These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16464322)

  • 1. Opportunistic and systematic screening for chlamydia: a study of consultations by young adults in general practice.
    Salisbury C; Macleod J; Egger M; McCarthy A; Patel R; Holloway A; Ibrahim F; Sterne JA; Horner P; Low N
    Br J Gen Pract; 2006 Feb; 56(523):99-103. PubMed ID: 16464322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Can we evaluate population screening strategies in UK general practice? A pilot randomised controlled trial comparing postal and opportunistic screening for genital chlamydial infection.
    Senok A; Wilson P; Reid M; Scoular A; Craig N; McConnachie A; Fitzpatrick B; MacDonald A
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 2005 Mar; 59(3):198-204. PubMed ID: 15709078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Coverage and uptake of systematic postal screening for genital Chlamydia trachomatis and prevalence of infection in the United Kingdom general population: cross sectional study.
    Macleod J; Salisbury C; Low N; McCarthy A; Sterne JA; Holloway A; Patel R; Sanford E; Morcom A; Horner P; Davey Smith G; Skidmore S; Herring A; Caul O; Hobbs FD; Egger M
    BMJ; 2005 Apr; 330(7497):940. PubMed ID: 15809231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of a systematic postal screening and treatment service for genital Chlamydia trachomatis, with remote clinic access via the internet: a cross-sectional study, East of England.
    Bracebridge S; Bachmann MO; Ramkhelawon K; Woolnough A
    Sex Transm Infect; 2012 Aug; 88(5):375-81. PubMed ID: 22375045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Overcoming the barriers to chlamydia screening in general practice--a qualitative study.
    McNulty CA; Freeman E; Howell-Jones R; Hogan A; Randall S; Ford-Young W; Beckwith P; Oliver I
    Fam Pract; 2010 Jun; 27(3):291-302. PubMed ID: 20308246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Where do young adults want opportunistic chlamydia screening services to be located?
    Brugha R; Balfe M; Jeffares I; Conroy RM; Clarke E; Fitzgerald M; O'Connell E; Vaughan D; Coleman C; McGee H; Gillespie P; O'Donovan D
    J Public Health (Oxf); 2011 Dec; 33(4):571-8. PubMed ID: 21486871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. General practice funding to improve provision of adolescent primary sexual health care in New Zealand: results from an observational intervention.
    Morgan J; Haar J
    Sex Health; 2009 Sep; 6(3):203-7. PubMed ID: 19653956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Computer reminders for Chlamydia screening in general practice: a randomized controlled trial.
    Walker J; Fairley CK; Walker SM; Gurrin LC; Gunn JM; Pirotta MV; Carter R; Hocking JS
    Sex Transm Dis; 2010 Jul; 37(7):445-50. PubMed ID: 20375930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Healthcare and patient costs of a proactive chlamydia screening programme: the Chlamydia Screening Studies project.
    Robinson S; Roberts T; Barton P; Bryan S; Macleod J; McCarthy A; Egger M; Sanford E; Low N;
    Sex Transm Infect; 2007 Jul; 83(4):276-81. PubMed ID: 17229792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An evaluation of the impact of a national health demonstration project on testing and management for Chlamydia trachomatis infections in two regions of Scotland.
    Penney GC; Brace V; Cameron S; Tucker J
    Public Health; 2005 Nov; 119(11):1031-8. PubMed ID: 16084540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The chlamydia screening studies: rationale and design.
    Low N; McCarthy A; Macleod J; Salisbury C; Horner PJ; Roberts TE; Campbell R; Herring A; Skidmore S; Sanford E; Sterne JA; Davey Smith G; Graham A; Huengsberg M; Ross J; Egger M
    Sex Transm Infect; 2004 Oct; 80(5):342-8. PubMed ID: 15459400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Opportunistic screening of young men for urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis infection in general practice.
    Andersen B; Eidner PO; Hagensen D; Lomborg S; Hoff G
    Scand J Infect Dis; 2005; 37(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 15764188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Establishing the National Chlamydia Screening Programme in England: results from the first full year of screening.
    LaMontagne DS; Fenton KA; Randall S; Anderson S; Carter P
    Sex Transm Infect; 2004 Oct; 80(5):335-41. PubMed ID: 15459399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Postal urine specimens: are they a feasible method for genital chlamydial infection screening?
    Macleod J; Rowsell R; Horner P; Crowley T; Caul EO; Low N; Smith GD
    Br J Gen Pract; 1999 Jun; 49(443):455-8. PubMed ID: 10562745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Exploring attitudes and practices of General Practice staff towards offers of opportunistic screening for chlamydia: a UK survey.
    Wallace L; McNulty C; Hogan A; Bayley J
    Prim Health Care Res Dev; 2012 Jul; 13(3):255-68. PubMed ID: 22781053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prevalence of urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis increases significantly with level of urbanisation and suggests targeted screening approaches: results from the first national population based study in the Netherlands.
    van Bergen J; Götz HM; Richardus JH; Hoebe CJ; Broer J; Coenen AJ;
    Sex Transm Infect; 2005 Feb; 81(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 15681716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Systematic home screening for Chlamydia trachomatis infections of asymptomatic men and women in family practice by means of mail-in urine samples].
    van Valkengoed IG; Boeke AJ; van den Brule AJ; Morré SA; Dekker JH; Meijer CJ; van Eijk JT
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1999 Mar; 143(13):672-6. PubMed ID: 10321300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Opportunistic screening for genital infections with Chlamydia trachomatis among the sexually active population of Amsterdam. Il Over 90% participation and almost 5% prevalence].
    van den Hoek JA; Mulder-Folkerts DK; Coutinho RA; Dukers NH; Buimer M; van Doornum GJ
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1999 Mar; 143(13):668-72. PubMed ID: 10321299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Opportunistic screening for Chlamydia at a community based contraceptive service for young people.
    Moens V; Baruch G; Fearon P
    BMJ; 2003 Jun; 326(7401):1252-5. PubMed ID: 12791743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Screening university students for genital chlamydial infection: another lesson to learn.
    Aldeen T; Jacobs J; Powell R
    Sex Health; 2010 Dec; 7(4):491-4. PubMed ID: 21062592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.