381 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16462560)
1. Fixation of periprosthetic femoral shaft fractures associated with cemented femoral stems: a biomechanical comparison of locked plating and conventional cable plates.
Fulkerson E; Koval K; Preston CF; Iesaka K; Kummer FJ; Egol KA
J Orthop Trauma; 2006 Feb; 20(2):89-93. PubMed ID: 16462560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of hybrid plating with locked and nonlocked screws on the strength of locked plating constructs in the osteoporotic diaphysis.
Doornink J; Fitzpatrick DC; Boldhaus S; Madey SM; Bottlang M
J Trauma; 2010 Aug; 69(2):411-7. PubMed ID: 20699751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Biomechanical evaluation of fracture fixation constructs using a variable-angle locked periprosthetic femur plate system.
Hoffmann MF; Burgers TA; Mason JJ; Williams BO; Sietsema DL; Jones CB
Injury; 2014 Jul; 45(7):1035-41. PubMed ID: 24680467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cyclic loading of periprosthetic fracture fixation constructs.
Talbot M; Zdero R; Schemitsch EH
J Trauma; 2008 May; 64(5):1308-12. PubMed ID: 18469655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A biomechanical study comparing cortical onlay allograft struts and plates in the treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures.
Wilson D; Frei H; Masri BA; Oxland TR; Duncan CP
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2005 Jan; 20(1):70-6. PubMed ID: 15567539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A biomechanical comparison of periprosthetic femoral fracture fixation in normal and osteoporotic cadaveric bone.
Demos HA; Briones MS; White PH; Hogan KA; Barfield WR
J Arthroplasty; 2012 May; 27(5):783-8. PubMed ID: 22014657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A biomechanical comparison of locked plate fixation with percutaneous insertion capability versus the angled blade plate in a subtrochanteric fracture gap model.
Crist BD; Khalafi A; Hazelwood SJ; Lee MA
J Orthop Trauma; 2009 Oct; 23(9):622-7. PubMed ID: 19897982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Fixation of periprosthetic femoral shaft fractures occurring at the tip of the stem: a biomechanical study of 5 techniques.
Dennis MG; Simon JA; Kummer FJ; Koval KJ; DiCesare PE
J Arthroplasty; 2000 Jun; 15(4):523-8. PubMed ID: 10884215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fixation of diaphyseal fractures with a segmental defect: a biomechanical comparison of locked and conventional plating techniques.
Fulkerson E; Egol KA; Kubiak EN; Liporace F; Kummer FJ; Koval KJ
J Trauma; 2006 Apr; 60(4):830-5. PubMed ID: 16612304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biomechanical comparison of polyaxial-type locking plates and a fixed-angle locking plate for internal fixation of distal femur fractures.
Otto RJ; Moed BR; Bledsoe JG
J Orthop Trauma; 2009 Oct; 23(9):645-52. PubMed ID: 19897986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Locking versus nonlocking T-plates for dorsal and volar fixation of dorsally comminuted distal radius fractures: a biomechanical study.
Trease C; McIff T; Toby EB
J Hand Surg Am; 2005 Jul; 30(4):756-63. PubMed ID: 16039369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A nonlocking end screw can decrease fracture risk caused by locked plating in the osteoporotic diaphysis.
Bottlang M; Doornink J; Byrd GD; Fitzpatrick DC; Madey SM
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2009 Mar; 91(3):620-7. PubMed ID: 19255222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biomechanical analysis of blade plate versus locking plate fixation for a proximal humerus fracture: comparison using cadaveric and synthetic humeri.
Siffri PC; Peindl RD; Coley ER; Norton J; Connor PM; Kellam JF
J Orthop Trauma; 2006 Sep; 20(8):547-54. PubMed ID: 16990726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Vertically oriented femoral neck fractures: mechanical analysis of four fixation techniques.
Aminian A; Gao F; Fedoriw WW; Zhang LQ; Kalainov DM; Merk BR
J Orthop Trauma; 2007 Sep; 21(8):544-8. PubMed ID: 17805021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of a novel, nonspanning external fixator for treatment of unstable extra-articular fractures of the distal radius: biomechanical comparison with a volar locking plate.
Strauss EJ; Banerjee D; Kummer FJ; Tejwani NC
J Trauma; 2008 Apr; 64(4):975-81. PubMed ID: 18404064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The biomechanics of ipsilateral intertrochanteric and femoral shaft fractures: a comparison of 5 fracture fixation techniques.
McConnell A; Zdero R; Syed K; Peskun C; Schemitsch E
J Orthop Trauma; 2008 Sep; 22(8):517-24. PubMed ID: 18758281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biomechanical analysis of distal femur fracture fixation: fixed-angle screw-plate construct versus condylar blade plate.
Higgins TF; Pittman G; Hines J; Bachus KN
J Orthop Trauma; 2007 Jan; 21(1):43-6. PubMed ID: 17211268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biomechanical evaluation of periprosthetic femoral fracture fixation.
Zdero R; Walker R; Waddell JP; Schemitsch EH
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2008 May; 90(5):1068-77. PubMed ID: 18451400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fixation of periprosthetic femoral shaft fractures: a biomechanical comparison of two techniques.
Dennis MG; Simon JA; Kummer FJ; Koval KJ; Di Cesare PE
J Orthop Trauma; 2001; 15(3):177-80. PubMed ID: 11265007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Are locking screws advantageous with plate fixation of humeral shaft fractures? A biomechanical analysis of synthetic and cadaveric bone.
O'Toole RV; Andersen RC; Vesnovsky O; Alexander M; Topoleski LD; Nascone JW; Sciadini MF; Turen C; Eglseder WA
J Orthop Trauma; 2008; 22(10):709-15. PubMed ID: 18978547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
