These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

291 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16463341)

  • 1. Acoustic noise characteristics of a 4 Telsa MRI scanner.
    More SR; Lim TC; Li M; Holland CK; Boyce SE; Lee JH
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Mar; 23(3):388-97. PubMed ID: 16463341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Echo planar imaging at 4 Tesla with minimum acoustic noise.
    Tomasi DG; Ernst T
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2003 Jul; 18(1):128-30. PubMed ID: 12815648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Acoustic noise analysis in echo planar imaging: multicenter trial and comparison with other pulse sequences.
    Miyati T; Banno T; Fujita H; Mase M; Narita H; Imazawa M; Ohba S
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1999 Aug; 18(8):733-6. PubMed ID: 10534055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Acoustic FMRI noise: linear time-invariant system model.
    Rizzo Sierra CV; Versluis MJ; Hoogduin JM; Duifhuis HD
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2008 Sep; 55(9):2115-23. PubMed ID: 18713680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The acoustic hood: a patient-independent device improving acoustic noise protection during neonatal magnetic resonance imaging.
    Nordell A; Lundh M; Horsch S; Hallberg B; Aden U; Nordell B; Blennow M
    Acta Paediatr; 2009 Aug; 98(8):1278-83. PubMed ID: 19432831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Measurement and evaluation of the acoustic noise of a 3 Tesla MR scanner.
    Hattori Y; Fukatsu H; Ishigaki T
    Nagoya J Med Sci; 2007 Jan; 69(1-2):23-8. PubMed ID: 17378177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Efficacy of passive acoustic screening: implications for the design of imager and MR-suite.
    Moelker A; Vogel MW; Pattynama PM
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2003 Feb; 17(2):270-5. PubMed ID: 12541235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Acoustic noise transfer function in clinical MRI a multicenter analysis.
    Hamaguchi T; Miyati T; Ohno N; Hirano M; Hayashi N; Gabata T; Matsui O; Matsushita T; Yamamoto T; Fujiwara Y; Kimura H; Takeda H; Takehara Y
    Acad Radiol; 2011 Jan; 18(1):101-6. PubMed ID: 21145030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Single point imaging with suppressed sound pressure levels through gradient-shape adjustment.
    Latta P; Gruwel ML; Edie E; Srámek M; Tomanek B
    J Magn Reson; 2004 Oct; 170(2):177-83. PubMed ID: 15388078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An efficient feedback active noise control algorithm based on reduced-order linear predictive modeling of FMRI acoustic noise.
    Kannan G; Milani AA; Panahi IM; Briggs RW
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2011 Dec; 58(12):3303-9. PubMed ID: 21134809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Enhancing the acquisition efficiency of fast magnetic resonance imaging via broadband encoding of signal content.
    Mitsouras D; Zientara GP; Edelman A; Rybicki FJ
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Nov; 24(9):1209-27. PubMed ID: 17071343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Background MR gradient noise and non-auditory BOLD activations: a data-driven perspective.
    Haller S; Homola GA; Scheffler K; Beckmann CF; Bartsch AJ
    Brain Res; 2009 Jul; 1282():74-83. PubMed ID: 19505438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Shaping and timing gradient pulses to reduce MRI acoustic noise.
    Segbers M; Rizzo Sierra CV; Duifhuis H; Hoogduin JM
    Magn Reson Med; 2010 Aug; 64(2):546-53. PubMed ID: 20665798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging acoustic noise reduction technology by magnetic gradient waveform control.
    Yamashiro T; Morita K; Nakajima K
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Nov; 63():170-177. PubMed ID: 31425801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Scanning for the scanner: FMRI of audition by read-out omissions from echo-planar imaging.
    Bartsch AJ; Homola G; Thesen S; Sahmer P; Keim R; Beckmann CF; Biller A; Knaus C; Bendszus M
    Neuroimage; 2007 Mar; 35(1):234-43. PubMed ID: 17188900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Analysis of magnetic resonance imaging acoustic noise generated by a 4.7 T experimental system.
    Counter SA; Olofsson A; Borg E; Bjelke B; Häggström A; Grahn HF
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2000 Sep; 120(6):739-43. PubMed ID: 11099151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Adaptive speech enhancement using directional microphone in a 4-T MRI scanner.
    Sun G; Li M; Rudd BW; Lim TC; Osterhage J; Fugate EM; Lee JH
    MAGMA; 2015 Oct; 28(5):473-84. PubMed ID: 25894814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Importance of bone-conducted sound transmission on patient hearing in the MR scanner.
    Moelker A; Maas RA; Vogel MW; Ouhlous M; Pattynama PM
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 Jul; 22(1):163-9. PubMed ID: 15971178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Acoustic noise in functional magnetic resonance imaging reduces pain unpleasantness ratings.
    Boyle Y; Bentley DE; Watson A; Jones AK
    Neuroimage; 2006 Jul; 31(3):1278-83. PubMed ID: 16517183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sound level dependence of auditory evoked potentials: simultaneous EEG recording and low-noise fMRI.
    Thaerig S; Behne N; Schadow J; Lenz D; Scheich H; Brechmann A; Herrmann CS
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2008 Mar; 67(3):235-41. PubMed ID: 17707939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.