333 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16466714)
1. Comparison of invasive and non-invasive tonometry in the mouse.
Morris CA; Crowston JG; Lindsey JD; Danias J; Weinreb RN
Exp Eye Res; 2006 Jun; 82(6):1094-9. PubMed ID: 16466714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Predictability and limitations of non-invasive murine tonometry: comparison of two devices.
Filippopoulos T; Matsubara A; Danias J; Huang W; Dobberfuhl A; Ren L; Mittag T; Miller JW; Grosskreutz CL
Exp Eye Res; 2006 Jul; 83(1):194-201. PubMed ID: 16564045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Non-invasive determination of intraocular pressure in the rat eye. Comparison of an electronic tonometer (TonoPen), and a rebound (impact probe) tonometer.
Goldblum D; Kontiola AI; Mittag T; Chen B; Danias J
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2002 Nov; 240(11):942-6. PubMed ID: 12486518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Intraocular pressure measurement in mice: a comparison between Goldmann and rebound tonometry.
Kim CY; Kuehn MH; Anderson MG; Kwon YH
Eye (Lond); 2007 Sep; 21(9):1202-9. PubMed ID: 16946746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The efficacy of TonoLab in detecting physiological and pharmacological changes of mouse intraocular pressure--comparison with TonoPen and microneedle manometery.
Saeki T; Aihara M; Ohashi M; Araie M
Curr Eye Res; 2008 Mar; 33(3):247-52. PubMed ID: 18350435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The induction/impact tonometer: a new instrument to measure intraocular pressure in the rat.
Kontiola AI; Goldblum D; Mittag T; Danias J
Exp Eye Res; 2001 Dec; 73(6):781-5. PubMed ID: 11846509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of the rebound tonometer (ICare) to the applanation tonometer (Tonopen XL) in normotensive dogs.
Leiva M; Naranjo C; Peña MT
Vet Ophthalmol; 2006; 9(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 16409240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of the ICare rebound tonometer with the Goldmann tonometer in a normal population.
Fernandes P; Díaz-Rey JA; Queirós A; Gonzalez-Meijome JM; Jorge J
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2005 Sep; 25(5):436-40. PubMed ID: 16101950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of a rebound tonometer (Tonovet) in clinically normal cat eyes.
Rusanen E; Florin M; Hässig M; Spiess BM
Vet Ophthalmol; 2010 Jan; 13(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 20149173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Noninvasive measurement of rodent intraocular pressure with a rebound tonometer.
Wang WH; Millar JC; Pang IH; Wax MB; Clark AF
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Dec; 46(12):4617-21. PubMed ID: 16303957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of laser in situ keratomileusis on rebound tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry.
Lam AK; Wu R; Wang Z; Woo V; Chan E; Tam K; Chau R; Wong KK
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2010 Apr; 36(4):631-6. PubMed ID: 20362856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of the rebound tonometer (TonoVet) with the applanation tonometer (TonoPen XL) in normal Eurasian Eagle owls (Bubo bubo).
Jeong MB; Kim YJ; Yi NY; Park SA; Kim WT; Kim SE; Chae JM; Kim JT; Lee H; Seo KM
Vet Ophthalmol; 2007; 10(6):376-9. PubMed ID: 17970999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical evaluation of rebound tonometer.
Davies LN; Bartlett H; Mallen EA; Wolffsohn JS
Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2006 Apr; 84(2):206-9. PubMed ID: 16637838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Rebound tonometry in conscious, conditioned mice avoids the acute and profound effects of anesthesia on intraocular pressure.
Johnson TV; Fan S; Toris CB
J Ocul Pharmacol Ther; 2008 Apr; 24(2):175-85. PubMed ID: 18355131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy of the new ICare rebound tonometer vs. other portable tonometers in healthy eyes.
García-Resúa C; González-Meijome JM; Gilino J; Yebra-Pimentel E
Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Feb; 83(2):102-7. PubMed ID: 16501412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Technical note: a comparison of central and peripheral intraocular pressure using rebound tonometry.
Queirós A; González-Méijome JM; Fernandes P; Jorge J; Montés-Micó R; Almeida JB; Parafita MA
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2007 Sep; 27(5):506-11. PubMed ID: 17718891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The accuracy of continued clinical use of goldmann applanation tonometers with known calibration errors.
Sandhu SS; Chattopadhyay S; Amariotakis GA; Skarmoutsos F; Birch MK; Ray-Chaudhuri N
Ophthalmology; 2009 Jan; 116(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 18801579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reduction of intraocular pressure in mouse eyes treated with latanoprost.
Aihara M; Lindsey JD; Weinreb RN
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2002 Jan; 43(1):146-50. PubMed ID: 11773025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of topical hypotensive drugs on circadian IOP, blood pressure, and calculated diastolic ocular perfusion pressure in patients with glaucoma.
Quaranta L; Gandolfo F; Turano R; Rovida F; Pizzolante T; Musig A; Gandolfo E
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Jul; 47(7):2917-23. PubMed ID: 16799034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of intraocular pressure in conscious ferrets (Mustela putorius furo) by means of rebound tonometry and comparison with applanation tonometry.
Di Girolamo N; Andreani V; Guandalini A; Selleri P
Vet Rec; 2013 Apr; 172(15):396. PubMed ID: 23486504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
