184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16463303)
1. Acute neurobehavioral effects of exposure to static magnetic fields: analyses of exposure-response relations.
de Vocht F; Stevens T; van Wendel-de-Joode B; Engels H; Kromhout H
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Mar; 23(3):291-7. PubMed ID: 16463303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Health effects of occupational exposure to static magnetic fields used in magnetic resonance imaging: a review].
Franco G; Perduri R; Murolo A
Med Lav; 2008; 99(1):16-28. PubMed ID: 18254536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Neurobehavioral effects among subjects exposed to high static and gradient magnetic fields from a 1.5 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging system--a case-crossover pilot study.
de Vocht F; van-Wendel-de-Joode B; Engels H; Kromhout H
Magn Reson Med; 2003 Oct; 50(4):670-4. PubMed ID: 14523950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Personal exposure to static and time-varying magnetic fields during MRI system test procedures.
de Vocht F; Muller F; Engels H; Kromhout H
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 Nov; 30(5):1223-8. PubMed ID: 19856458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Analysis and measurements of magnetic field exposures for healthcare workers in selected MR environments.
Fuentes MA; Trakic A; Wilson SJ; Crozier S
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2008 Apr; 55(4):1355-64. PubMed ID: 18390326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Behavioral effects on rats of high strength magnetic fields generated by a resistive electromagnet.
Houpt TA; Pittman DW; Riccardi C; Cassell JA; Lockwood DR; Barranco JM; Kwon B; Smith JC
Physiol Behav; 2005 Oct; 86(3):379-89. PubMed ID: 16176822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Feasibility of cardiac gating free of interference with electro-magnetic fields at 1.5 Tesla, 3.0 Tesla and 7.0 Tesla using an MR-stethoscope.
Frauenrath T; Hezel F; Heinrichs U; Kozerke S; Utting JF; Kob M; Butenweg C; Boesiger P; Niendorf T
Invest Radiol; 2009 Sep; 44(9):539-47. PubMed ID: 19652614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Exposure, health complaints and cognitive performance among employees of an MRI scanners manufacturing department.
de Vocht F; van Drooge H; Engels H; Kromhout H
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Feb; 23(2):197-204. PubMed ID: 16374876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cognitive effects of head-movements in stray fields generated by a 7 Tesla whole-body MRI magnet.
de Vocht F; Stevens T; Glover P; Sunderland A; Gowland P; Kromhout H
Bioelectromagnetics; 2007 May; 28(4):247-55. PubMed ID: 17290435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [ECG changes caused by the effect of static magnetic fields of nuclear magnetic resonance tomography using magnets with a field power of 0.5 to 4.0 Telsa].
Weikl A; Moshage W; Hentschel D; Schittenhelm R; Bachmann K
Z Kardiol; 1989 Sep; 78(9):578-86. PubMed ID: 2815912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Measurement of electric fields induced in a human subject due to natural movements in static magnetic fields or exposure to alternating magnetic field gradients.
Glover PM; Bowtell R
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Jan; 53(2):361-73. PubMed ID: 18184992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Psychological effects of chronic exposure to 50 Hz magnetic fields in humans living near extra-high-voltage transmission lines.
Beale IL; Pearce NE; Conroy DM; Henning MA; Murrell KA
Bioelectromagnetics; 1997; 18(8):584-94. PubMed ID: 9383247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Experimental evaluation of the occupational exposure to static magnetic fields on a 3 T magnetic resonance scanner].
Moro L; Alabiso F; Parisoli F; Frigerio F
G Ital Med Lav Ergon; 2013; 35(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 23798231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Safety of human MRI at static fields above the FDA 8 T guideline: sodium imaging at 9.4 T does not affect vital signs or cognitive ability.
Atkinson IC; Renteria L; Burd H; Pliskin NH; Thulborn KR
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Nov; 26(5):1222-7. PubMed ID: 17969172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Possible mutagenic effects of magnetic fields].
Teichmann EM; Hengstler JG; Schreiber WG; Akbari W; Georgi H; Hehn M; Schiffer I; Oesch F; Spiess HW; Thelen M
Rofo; 2000 Nov; 172(11):934-9. PubMed ID: 11142128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Systematic variation of off-resonance prepulses for clinical magnetization transfer contrast imaging at 0.2, 1.5, and 3.0 tesla.
Martirosian P; Boss A; Deimling M; Kiefer B; Schraml C; Schwenzer NF; Claussen CD; Schick F
Invest Radiol; 2008 Jan; 43(1):16-26. PubMed ID: 18097273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in an open low-field magnetic resonance imaging system: clinical experience and technical considerations.
Szelényi A; Gasser T; Seifert V
Neurosurgery; 2008 Oct; 63(4 Suppl 2):268-75; discussion 275-6. PubMed ID: 18981832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Model studies for evaluating the acute neurobehavioral effects of complex hydrocarbon solvents I. Validation of methods with ethanol.
McKee RH; Lammers JH; Hoogendijk EM; Emmen HH; Muijser H; Barsotti DA; Owen DE; Kulig BM
Neurotoxicology; 2006 Dec; 27(6):1064-79. PubMed ID: 16831461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Observation of changes in neural activity due to the static magnetic field of an MRI scanner.
Toyomaki A; Yamamoto T
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Nov; 26(5):1216-21. PubMed ID: 17969171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Exposure to static magnetic field and health hazards during the operation of magnetic resonance scanners].
Karpowicz J; Gryz K; Politański P; Zmyślony M
Med Pr; 2011; 62(3):309-21. PubMed ID: 21870421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
