These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16466553)

  • 1. Can the results of anorectal (abdominoperineal) resection be improved: are circumferential resection margins too often positive?
    Radcliffe A
    Colorectal Dis; 2006 Mar; 8(3):160-7. PubMed ID: 16466553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Oncological outcomes after total mesorectal excision for cure for cancer of the lower rectum: anterior vs. abdominoperineal resection.
    Wibe A; Syse A; Andersen E; Tretli S; Myrvold HE; Søreide O;
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2004 Jan; 47(1):48-58. PubMed ID: 14719151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Risk factors for adverse outcome in patients with rectal cancer treated with an abdominoperineal resection in the total mesorectal excision trial.
    den Dulk M; Marijnen CA; Putter H; Rutten HJ; Beets GL; Wiggers T; Nagtegaal ID; van de Velde CJ
    Ann Surg; 2007 Jul; 246(1):83-90. PubMed ID: 17592295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Management and imaging of low rectal carcinoma.
    Salerno G; Daniels I; Heald RJ; Brown G; Moran BJ
    Surg Oncol; 2004; 13(2-3):55-61. PubMed ID: 15572087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Abdominoperineal excision with partial anterior en bloc resection in multimodal management of low rectal cancer: a strategy to reduce local recurrence.
    Smedh K; Khani MH; Kraaz W; Raab Y; Strand E
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2006 Jun; 49(6):833-40. PubMed ID: 16619115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Factors affecting circumferential resection margin involvement after rectal cancer excision.
    Tilney HS; Tekkis PP; Sains PS; Constantinides VA; Heriot AG;
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2007 Jan; 50(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 17115338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Local recurrence after abdomino-perineal resection.
    Davies M; Harris D; Hirst G; Beynon R; Morgan AR; Carr ND; Beynon J
    Colorectal Dis; 2009 Jan; 11(1):39-43. PubMed ID: 19076836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Extended abdominoperineal resection with gluteus maximus flap reconstruction of the pelvic floor for rectal cancer.
    Holm T; Ljung A; Häggmark T; Jurell G; Lagergren J
    Br J Surg; 2007 Feb; 94(2):232-8. PubMed ID: 17143848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Magnetic resonance imaging of the low rectum: defining the radiological anatomy.
    Salerno G; Daniels IR; Brown G
    Colorectal Dis; 2006 Sep; 8 Suppl 3():10-3. PubMed ID: 16813585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Factors that influence the adequacy of total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.
    Jeyarajah S; Sutton CD; Miller AS; Hemingway D;
    Colorectal Dis; 2007 Nov; 9(9):808-15. PubMed ID: 17441969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The clinical significance of the circumferential resection margin following preoperative pelvic chemo-radiotherapy in rectal cancer: why we need a common language.
    Glynne-Jones R; Mawdsley S; Novell JR
    Colorectal Dis; 2006 Nov; 8(9):800-7. PubMed ID: 17032329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Laparoscopic-assisted versus open abdominoperineal resection for low rectal cancer: a prospective randomized trial.
    Ng SS; Leung KL; Lee JF; Yiu RY; Li JC; Teoh AY; Leung WW
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2008 Sep; 15(9):2418-25. PubMed ID: 18392659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Preservation of the continence function after intersphincteric resection using a prolapsing technique in the patients with low rectal cancer and its clinical prognosis.
    Dai Y; Jiang JB; Bi DS; Jin ZT; Sun JZ; Hu SY
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2008 Oct; 121(20):2016-20. PubMed ID: 19080267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Extralevator abdominoperineal resection in the prone position.
    Flor-Lorente B; Frasson M; Montilla E
    Cir Esp; 2014 Mar; 92 Suppl 1():30-9. PubMed ID: 24842689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Focus on extralevator perineal dissection in supine position for low rectal cancer has led to better quality of surgery and oncologic outcome.
    Martijnse IS; Dudink RL; West NP; Wasowicz D; Nieuwenhuijzen GA; van Lijnschoten I; Martijn H; Lemmens VE; van de Velde CJ; Nagtegaal ID; Quirke P; Rutten HJ
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 Mar; 19(3):786-93. PubMed ID: 21861224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Research progression of extralevator abdominoperineal excision].
    Xu HR; Xu ZF; Li ZJ
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Jul; 16(7):698-700. PubMed ID: 23888456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of the impact of implementing the prone jackknife position for the perineal phase of abdominoperineal excision of the rectum.
    Tayyab M; Sharma A; Ragg JL; Macdonald AW; Gunn J; Hartley JE; Monson JR
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2012 Mar; 55(3):316-21. PubMed ID: 22469799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Perineal repair after extralevator abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer.
    Christensen HK; Nerstrøm P; Tei T; Laurberg S
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2011 Jun; 54(6):711-7. PubMed ID: 21552056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Rectal cancer--review of methods and treatment results].
    Grotowski M
    Pol Merkur Lekarski; 2004 Mar; 16(93):289-92. PubMed ID: 15190612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Local recurrence after 'standard' abdominoperineal resection: do we really need ELAPE?
    Xanthis A; Greenberg D; Jha B; Olafimihan O; Miller R; Fearnhead N; Davies J; Hall N
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2018 Feb; 100(2):111-115. PubMed ID: 29022795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.