These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16461526)

  • 21. An investigation of flat panel equipment variables on image quality with a dedicated cardiac phantom.
    Dragusin O; Bosmans H; Pappas C; Desmet W
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Sep; 53(18):4927-40. PubMed ID: 18711249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Radiographic quality control devices.
    Health Devices; 2000 Apr; 29(4):97-139. PubMed ID: 11002439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Evaluation of a software package for automated quality assessment of contrast detail images--comparison with subjective visual assessment.
    Pascoal A; Lawinski CP; Honey I; Blake P
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Dec; 50(23):5743-57. PubMed ID: 16306665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Dual-energy cardiac imaging: an image quality and dose comparison for a flat-panel detector and x-ray image intensifier.
    Ducote JL; Xu T; Molloi S
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jan; 52(1):183-96. PubMed ID: 17183135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Management of pediatric radiation dose using GE fluoroscopic equipment.
    Belanger B; Boudry J
    Pediatr Radiol; 2006 Sep; 36 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):204-11. PubMed ID: 16862403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Quantitative assessment of computed radiography quality control parameters.
    Rampado O; Isoardi P; Ropolo R
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Mar; 51(6):1577-93. PubMed ID: 16510964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The application of image quality measurements for digital angiography.
    Peterzol A; Padovani R; Quai E; Vano E; Prieto C; Aviles P
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):38-43. PubMed ID: 16461533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Experimental evaluation of fiber-interspaced antiscatter grids for large patient imaging with digital x-ray systems.
    Fetterly KA; Schueler BA
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Aug; 52(16):4863-80. PubMed ID: 17671340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Deconvolution of x-ray phase contrast images as a way to retrieve phase information lost due to insufficient resolution.
    Olivo A; Speller RD
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Aug; 54(15):N347-54. PubMed ID: 19590117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Characterization of the phase-contrast radiography edge-enhancement effect in a cabinet x-ray system.
    Donnelly EF; Lewis KG; Wolske KM; Pickens DR; Price RR
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Jan; 51(1):21-30. PubMed ID: 16357428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Problems with film processing in medical X-ray imaging in Lithuania.
    Sniureviciute M; Adliene D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):260-3. PubMed ID: 15933118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Bulgarian experience in the establishment of reference dose levels and implementation of a quality control system in diagnostic radiology.
    Vassileva J; Dimov A; Slavchev A; Karadjov A
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):131-4. PubMed ID: 16464832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Doses measured using AEC on direct digital radiographic (DDR) X-rays systems: updated results with an RP 162 perspective.
    Bowden L; Faulkner R; Gallagher A; O'Connor U; Walsh C; Dowling A; O'Reilly G
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Feb; 153(2):251-4. PubMed ID: 23175645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Radiation exposure of children in pediatric radiology. Part 4: Entrance doses achieved during the X-ray examination of the chest].
    Seidenbusch MC; Schneider K
    Rofo; 2008 Dec; 180(12):1082-103. PubMed ID: 19009497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Performance evaluation and testing of digital intra-oral radiographic systems.
    Doyle P; Finney L
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):313-7. PubMed ID: 16461488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Cassette based digital X-ray systems: evaluating the Konica Minolta Xpress CR.
    Health Devices; 2005 Nov; 34(11):365-77. PubMed ID: 16454117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Assessing the validity of modulation transfer function evaluation techniques with application to small area and scanned digital detectors.
    Price BD; Esbrand CJ; Olivo A; Gibson AP; Hebden JC; Speller RD; Royle GJ
    Rev Sci Instrum; 2008 Nov; 79(11):113103. PubMed ID: 19045885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Exposure variability and image quality in computed radiography.
    Fauber TL
    Radiol Technol; 2009; 80(3):209-15. PubMed ID: 19153197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Implementation of quality assurance in diagnostic radiology in Bosnia and Herzegovina (Republic of Srpska).
    Bosnjak J; Ciraj-Bjelac O; Strbac B
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):249-52. PubMed ID: 18283063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Dosage monitoring as a quality control instrument in digital radiography].
    Kurtz C; Czapp W; Klose KJ
    Rofo; 1998 Nov; 169(5):465-70. PubMed ID: 9849594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.