116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16462435)
1. The mechanics of polymethylmethacrylate augmentation.
Kayanja M; Evans K; Milks R; Lieberman IH
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2006 Feb; 443():124-30. PubMed ID: 16462435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biomechanical evaluation of kyphoplasty with calcium sulfate cement in a cadaveric osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture model.
Perry A; Mahar A; Massie J; Arrieta N; Garfin S; Kim C
Spine J; 2005; 5(5):489-93. PubMed ID: 16153574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Vertebroplasty: only small cement volumes are required to normalize stress distributions on the vertebral bodies.
Luo J; Daines L; Charalambous A; Adams MA; Annesley-Williams DJ; Dolan P
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Dec; 34(26):2865-73. PubMed ID: 20010394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biomechanical changes after the augmentation of experimental osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures in the cadaveric thoracic spine.
Kayanja MM; Togawa D; Lieberman IH
Spine J; 2005; 5(1):55-63. PubMed ID: 15653085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Is kyphoplasty better than vertebroplasty in restoring normal mechanical function to an injured spine?
Luo J; Bertram W; Sangar D; Adams MA; Annesley-Williams DJ; Dolan P
Bone; 2010 Apr; 46(4):1050-7. PubMed ID: 20004264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biomechanical effects of unipedicular vertebroplasty on intact vertebrae.
Higgins KB; Harten RD; Langrana NA; Reiter MF
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Jul; 28(14):1540-7; discussion 1548. PubMed ID: 12865841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mechanical efficacy of vertebroplasty: influence of cement type, BMD, fracture severity, and disc degeneration.
Luo J; Skrzypiec DM; Pollintine P; Adams MA; Annesley-Williams DJ; Dolan P
Bone; 2007 Apr; 40(4):1110-9. PubMed ID: 17229596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effect of vertebral body percentage fill on mechanical behavior during percutaneous vertebroplasty.
Molloy S; Mathis JM; Belkoff SM
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Jul; 28(14):1549-54. PubMed ID: 12865843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biomechanical evaluation of the vertebral jack tool and the inflatable bone tamp for reduction of osteoporotic spine fractures.
Sietsma MS; Hosman AJ; Verdonschot NJ; Aalsma AM; Veldhuizen AG
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Aug; 34(18):E640-4. PubMed ID: 19680089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Adjacent level load transfer following vertebral augmentation in the cadaveric spine.
Kayanja MM; Evans K; Milks R; Lieberman IH
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Oct; 31(21):E790-7. PubMed ID: 17023840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biomechanical comparison of augmentation techniques for insufficiency fractures.
McCann H; LePine M; Glaser J
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Jul; 31(15):E499-502. PubMed ID: 16816750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Biomechanical comparison of transpedicular versus extrapedicular vertebroplasty using polymethylmethacrylate.
Erkan S; Wu C; Mehbod AA; Cho W; Transfeldt EE
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2010 May; 23(3):180-5. PubMed ID: 20065863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of bone density on vertebral strength and stiffness after percutaneous vertebroplasty.
Graham J; Ahn C; Hai N; Buch BD
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Aug; 32(18):E505-11. PubMed ID: 17700430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evolution of bone mineral density after percutaneous kyphoplasty in fresh osteoporotic vertebral body fractures and adjacent vertebrae along with sagittal spine alignment.
Korovessis P; Zacharatos S; Repantis T; Michael A; Karachalios D
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Jun; 21(4):293-8. PubMed ID: 18525491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Biomechanical evaluation of an injectable radiopaque polypropylene fumarate cement for kyphoplasty in a cadaveric osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture model.
Kim C; Mahar A; Perry A; Massie J; Lu L; Currier B; Yaszemski MJ
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2007 Dec; 20(8):604-9. PubMed ID: 18046174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effect of cement augmentation on the geometry and structural response of recovered osteopenic vertebrae: an anterior-wedge fracture model.
Alkalay RN; von Stechow D; Torres K; Hassan S; Sommerich R; Zurakowski D
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jul; 33(15):1627-36. PubMed ID: 18594454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Kyphoplasty reduction of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: correction of local kyphosis versus overall sagittal alignment.
Pradhan BB; Bae HW; Kropf MA; Patel VV; Delamarter RB
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Feb; 31(4):435-41. PubMed ID: 16481954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Retrospective review of biopsy results following percutaneous fixation of vertebral compression fractures.
Schoenfeld AJ; Dinicola NJ; Ehrler DM; Koerber A; Paxos M; Shorten SD; Bowers J; Jackson E; Smith MJ
Injury; 2008 Mar; 39(3):327-33. PubMed ID: 17880977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The biomechanics of 1, 2, and 3 levels of vertebral augmentation with polymethylmethacrylate in multilevel spinal segments.
Kayanja MM; Schlenk R; Togawa D; Ferrara L; Lieberman I
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Apr; 31(7):769-74. PubMed ID: 16582850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty: filler materials.
Lieberman IH; Togawa D; Kayanja MM
Spine J; 2005; 5(6 Suppl):305S-316S. PubMed ID: 16291128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
