BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16466553)

  • 1. Can the results of anorectal (abdominoperineal) resection be improved: are circumferential resection margins too often positive?
    Radcliffe A
    Colorectal Dis; 2006 Mar; 8(3):160-7. PubMed ID: 16466553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Oncological outcomes after total mesorectal excision for cure for cancer of the lower rectum: anterior vs. abdominoperineal resection.
    Wibe A; Syse A; Andersen E; Tretli S; Myrvold HE; Søreide O;
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2004 Jan; 47(1):48-58. PubMed ID: 14719151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Risk factors for adverse outcome in patients with rectal cancer treated with an abdominoperineal resection in the total mesorectal excision trial.
    den Dulk M; Marijnen CA; Putter H; Rutten HJ; Beets GL; Wiggers T; Nagtegaal ID; van de Velde CJ
    Ann Surg; 2007 Jul; 246(1):83-90. PubMed ID: 17592295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Management and imaging of low rectal carcinoma.
    Salerno G; Daniels I; Heald RJ; Brown G; Moran BJ
    Surg Oncol; 2004; 13(2-3):55-61. PubMed ID: 15572087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Abdominoperineal excision with partial anterior en bloc resection in multimodal management of low rectal cancer: a strategy to reduce local recurrence.
    Smedh K; Khani MH; Kraaz W; Raab Y; Strand E
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2006 Jun; 49(6):833-40. PubMed ID: 16619115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Factors affecting circumferential resection margin involvement after rectal cancer excision.
    Tilney HS; Tekkis PP; Sains PS; Constantinides VA; Heriot AG;
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2007 Jan; 50(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 17115338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Local recurrence after abdomino-perineal resection.
    Davies M; Harris D; Hirst G; Beynon R; Morgan AR; Carr ND; Beynon J
    Colorectal Dis; 2009 Jan; 11(1):39-43. PubMed ID: 19076836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Extended abdominoperineal resection with gluteus maximus flap reconstruction of the pelvic floor for rectal cancer.
    Holm T; Ljung A; Häggmark T; Jurell G; Lagergren J
    Br J Surg; 2007 Feb; 94(2):232-8. PubMed ID: 17143848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Magnetic resonance imaging of the low rectum: defining the radiological anatomy.
    Salerno G; Daniels IR; Brown G
    Colorectal Dis; 2006 Sep; 8 Suppl 3():10-3. PubMed ID: 16813585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Factors that influence the adequacy of total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.
    Jeyarajah S; Sutton CD; Miller AS; Hemingway D;
    Colorectal Dis; 2007 Nov; 9(9):808-15. PubMed ID: 17441969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The clinical significance of the circumferential resection margin following preoperative pelvic chemo-radiotherapy in rectal cancer: why we need a common language.
    Glynne-Jones R; Mawdsley S; Novell JR
    Colorectal Dis; 2006 Nov; 8(9):800-7. PubMed ID: 17032329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Laparoscopic-assisted versus open abdominoperineal resection for low rectal cancer: a prospective randomized trial.
    Ng SS; Leung KL; Lee JF; Yiu RY; Li JC; Teoh AY; Leung WW
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2008 Sep; 15(9):2418-25. PubMed ID: 18392659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Preservation of the continence function after intersphincteric resection using a prolapsing technique in the patients with low rectal cancer and its clinical prognosis.
    Dai Y; Jiang JB; Bi DS; Jin ZT; Sun JZ; Hu SY
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2008 Oct; 121(20):2016-20. PubMed ID: 19080267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Extralevator abdominoperineal resection in the prone position.
    Flor-Lorente B; Frasson M; Montilla E
    Cir Esp; 2014 Mar; 92 Suppl 1():30-9. PubMed ID: 24842689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Focus on extralevator perineal dissection in supine position for low rectal cancer has led to better quality of surgery and oncologic outcome.
    Martijnse IS; Dudink RL; West NP; Wasowicz D; Nieuwenhuijzen GA; van Lijnschoten I; Martijn H; Lemmens VE; van de Velde CJ; Nagtegaal ID; Quirke P; Rutten HJ
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 Mar; 19(3):786-93. PubMed ID: 21861224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Research progression of extralevator abdominoperineal excision].
    Xu HR; Xu ZF; Li ZJ
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Jul; 16(7):698-700. PubMed ID: 23888456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of the impact of implementing the prone jackknife position for the perineal phase of abdominoperineal excision of the rectum.
    Tayyab M; Sharma A; Ragg JL; Macdonald AW; Gunn J; Hartley JE; Monson JR
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2012 Mar; 55(3):316-21. PubMed ID: 22469799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Perineal repair after extralevator abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer.
    Christensen HK; Nerstrøm P; Tei T; Laurberg S
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2011 Jun; 54(6):711-7. PubMed ID: 21552056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Rectal cancer--review of methods and treatment results].
    Grotowski M
    Pol Merkur Lekarski; 2004 Mar; 16(93):289-92. PubMed ID: 15190612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Local recurrence after 'standard' abdominoperineal resection: do we really need ELAPE?
    Xanthis A; Greenberg D; Jha B; Olafimihan O; Miller R; Fearnhead N; Davies J; Hall N
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2018 Feb; 100(2):111-115. PubMed ID: 29022795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.