These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16461526)

  • 41. Dose conversion coefficients calculated using tomographic phantom, KTMAN-2, for X-ray examination of cardiac catheterisation.
    Park SH; Lee JK; Lee C
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 128(3):351-8. PubMed ID: 17766255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Patient dose in digital projection radiography.
    Compagnone G; Pagan L; Baleni MC; Calzolaio FL; Barozzi L; Bergamini C
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):135-7. PubMed ID: 18252850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. ICRP recommendations on 'Managing patient dose in digital radiology'.
    Vano E
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):126-30. PubMed ID: 15933093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. A comparative study of quality control in diagnostic radiology.
    Kharita MH; Khedr MS; Wannus KM
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 130(4):447-51. PubMed ID: 18385180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Quality assurance of computed and digital radiography systems.
    Walsh C; Gorman D; Byrne P; Larkin A; Dowling A; Malone JF
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):271-5. PubMed ID: 18319281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Image quality measurements and metrics in full field digital mammography: an overview.
    Bosmans H; Carton AK; Rogge F; Zanca F; Jacobs J; Van Ongeval C; Nijs K; Van Steen A; Marchal G
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):120-30. PubMed ID: 16461531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. A quantitative image quality comparison of four different image guided radiotherapy devices.
    Stützel J; Oelfke U; Nill S
    Radiother Oncol; 2008 Jan; 86(1):20-4. PubMed ID: 18031854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Parallelized Bayesian inversion for three-dimensional dental X-ray imaging.
    Kolehmainen V; Vanne A; Siltanen S; Järvenpää S; Kaipio JP; Lassas M; Kalke M
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2006 Feb; 25(2):218-28. PubMed ID: 16468456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Review of relationships between physical measurements and user evaluation of image quality.
    Tapiovaara MJ
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):244-8. PubMed ID: 18252851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Film retakes in digital and conventional radiography.
    Akhtar W; Aslam M; Ali A; Mirza K; Ahmad N
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2008 Mar; 18(3):151-3. PubMed ID: 18460242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Quality control and patient dosimetry in digital radiology. On line system: new features and transportability.
    Vano E; Ten JI; Fernandez JM; Prieto C; Ordiales JM; Martinez D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):144-6. PubMed ID: 18283057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. MRI quality control tools for procedures and analyses.
    Di Nallo AM; Ortenzia O; D'Arienzo M; Coniglio D; Benassi M
    J Exp Clin Cancer Res; 2006 Mar; 25(1):121-7. PubMed ID: 16761628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Skin entrance radiation dose in an interventional radiology procedure.
    Chu RY; Thomas G; Maqbool F
    Health Phys; 2006 Jul; 91(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 16775479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Calibrating automatic exposure control devices for digital radiography.
    Doyle P; Martin CJ
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Nov; 51(21):5475-85. PubMed ID: 17047264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Quality assurance (QA) procedures for software: evaluation of an ADC quality system.
    Efstathopoulos EP; Benekos O; Molfetas M; Charou E; Kottou S; Argentos S; Kelekis NL
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):291-7. PubMed ID: 16464840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Importance of dose settings in the x-ray systems used for interventional radiology: a national survey.
    Vano E; Sanchez R; Fernandez JM; Rosales F; Garcia MA; Sotil J; Hernandez J; Carrera F; Ciudad J; Soler MM; Ballester T
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2009 Jan; 32(1):121-6. PubMed ID: 19052816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. A quality assurance phantom for the performance evaluation of volumetric micro-CT systems.
    Du LY; Umoh J; Nikolov HN; Pollmann SI; Lee TY; Holdsworth DW
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Dec; 52(23):7087-108. PubMed ID: 18029995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Implementation of acceptability criteria for dental radiology in Belgium.
    Clarijs T
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Feb; 153(2):260-3. PubMed ID: 23175642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Protocols for dosimetry and patient reference levels.
    Faulkner K
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):195-8. PubMed ID: 16461510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Dose and quality control (DQC) in diagnostic radiology.
    Holloway AF; Taylor KW; Hobbs BB
    J Can Assoc Radiol; 1984 Jun; 35(2):149-53. PubMed ID: 6480667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.