These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16463531)

  • 1. Analysis of response repetition as an error-correction strategy during sight-word reading.
    Worsdell AS; Iwata BA; Dozier CL; Johnson AD; Neidert PL; Thomason JL
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2005; 38(4):511-27. PubMed ID: 16463531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of active student response during error correction on the acquisition, maintenance, and generalization of sight words by students with developmental disabilities.
    Barbetta PM; Heron TE; Heward WL
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1993; 26(1):111-9. PubMed ID: 8473250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Relative effects of whole-word and phonetic-prompt error correction on the acquisition and maintenance of sight words by students with developmental disabilities.
    Barbetta PM; Heward WL; Bradley DM
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1993; 26(1):99-110. PubMed ID: 8473263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of immediate and delayed error correction on the acquisition and maintenance of sight words by students with developmental disabilities.
    Barbetta PM; Heward WL; Bradley DM; Miller AD
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1994; 27(1):177-8. PubMed ID: 8188560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of response and trial repetition on sight-word training for students with learning disabilities.
    Belfiore PJ; Skinner CH; Ferkis MA
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1995; 28(3):347-8. PubMed ID: 7592153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Facilitation of the acquisition and retention of sight-word vocabulary through token reinforcement.
    Lahey BB; Drabman RS
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1974; 7(2):307-12. PubMed ID: 4436178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of error correction during assessment probes on the acquisition of sight words for students with moderate intellectual disabilities.
    Waugh RE; Alberto PA; Fredrick LD
    Res Dev Disabil; 2011; 32(1):47-57. PubMed ID: 20884169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of sight word training procedures with validation of the most practical procedure in teaching reading for daily living.
    Lalli JS; Browder DM
    Res Dev Disabil; 1993; 14(2):107-27. PubMed ID: 8469800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Can pictures promote the acquisition of sight-word reading? An evaluation of two potential instructional strategies.
    Richardson AR; Lerman DC; Nissen MA; Luck KM; Neal AE; Bao S; Tsami L
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2017 Jan; 50(1):67-86. PubMed ID: 27687014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Brief experimental analysis of sight word interventions: a comparison of acquisition and maintenance of detected interventions.
    Baranek A; Fienup DM; Pace G
    Behav Modif; 2011 Jan; 35(1):78-94. PubMed ID: 21177519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sight word reading in children with developmental disabilities: a comparison of paired associate and picture-to-text matching instruction.
    Fossett B; Mirenda P
    Res Dev Disabil; 2006; 27(4):411-29. PubMed ID: 16112841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of Reading Racetracks on Sight Word Acquisition for Deaf Kindergarteners.
    Davenport CA; Konrad M; Alber-Morgan SR
    J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 2019 Apr; 24(2):173-185. PubMed ID: 30597048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An analysis of error-correction procedures during discrimination training.
    Rodgers TA; Iwata BA
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1991; 24(4):775-81. PubMed ID: 1797779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of two error-correction procedures on oral reading errors. Word supply versus sentence repeat.
    Singh NN
    Behav Modif; 1990 Apr; 14(2):188-99. PubMed ID: 2331242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Review of research on sight word instruction.
    Browder DM; Lalli JS
    Res Dev Disabil; 1991; 12(3):203-28. PubMed ID: 1792355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of response practice variables on learning spelling and sight vocabulary.
    Cuvo AJ; Ashley KM; Marso KJ; Zhang BL; Fry TA
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1995; 28(2):155-73. PubMed ID: 16795862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fast and slow namers: benefits of segmentation and whole word training.
    Levy BA; Bourassa DC; Horn C
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1999 Jun; 73(2):115-38. PubMed ID: 10328861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Becoming a written word: eye movements reveal order of acquisition effects following incidental exposure to new words during silent reading.
    Joseph HS; Wonnacott E; Forbes P; Nation K
    Cognition; 2014 Oct; 133(1):238-48. PubMed ID: 25058413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Process dissociation of sight vocabulary and phonetic decoding in reading: a new perspective on surface and phonological dyslexias.
    McDougall P; Borowsky R; MacKinnon GE; Hymel S
    Brain Lang; 2005 Feb; 92(2):185-203. PubMed ID: 15629491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Measurement scale influences in the evaluation of sight-word reading interventions.
    Yaw J; Skinner CH; Delisle J; Skinner AL; Maurer K; Cihak D; Wilhoit B; Booher J
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2014; 47(2):360-79. PubMed ID: 24763971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.