BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

429 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16464993)

  • 1. Developing a pressure ulcer risk assessment scale for patients in long-term care.
    Lepisto M; Eriksson E; Hietanen H; Lepisto J; Lauri S
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2006 Feb; 52(2):34-46. PubMed ID: 16464993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An interrater reliability study of the assessment of pressure ulcer risk using the Braden scale and the classification of pressure ulcers in a home care setting.
    Kottner J; Halfens R; Dassen T
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2009 Oct; 46(10):1307-12. PubMed ID: 19406400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Skin assessment and pressure ulcer care in hospital-based skilled nursing facilities.
    Siem CA; Wipke-Tevis DD; Rantz MJ; Popejoy LL
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2003 Jun; 49(6):42-4, 46, 48 passim, contd. PubMed ID: 12874483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Predicting pressure ulcer risk with the modified Braden, Braden, and Norton scales in acute care hospitals in Mainland China.
    Kwong E; Pang S; Wong T; Ho J; Shao-ling X; Li-jun T
    Appl Nurs Res; 2005 May; 18(2):122-8. PubMed ID: 15991112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Development of competency inventory for registered nurses in the People's Republic of China: scale development.
    Liu M; Kunaiktikul W; Senaratana W; Tonmukayakul O; Eriksen L
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2007 Jul; 44(5):805-13. PubMed ID: 16519890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessing risk and preventing pressure ulcers in patients with cancer.
    Lyder CH
    Semin Oncol Nurs; 2006 Aug; 22(3):178-84. PubMed ID: 16893747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Measuring nursing workload in neonatal intensive care.
    Spence K; Tarnow-Mordi W; Duncan G; Jayasuryia N; Elliott J; King J; Kite F
    J Nurs Manag; 2006 Apr; 14(3):227-34. PubMed ID: 16600012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Implementing a pressure ulcer prevention program and enhancing the role of the CWOCN: impact on outcomes.
    Hiser B; Rochette J; Philbin S; Lowerhouse N; Terburgh C; Pietsch C
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2006 Feb; 52(2):48-59. PubMed ID: 16464994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An interrater reliability study of the Braden scale in two nursing homes.
    Kottner J; Dassen T
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2008 Oct; 45(10):1501-11. PubMed ID: 18395726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Multisite Web-based training in using the Braden Scale to predict pressure sore risk.
    Magnan MA; Maklebust J
    Adv Skin Wound Care; 2008 Mar; 21(3):124-33. PubMed ID: 18388667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Examining the validity of pressure ulcer risk assessment scales: a replication study.
    Gould D; Goldstone L; Kelly D; Gammon J
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2004 Mar; 41(3):331-9. PubMed ID: 14967190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Non-blanchable erythema as an indicator for the need for pressure ulcer prevention: a randomized-controlled trial.
    Vanderwee K; Grypdonck M; Defloor T
    J Clin Nurs; 2007 Feb; 16(2):325-35. PubMed ID: 17239068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Do nurses promote urinary continence in hospitalized older people?: An exploratory study.
    Dingwall L; McLafferty E
    J Clin Nurs; 2006 Oct; 15(10):1276-86. PubMed ID: 16968432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Inter-rater reliability and Waterlow's pressure ulcer risk assessment tool.
    Kelly J
    Nurs Stand; 2005 Apr 20-26; 19(32):86-7, 90-2. PubMed ID: 15875591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The value of systematic evaluation in determining the effectiveness and practical utility of a pressure-redistributing support surface.
    Ward C
    J Tissue Viability; 2010 Feb; 19(1):22-7. PubMed ID: 20106665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pressure ulcer risk assessment immediately after cardiac surgery--does it make a difference? A comparison of three pressure ulcer risk assessment instruments within a cardiac surgery population.
    Feuchtinger J; Halfens R; Dassen T
    Nurs Crit Care; 2007; 12(1):42-9. PubMed ID: 17883663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reducing pressure ulcer prevalence rates in the long-term acute care setting.
    Milne CT; Trigilia D; Houle TL; Delong S; Rosenblum D
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2009 Apr; 55(4):50-9. PubMed ID: 19387096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Emotional care experienced by hospitalised patients: development and testing of a measurement instrument.
    Williams AM; Kristjanson LJ
    J Clin Nurs; 2009 Apr; 18(7):1069-77. PubMed ID: 19077011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Documenting the cognitive status of hip fracture patients using the Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire.
    Söderqvist A; Strömberg L; Ponzer S; Tidermark J
    J Clin Nurs; 2006 Mar; 15(3):308-14. PubMed ID: 16466480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Turkish Nurses' Opinions of the Braden and Waterlow Pressure Ulcer Risk Assessment Scales: A Descriptive Pilot Study.
    Avsar P; Karadag A
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2016 Feb; 62(2):34-40. PubMed ID: 26901388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.