
    Helmrot E; Alm Carlsson G
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):168-71. PubMed ID: 15933101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Review of image quality standards to control digital X-ray systems.
    Schreiner-Karoussou A
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):23-5. PubMed ID: 16464831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Optimization of image quality and dose for Varian aS500 electronic portal imaging devices (EPIDs).
    McGarry CK; Grattan MW; Cosgrove VP
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Dec; 52(23):6865-77. PubMed ID: 18029980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Technical advances of interventional fluoroscopy and flat panel image receptor.
    Lin PJ
    Health Phys; 2008 Nov; 95(5):650-7. PubMed ID: 18849699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A software tool for increased efficiency in observer performance studies in radiology.
    Börjesson S; Håkansson M; Båth M; Kheddache S; Svensson S; Tingberg A; Grahn A; Ruschin M; Hemdal B; Mattsson S; Månsson LG
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):45-52. PubMed ID: 15933080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An examination of automatic exposure control regimes for two digital radiography systems.
    Marshall NW
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Aug; 54(15):4645-70. PubMed ID: 19590115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.