BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

244 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16462438)

  • 1. Trends and variations in the use of spine surgery.
    Deyo RA; Mirza SK
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2006 Feb; 443():139-46. PubMed ID: 16462438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Trends and variations in cervical spine surgery in the United States: Medicare beneficiaries, 1992 to 2005.
    Wang MC; Kreuter W; Wolfla CE; Maiman DJ; Deyo RA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Apr; 34(9):955-61; discussion 962-3. PubMed ID: 19352223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Are lumbar spine reoperation rates falling with greater use of fusion surgery and new surgical technology?
    Martin BI; Mirza SK; Comstock BA; Gray DT; Kreuter W; Deyo RA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Sep; 32(19):2119-26. PubMed ID: 17762814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Geographic variation in lumbar fusion for degenerative disorders: 1990 to 2000.
    Cook C; Santos GC; Lima R; Pietrobon R; Jacobs DO; Richardson W
    Spine J; 2007; 7(5):552-7. PubMed ID: 17905317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reoperation rates following lumbar spine surgery and the influence of spinal fusion procedures.
    Martin BI; Mirza SK; Comstock BA; Gray DT; Kreuter W; Deyo RA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Feb; 32(3):382-7. PubMed ID: 17268274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Population-based trends in volumes and rates of ambulatory lumbar spine surgery.
    Gray DT; Deyo RA; Kreuter W; Mirza SK; Heagerty PJ; Comstock BA; Chan L
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Aug; 31(17):1957-63; discussion 1964. PubMed ID: 16924213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Changes in the utilization of spinal fusion in the United States.
    Cowan JA; Dimick JB; Wainess R; Upchurch GR; Chandler WF; La Marca F
    Neurosurgery; 2006 Jul; 59(1):15-20; discussion 15-20. PubMed ID: 16823295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. United States' trends and regional variations in lumbar spine surgery: 1992-2003.
    Weinstein JN; Lurie JD; Olson PR; Bronner KK; Fisher ES
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Nov; 31(23):2707-14. PubMed ID: 17077740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Controversies about instrumented surgery and pain relief in degenerative lumbar spine pain. Results of scientific evidence].
    Robaina-PadrĂ³n FJ
    Neurocirugia (Astur); 2007 Oct; 18(5):406-13. PubMed ID: 18008014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Utilization changes following market entry by physician-owned specialty hospitals.
    Mitchell JM
    Med Care Res Rev; 2007 Aug; 64(4):395-415. PubMed ID: 17684109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Development of an index to characterize the "invasiveness" of spine surgery: validation by comparison to blood loss and operative time.
    Mirza SK; Deyo RA; Heagerty PJ; Konodi MA; Lee LA; Turner JA; Goodkin R
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Nov; 33(24):2651-61; discussion 2662. PubMed ID: 18981957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Complications and mortality associated with cervical spine surgery for degenerative disease in the United States.
    Wang MC; Chan L; Maiman DJ; Kreuter W; Deyo RA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Feb; 32(3):342-7. PubMed ID: 17268266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Trends of spinal fusion surgery in Australia: 1997 to 2006.
    Harris IA; Dao AT
    ANZ J Surg; 2009 Nov; 79(11):783-8. PubMed ID: 20078526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Visual loss after spine surgery: a population-based study.
    Patil CG; Lad EM; Lad SP; Ho C; Boakye M
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jun; 33(13):1491-6. PubMed ID: 18520945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. SF-36 PCS benefit-cost ratio of lumbar fusion comparison to other surgical interventions: a thought experiment.
    Polly DW; Glassman SD; Schwender JD; Shaffrey CI; Branch C; Burkus JK; Gornet MF;
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 May; 32(11 Suppl):S20-6. PubMed ID: 17495582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative charge analysis of one- and two-level lumbar total disc arthroplasty versus circumferential lumbar fusion.
    Levin DA; Bendo JA; Quirno M; Errico T; Goldstein J; Spivak J
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Dec; 32(25):2905-9. PubMed ID: 18246016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Postoperative bracing after spine surgery for degenerative conditions: a questionnaire study.
    Bible JE; Biswas D; Whang PG; Simpson AK; Rechtine GR; Grauer JN
    Spine J; 2009 Apr; 9(4):309-16. PubMed ID: 18790685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Lumbar fusion outcomes stratified by specific diagnostic indication.
    Glassman SD; Carreon LY; Djurasovic M; Dimar JR; Johnson JR; Puno RM; Campbell MJ
    Spine J; 2009; 9(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 18805059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impact of body habitus on perioperative morbidity associated with fusion of the thoracolumbar and lumbar spine.
    Shamji MF; Parker S; Cook C; Pietrobon R; Brown C; Isaacs RE
    Neurosurgery; 2009 Sep; 65(3):490-8; discussion 498. PubMed ID: 19687694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Financial incentives for lumbar surgery: a critical analysis of physician reimbursement for decompression and fusion procedures.
    Whang PG; Lim MR; Sasso RC; Skelton A; Brown ZB; Greg Anderson D; Albert TJ; Hilibrand AS; Vaccaro AR
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Aug; 21(6):381-6. PubMed ID: 18679090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.