These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16461974)

  • 1. Presentation of diagnostic test accuracy.
    Brotman DJ
    Ann Intern Med; 2006 Feb; 144(3):221; author reply 221-2. PubMed ID: 16461974
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Presentation of diagnostic test accuracy.
    Broce M; Reyes B
    Ann Intern Med; 2006 Feb; 144(3):220-1; author reply 221-2. PubMed ID: 16461972
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A randomized trial of ways to describe test accuracy: the effect on physicians' post-test probability estimates.
    Puhan MA; Steurer J; Bachmann LM; ter Riet G
    Ann Intern Med; 2005 Aug; 143(3):184-9. PubMed ID: 16061916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of diagnostic tests for infectious diseases: general principles.
    ; Banoo S; Bell D; Bossuyt P; Herring A; Mabey D; Poole F; Smith PG; Sriram N; Wongsrichanalai C; Linke R; O'Brien R; Perkins M
    Nat Rev Microbiol; 2008 Nov; 6(11 Suppl):S16-26. PubMed ID: 22745954
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Roaming through methodology. XXXII. False test results].
    van der Weijden T; van den Akker M
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2001 May; 145(19):906-8. PubMed ID: 11387865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cochran's Q test was useful to assess heterogeneity in likelihood ratios in studies of diagnostic accuracy.
    Cohen JF; Chalumeau M; Cohen R; Korevaar DA; Khoshnood B; Bossuyt PM
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Mar; 68(3):299-306. PubMed ID: 25441698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Estimates of diagnostic accuracy efficacy: how well can this test perform the classification task?
    Trop I; Stolberg HO; Nahmias C
    Can Assoc Radiol J; 2003 Apr; 54(2):80-6. PubMed ID: 12736916
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Evaluation of added value of diagnostic tests].
    Knol A
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2000 Aug; 144(33):1608. PubMed ID: 10965371
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Interpretation of efficacy measures derived from 2 X 2 tables for the evaluation of diagnostic tests and treatment].
    Bender R
    Med Klin (Munich); 2001 Feb; 96(2):116-21. PubMed ID: 11253283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. General radiologists' diagnostic accuracy: incomplete presentation of data casts doubt on study's conclusions.
    Zivian MT; Gershater R; Erly WK; Ashdown BC; Lucio RW
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Feb; 184(2):697-9. PubMed ID: 15671405
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Verification problems in diagnostic accuracy studies: consequences and solutions.
    de Groot JA; Bossuyt PM; Reitsma JB; Rutjes AW; Dendukuri N; Janssen KJ; Moons KG
    BMJ; 2011 Aug; 343():d4770. PubMed ID: 21810869
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Correcting for verification bias in studies of a diagnostic test's accuracy.
    Zhou XH
    Stat Methods Med Res; 1998 Dec; 7(4):337-53. PubMed ID: 9871951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Measuring diagnostic and predictive accuracy in disease management: an introduction to receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.
    Linden A
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2006 Apr; 12(2):132-9. PubMed ID: 16579821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The leaf plot: a novel way of presenting the value of tests.
    Coulthard MG; Coulthard T
    Br J Gen Pract; 2019 Apr; 69(681):205-206. PubMed ID: 30858331
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Evaluation of diagnostic methods].
    Doyon F; Hill C
    J Radiol; 2001 Feb; 82(2):117-25. PubMed ID: 11428206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Good interpretation of the results of a diagnostic test.
    Veziris N; Jarlier V
    Clin Infect Dis; 2003 Oct; 37(8):1143; author reply 1143-4. PubMed ID: 14523783
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Interpreting diagnostic accuracy studies for patient care.
    Mallett S; Halligan S; Thompson M; Collins GS; Altman DG
    BMJ; 2012 Jul; 345():e3999. PubMed ID: 22750423
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Basic principles of diagnostic evaluation].
    Cohen J; Dubos F; Bossuyt P; Chalumeau M; Levy C; Martinot A
    Arch Pediatr; 2015 May; 22(5 Suppl 1):186-7. PubMed ID: 26112584
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Clinical use of diagnostic tests (Part 1): Analysis of the properties of a diagnostic test].
    Cerda L J; Cifuentes A L
    Rev Chilena Infectol; 2010 Jun; 27(3):205-8. PubMed ID: 20737121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of diagnostic tests without gold standards.
    Hui SL; Zhou XH
    Stat Methods Med Res; 1998 Dec; 7(4):354-70. PubMed ID: 9871952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.