310 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16465430)
1. Magnetic resonance angiography without contrast enhancement medium in bone and soft tissue tumors.
Doi H; Ono A; Kawai A; Morimoto Y; Kunisada T; Nakata E; Ozaki T
Oncol Rep; 2006 Mar; 15(3):681-5. PubMed ID: 16465430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Preliminary study of 3T 1H MR spectroscopy in bone and soft tissue tumors.
Qi ZH; Li CF; Li ZF; Zhang K; Wang Q; Yu DX
Chin Med J (Engl); 2009 Jan; 122(1):39-43. PubMed ID: 19187615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Preliminary study of proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy in bone and soft tissue tumors: an unassigned signal at 2.0-2.1 ppm may be a possible indicator of malignant neuroectodermal tumor.
Oya N; Aoki J; Shinozaki T; Watanabe H; Takagishi K; Endo K
Radiat Med; 2000; 18(3):193-8. PubMed ID: 10972550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The role of MRS in the differentiation of benign and malignant soft tissue and bone tumors.
Doganay S; Altinok T; Alkan A; Kahraman B; Karakas HM
Eur J Radiol; 2011 Aug; 79(2):e33-7. PubMed ID: 21376496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [A comparative study between magnetic resonance imaging and histological findings of bone and soft tissue tumors].
Itoh K
Nihon Seikeigeka Gakkai Zasshi; 1995 Oct; 69(10):899-914. PubMed ID: 8551093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Characterization of bone and soft-tissue tumors with in vivo 1H MR spectroscopy: initial results.
Wang CK; Li CW; Hsieh TJ; Chien SH; Liu GC; Tsai KB
Radiology; 2004 Aug; 232(2):599-605. PubMed ID: 15286325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Pre-operative radiotherapy in soft tissue tumors. Assessment of response by static post-contrast MR imaging compared to histopathology.
Einarsdottir H; Wejde J; Bauer HC
Acta Radiol; 2001 Jan; 42(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 11167322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Ability of diffusion-weighted imaging for the differential diagnosis between chronic expanding hematomas and malignant soft tissue tumors.
Oka K; Yakushiji T; Sato H; Yorimitsu S; Hayashida Y; Yamashita Y; Mizuta H
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Nov; 28(5):1195-200. PubMed ID: 18972359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Musculoskeletal neoplasms: preoperative evaluation with MR angiography.
Swan JS; Grist TM; Sproat IA; Heiner JP; Wiersma SR; Heisey DM
Radiology; 1995 Feb; 194(2):519-24. PubMed ID: 7529935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [MR imaging of bone and soft tissue tumors].
Nishimura H; Koganemaru M; Uchida M; Ohtake H; Nakashima M
Rinsho Hoshasen; 1990 Jan; 35(1):57-68. PubMed ID: 2313923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. MR imaging of musculoskeletal tumors in the elbow region.
Steinbach LS; Anderson S; Panicek D
Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 1997 Aug; 5(3):619-53. PubMed ID: 9219722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Contrast-enhanced whole-heart coronary magnetic resonance angiography at 3.0 T: comparison with steady-state free precession technique at 1.5 T.
Liu X; Bi X; Huang J; Jerecic R; Carr J; Li D
Invest Radiol; 2008 Sep; 43(9):663-8. PubMed ID: 18708861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Longitudinally monitoring chemotherapy effect of malignant musculoskeletal tumors with in vivo proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy: an initial experience.
Hsieh TJ; Li CW; Chuang HY; Liu GC; Wang CK
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2008; 32(6):987-94. PubMed ID: 19204465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. MR imaging of tumors and tumor-like lesions of the hip.
Bancroft LW; Peterson JJ; Kransdorf MJ
Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 2005 Nov; 13(4):757-74. PubMed ID: 16275582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. 3 T contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography for evaluation of the intracranial arteries: comparison with time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography and multislice computed tomography angiography.
Villablanca JP; Nael K; Habibi R; Nael A; Laub G; Finn JP
Invest Radiol; 2006 Nov; 41(11):799-805. PubMed ID: 17035870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Diagnostic pitfalls in postinterventional intraarterial magnetic resonance angiography after recanalization of femoropopliteal arterial occlusions.
Huegli RW; Aschwanden M; Kos S; Rasmus M; Jaeger K; Jacob AL; Bilecen D
Acta Radiol; 2008 Dec; 49(10):1129-36. PubMed ID: 19031180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Feasibility of peripheral contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography at 3.0 Tesla with a hybrid technique: comparison with digital subtraction angiography.
Berg F; Bangard C; Bovenschulte H; Hellmich M; Nijenhuis M; Lackner K; Gossmann A
Invest Radiol; 2008 Sep; 43(9):642-9. PubMed ID: 18708858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Benign and malignant masses. MR imaging differentiation.
Weatherall PT
Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 1995 Nov; 3(4):669-94. PubMed ID: 8564689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The use of magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of bone and soft-tissue tumors.
Dalinka MK; Zlatkin MB; Chao P; Kricun ME; Kressel HY
Radiol Clin North Am; 1990 Mar; 28(2):461-70. PubMed ID: 2408105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Foreign-body granulomas in the trunk and extremities may simulate malignant soft-tissue tumors: report of three cases.
Nakamura T; Kusuzaki K; Matsubara T; Matsumine A; Uchida A
Acta Radiol; 2008 Feb; 49(1):80-3. PubMed ID: 18210316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
