These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

356 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16461529)

  • 1. Patient dosimetry and image quality in digital radiology from online audit of the X-ray system.
    Vano E; Fernandez JM; Ten JI; Gonzalez L; Guibelalde E; Prieto C
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):199-203. PubMed ID: 16461529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quality control and patient dosimetry in digital radiology. On line system: new features and transportability.
    Vano E; Ten JI; Fernandez JM; Prieto C; Ordiales JM; Martinez D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):144-6. PubMed ID: 18283057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Patient doses and image quality in digital chest radiology.
    Salát D; Nikodemová D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):147-9. PubMed ID: 18321878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quality control of equipment used in digital and interventional radiology.
    Zoetelief J; van Soldt RT; Suliman II; Jansen JT; Bosmans H
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):277-82. PubMed ID: 16461518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Managing patient dose in digital radiology. A report of the International Commission on Radiological Protection.
    International Commission on Radiological Protection
    Ann ICRP; 2004; 34(1):1-73. PubMed ID: 15302167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Experience with patient dosimetry and quality control online for diagnostic and interventional radiology using DICOM services.
    Vano E; Ten JI; Fernandez-Soto JM; Sanchez-Casanueva RM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Apr; 200(4):783-90. PubMed ID: 23521449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Analysis of image quality in digital chest imaging.
    De Hauwere A; Bacher K; Smeets P; Verstraete K; Thierens H
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):174-7. PubMed ID: 16461499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. 3-Dimensional rotational X-ray imaging, 3D-RX: image quality and patient dose simulation for optimisation studies.
    Kroon JN
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):341-9. PubMed ID: 15933134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bulgarian experience in the establishment of reference dose levels and implementation of a quality control system in diagnostic radiology.
    Vassileva J; Dimov A; Slavchev A; Karadjov A
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):131-4. PubMed ID: 16464832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Protocols for dosimetry and patient reference levels.
    Faulkner K
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):195-8. PubMed ID: 16461510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Problems with film processing in medical X-ray imaging in Lithuania.
    Sniureviciute M; Adliene D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):260-3. PubMed ID: 15933118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Investigation of possible methods for equipment self-tests in digital radiology.
    Zoetelief J; Idris HH; Jansen JT
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):269-73. PubMed ID: 16461526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dual-energy cardiac imaging: an image quality and dose comparison for a flat-panel detector and x-ray image intensifier.
    Ducote JL; Xu T; Molloi S
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jan; 52(1):183-96. PubMed ID: 17183135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. High kilovoltage digital exposure techniques and patient dosimetry.
    Fauber TL; Cohen TF; Dempsey MC
    Radiol Technol; 2011; 82(6):501-10. PubMed ID: 21771934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reference levels for image quality in mammography.
    Zdesar U
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):170-2. PubMed ID: 18375465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Technical advances of interventional fluoroscopy and flat panel image receptor.
    Lin PJ
    Health Phys; 2008 Nov; 95(5):650-7. PubMed ID: 18849699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. On the use of DICOM cine header information for optimisation: results from the 2002 European DIMOND cardiology survey.
    Vano E; Padovani R; Bernardi G; Ten JI; Peterzol A; Dowling A; Bosmans H; Kottou S; Olivari Z; Faulkner K; Balter S
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):162-5. PubMed ID: 16461506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A factorial experiment on image quality and radiation dose.
    Norrman E; Persliden J
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):246-52. PubMed ID: 15933116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Optimization of chest radiographic imaging parameters: a comparison of image quality and entrance skin dose for digital chest radiography systems.
    Sun Z; Lin C; Tyan Y; Ng KH
    Clin Imaging; 2012; 36(4):279-86. PubMed ID: 22726965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Physical image quality comparison of four types of digital detector for chest radiology.
    Fernandez JM; Ordiales JM; Guibelalde E; Prieto C; Vano E
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):140-3. PubMed ID: 18283060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.