424 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16462155)
1. Update on the Gleason grading system for prostate cancer: results of an international consensus conference of urologic pathologists.
Epstein JI; Allsbrook WC; Amin MB; Egevad LL
Adv Anat Pathol; 2006 Jan; 13(1):57-9. PubMed ID: 16462155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The impact of the 2005 international society of urological pathology consensus conference on standard Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma in needle biopsies.
Billis A; Guimaraes MS; Freitas LL; Meirelles L; Magna LA; Ferreira U
J Urol; 2008 Aug; 180(2):548-52; discussion 552-3. PubMed ID: 18550106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. What's new in prostate cancer disease assessment in 2006?
Epstein JI
Curr Opin Urol; 2006 May; 16(3):146-51. PubMed ID: 16679850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Gleason grading of prostate cancer in needle biopsies or radical prostatectomy specimens: contemporary approach, current clinical significance and sources of pathology discrepancies.
Montironi R; Mazzuccheli R; Scarpelli M; Lopez-Beltran A; Fellegara G; Algaba F
BJU Int; 2005 Jun; 95(8):1146-52. PubMed ID: 15877724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Implications of the International Society of Urological Pathology modified Gleason grading system.
Egevad L; Mazzucchelli R; Montironi R
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2012 Apr; 136(4):426-34. PubMed ID: 22458905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Usefulness of the 2005 International Society of Urologic Pathology Gleason grading system in prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens.
Uemura H; Hoshino K; Sasaki T; Miyoshi Y; Ishiguro H; Inayama Y; Kubota Y
BJU Int; 2009 May; 103(9):1190-4. PubMed ID: 19076142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Contemporary Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma: An Update With Discussion on Practical Issues to Implement the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma.
Epstein JI; Amin MB; Reuter VE; Humphrey PA
Am J Surg Pathol; 2017 Apr; 41(4):e1-e7. PubMed ID: 28177964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Increasing the number of biopsies increases the concordance of Gleason scores of needle biopsies and prostatectomy specimens.
Divrik RT; Eroglu A; Sahin A; Zorlu F; Ozen H
Urol Oncol; 2007; 25(5):376-82. PubMed ID: 17826653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A contemporary study correlating prostate needle biopsy and radical prostatectomy Gleason score.
Fine SW; Epstein JI
J Urol; 2008 Apr; 179(4):1335-8; discussion 1338-9. PubMed ID: 18289601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Grading prostate cancer.
Bostwick DG
Am J Clin Pathol; 1994 Oct; 102(4 Suppl 1):S38-56. PubMed ID: 7524306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An update of the Gleason grading system.
Epstein JI
J Urol; 2010 Feb; 183(2):433-40. PubMed ID: 20006878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. High-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasialike ductal adenocarcinoma of the prostate: a clinicopathologic study of 28 cases.
Tavora F; Epstein JI
Am J Surg Pathol; 2008 Jul; 32(7):1060-7. PubMed ID: 18496142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Gleason grading: past, present and future.
Delahunt B; Miller RJ; Srigley JR; Evans AJ; Samaratunga H
Histopathology; 2012 Jan; 60(1):75-86. PubMed ID: 22212079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prognostic and predictive factors and reporting of prostate carcinoma in prostate needle biopsy specimens.
Amin M; Boccon-Gibod L; Egevad L; Epstein JI; Humphrey PA; Mikuz G; Newling D; Nilsson S; Sakr W; Srigley JR; Wheeler TM; Montironi R
Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl; 2005 May; (216):20-33. PubMed ID: 16019757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma: urologic pathologists.
Allsbrook WC; Mangold KA; Johnson MH; Lane RB; Lane CG; Amin MB; Bostwick DG; Humphrey PA; Jones EC; Reuter VE; Sakr W; Sesterhenn IA; Troncoso P; Wheeler TM; Epstein JI
Hum Pathol; 2001 Jan; 32(1):74-80. PubMed ID: 11172298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The impact of the 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) consensus on Gleason grading in contemporary practice.
Zareba P; Zhang J; Yilmaz A; Trpkov K
Histopathology; 2009 Oct; 55(4):384-91. PubMed ID: 19817888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Improved accuracy in predicting the presence of Gleason pattern 4/5 prostate cancer by three-dimensional 26-core systematic biopsy.
Numao N; Kawakami S; Yokoyama M; Yonese J; Arisawa C; Ishikawa Y; Ando M; Fukui I; Kihara K
Eur Urol; 2007 Dec; 52(6):1663-8. PubMed ID: 17240041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Impact on the clinical outcome of prostate cancer by the 2005 international society of urological pathology modified Gleason grading system.
Dong F; Wang C; Farris AB; Wu S; Lee H; Olumi AF; McDougal WS; Young RH; Wu CL
Am J Surg Pathol; 2012 Jun; 36(6):838-43. PubMed ID: 22592143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Multiple prostate cancer cores with different Gleason grades submitted in the same specimen container without specific site designation: should each core be assigned an individual Gleason score?
Kunju LP; Daignault S; Wei JT; Shah RB
Hum Pathol; 2009 Apr; 40(4):558-64. PubMed ID: 19144380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A web-based tutorial improves practicing pathologists' Gleason grading of images of prostate carcinoma specimens obtained by needle biopsy: validation of a new medical education paradigm.
Kronz JD; Silberman MA; Allsbrook WC; Epstein JI
Cancer; 2000 Oct; 89(8):1818-23. PubMed ID: 11042578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
