These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

252 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16464840)

  • 1. Quality assurance (QA) procedures for software: evaluation of an ADC quality system.
    Efstathopoulos EP; Benekos O; Molfetas M; Charou E; Kottou S; Argentos S; Kelekis NL
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):291-7. PubMed ID: 16464840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quantitative assessment of computed radiography quality control parameters.
    Rampado O; Isoardi P; Ropolo R
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Mar; 51(6):1577-93. PubMed ID: 16510964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of a software package for automated quality assessment of contrast detail images--comparison with subjective visual assessment.
    Pascoal A; Lawinski CP; Honey I; Blake P
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Dec; 50(23):5743-57. PubMed ID: 16306665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Analysis of image quality in digital chest imaging.
    De Hauwere A; Bacher K; Smeets P; Verstraete K; Thierens H
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):174-7. PubMed ID: 16461499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Image quality and dose management in digital radiography: a new paradigm for optimisation.
    Busch HP; Faulkner K
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):143-7. PubMed ID: 16461521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessment and optimisation of the image quality of chest-radiography systems.
    Redlich U; Hoeschen C; Doehring W
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):264-8. PubMed ID: 15933119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Automated quality control in computed radiography.
    Ropolo R; Rampado O; Isoardi P; Izzo A; Savio L; Cammarota T; Davini O; De Lucchi R; Gandini G
    Radiol Med; 2006 Dec; 111(8):1156-67. PubMed ID: 17171519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Artifacts in digital mammography.
    Van Ongeval C; Jacobs J; Bosmans H
    JBR-BTR; 2008; 91(6):262-3. PubMed ID: 19203002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quality assurance of computed and digital radiography systems.
    Walsh C; Gorman D; Byrne P; Larkin A; Dowling A; Malone JF
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):271-5. PubMed ID: 18319281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Physical image quality comparison of four types of digital detector for chest radiology.
    Fernandez JM; Ordiales JM; Guibelalde E; Prieto C; Vano E
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):140-3. PubMed ID: 18283060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Long line positioning in neonates: does computed radiography improve visibility?
    Evans A; Natarajan J; Davies CJ
    Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed; 2004 Jan; 89(1):F44-5. PubMed ID: 14711855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Image quality criteria in cardiology.
    Bernardi G; Padovani R; Spedicato L; Desmet W; Malisan MR; Giannuleas JD; Neofotistou E; Manginas A; Olivari Z; Cosgrave J; Alfonso F; Bosmans H; Dowling A; Vano E
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):102-6. PubMed ID: 16461497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Objective performance testing and quality assurance of medical ultrasound equipment.
    Thijssen JM; Weijers G; de Korte CL
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2007 Mar; 33(3):460-71. PubMed ID: 17275983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A factorial experiment on image quality and radiation dose.
    Norrman E; Persliden J
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):246-52. PubMed ID: 15933116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Image quality in conventional chest radiography. Evaluation using the postprocessing tool Diamond View.
    Niemann T; Reisinger C; Rau P; Schwarz J; Ruis-Lopez L; Bongartz G
    Eur J Radiol; 2010 Mar; 73(3):555-9. PubMed ID: 19185438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. RADIUS--closing the circle on the assessment of imaging performance.
    Moores BM; Mattsson S; Månsson LG; Panzer W; Regulla D; Dance D; Alm Carlsson G; Verdun FR; Buhr E; Hoeschen C
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):450-7. PubMed ID: 15933154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Initial clinical experience with computed radiography imaging in an emergency department.
    Milos MJ; Aberle DR; Baraff LJ; Gold RH; Scanlan RL; Bassett LW
    Appl Radiol; 1989 Jan; 18(1):32-7. PubMed ID: 10292891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Exposure variability and image quality in computed radiography.
    Fauber TL
    Radiol Technol; 2009; 80(3):209-15. PubMed ID: 19153197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Comparison of input grey values and contrast profiles: a contribution to the discussion on optimization of evaluation parameters in storage phosphorus radiography].
    Schätzl M; Fink U
    Rofo; 1995 Feb; 162(2):157-62. PubMed ID: 7881084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Multidetector computed tomography chest examinations with low-kilovoltage protocols in adults: effect on image quality and radiation dose.
    Kim MJ; Park CH; Choi SJ; Hwang KH; Kim HS
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2009; 33(3):416-21. PubMed ID: 19478637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.