These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

254 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16461535)

  • 21. Purchasing computer systems need not be so difficult.
    Khorasani R
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 Feb; 1(2):142-3. PubMed ID: 17411544
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Image quality, compression and segmentation in medicine.
    Morgan P; Frankish C
    J Audiov Media Med; 2002 Dec; 25(4):149-54. PubMed ID: 12554293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Quality assurance (QA) procedures for software: evaluation of an ADC quality system.
    Efstathopoulos EP; Benekos O; Molfetas M; Charou E; Kottou S; Argentos S; Kelekis NL
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):291-7. PubMed ID: 16464840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Deconvolution of x-ray phase contrast images as a way to retrieve phase information lost due to insufficient resolution.
    Olivo A; Speller RD
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Aug; 54(15):N347-54. PubMed ID: 19590117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Artifacts in digital mammography.
    Van Ongeval C; Jacobs J; Bosmans H
    JBR-BTR; 2008; 91(6):262-3. PubMed ID: 19203002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Dual-energy cardiac imaging: an image quality and dose comparison for a flat-panel detector and x-ray image intensifier.
    Ducote JL; Xu T; Molloi S
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jan; 52(1):183-96. PubMed ID: 17183135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Implementation of quality assurance in diagnostic radiology in Bosnia and Herzegovina (Republic of Srpska).
    Bosnjak J; Ciraj-Bjelac O; Strbac B
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):249-52. PubMed ID: 18283063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Review of relationships between physical measurements and user evaluation of image quality.
    Tapiovaara MJ
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):244-8. PubMed ID: 18252851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Patient doses and image quality in digital chest radiology.
    Salát D; Nikodemová D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):147-9. PubMed ID: 18321878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Optimage central organised image quality control including statistics and reporting.
    Jahnen A; Schilz C; Shannoun F; Schreiner A; Hermen J; Moll C
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):253-7. PubMed ID: 18252849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A comparison between objective and subjective image quality measurements for a full field digital mammography system.
    Marshall NW
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 May; 51(10):2441-63. PubMed ID: 16675862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Remote diagnosis raises efficiency of radiology.
    Stark DD; Crues JV
    Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1993 Nov; 15(11):91-8, 103-4, 179. PubMed ID: 10146494
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Windowed image reconstruction for time-of-flight positron emission tomography.
    Kao CM
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Jul; 53(13):3431-45. PubMed ID: 18547913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Digital mammography: performance evaluation parameters and available systems in France].
    Stines J; Noel A; Heid P
    J Radiol; 2007; 88(7-8 Pt 1):933-42. PubMed ID: 17878849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Computer-assisted methods of space filtration of radioisotope images].
    Meier VP; Syrokvashin VA; El'kind EIu
    Nov Med Tekh; 1975; (1):44-9. PubMed ID: 799778
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Multisphere phantom and analysis algorithm for PET image quality assessment.
    Wilson JM; Turkington TG
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Jun; 53(12):3267-78. PubMed ID: 18506071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The role of open-source software in innovation and standardization in radiology.
    Erickson BJ; Langer S; Nagy P
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2005 Nov; 2(11):927-31. PubMed ID: 17411967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Virtual organization in the digital age of radiology - principle and solution for radiologic research?].
    Leppek R; Krass S; Bourquain H; Lang M; Wein B; Mildenberger P; Schaller S; Klose KJ; Peitgen HO
    Rofo; 2003 Nov; 175(11):1556-63. PubMed ID: 14610709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Compression of digital images in radiology - results of a consensus conference].
    Loose R; Braunschweig R; Kotter E; Mildenberger P; Simmler R; Wucherer M
    Rofo; 2009 Jan; 181(1):32-7. PubMed ID: 19115165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Digital imaging: the Agfa experience.
    Anrijs H
    J Belge Radiol; 1997 Aug; 80(4):196-8. PubMed ID: 9351313
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.