These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16464550)

  • 1. Evidence of pitch processing in the N100m component of the auditory evoked field.
    Seither-Preisler A; Patterson R; Krumbholz K; Seither S; Lütkenhöner B
    Hear Res; 2006 Mar; 213(1-2):88-98. PubMed ID: 16464550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sensitivity of the neuromagnetic N100m deflection to spectral bandwidth: a function of the auditory periphery?
    Seither-Preisler A; Krumbholz K; Lütkenhöner B
    Audiol Neurootol; 2003; 8(6):322-37. PubMed ID: 14566103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Neuromagnetic evidence for a pitch processing center in Heschl's gyrus.
    Krumbholz K; Patterson RD; Seither-Preisler A; Lammertmann C; Lütkenhöner B
    Cereb Cortex; 2003 Jul; 13(7):765-72. PubMed ID: 12816892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Latency of auditory evoked field deflection N100m ruled by pitch or spectrum?
    Lütkenhöner B; Lammertmann C; Knecht S
    Audiol Neurootol; 2001; 6(5):263-78. PubMed ID: 11729329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Habituation of the auditory evoked field component N100m and its dependence on stimulus duration.
    Rosburg T; Haueisen J; Sauer H
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2002 Mar; 113(3):421-8. PubMed ID: 11897542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hemispheric differences in frequency dependent dipole orientation of the human auditory evoked field component N100m.
    Rosburg T; Kreitschmann-Andermahr I; Emmerich E; Nowak H; Sauer H
    Neurosci Lett; 1998 Dec; 258(2):105-8. PubMed ID: 9875538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Single-dipole analyses of the N100m are not suitable for characterizing the cortical representation of pitch.
    Lütkenhöner B
    Audiol Neurootol; 2003; 8(4):222-33. PubMed ID: 12811003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. N100m latency shortening caused by selective attention.
    Nomura Y; Kawase T; Kanno A; Nakasato N; Kawashima R; Katori Y
    Brain Res; 2021 Jan; 1751():147177. PubMed ID: 33121923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The auditory evoked magnetic fields to very high frequency tones.
    Fujioka T; Kakigi R; Gunji A; Takeshima Y
    Neuroscience; 2002; 112(2):367-81. PubMed ID: 12044454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Rapid change of tonotopic maps in the human auditory cortex during pitch discrimination.
    Ozaki I; Jin CY; Suzuki Y; Baba M; Matsunaga M; Hashimoto I
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Jul; 115(7):1592-604. PubMed ID: 15203060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Time course and hemispheric lateralization effects of complex pitch processing: evoked magnetic fields in response to rippled noise stimuli.
    Hertrich I; Mathiak K; Lutzenberger W; Ackermann H
    Neuropsychologia; 2004; 42(13):1814-26. PubMed ID: 15351630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Increased right auditory cortex activity in absolute pitch possessors.
    Hirose H; Kubota M; Kimura I; Yumoto M; Sakakihara Y
    Neuroreport; 2005 Nov; 16(16):1775-9. PubMed ID: 16237325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Neuromagnetic evidence for early auditory restoration of fundamental pitch.
    Monahan PJ; de Souza K; Idsardi WJ
    PLoS One; 2008 Aug; 3(8):e2900. PubMed ID: 18682843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. N100m in children possessing absolute pitch.
    Hirose H; Kubota M; Kimura I; Yumoto M; Sakakihara Y
    Neuroreport; 2003 May; 14(6):899-903. PubMed ID: 12858057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Interaction between the neuromagnetic responses to sound energy onset and pitch onset suggests common generators.
    Seither-Preisler A; Krumbholz K; Patterson R; Seither S; Lütkenhöner B
    Eur J Neurosci; 2004 Jun; 19(11):3073-80. PubMed ID: 15182315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Right hemispheric predominance in the segregation of mistuned partials.
    Hiraumi H; Nagamine T; Morita T; Naito Y; Fukuyama H; Ito J
    Eur J Neurosci; 2005 Oct; 22(7):1821-4. PubMed ID: 16197525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Variation in the phase of response to low-frequency pure tones in the guinea pig auditory nerve as functions of stimulus level and frequency.
    Palmer AR; Shackleton TM
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2009 Jun; 10(2):233-50. PubMed ID: 19093151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Preattentive cortical-evoked responses to pure tones, harmonic tones, and speech: influence of music training.
    Nikjeh DA; Lister JJ; Frisch SA
    Ear Hear; 2009 Aug; 30(4):432-46. PubMed ID: 19494778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Frequency-dependent fine structure in the frequency-following response: The byproduct of multiple generators.
    Tichko P; Skoe E
    Hear Res; 2017 May; 348():1-15. PubMed ID: 28137699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. N100m in adults possessing absolute pitch.
    Hirose H; Kubota M; Kimura I; Yumoto M; Sakakihara Y
    Neuroreport; 2004 Jun; 15(9):1383-6. PubMed ID: 15194857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.