These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16467060)

  • 1. Cemented versus uncemented hip replacement.
    Tidermark J
    Disabil Rehabil; 2006 Feb; 28(4):243. PubMed ID: 16467060
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cemented versus uncemented hip replacement for fracture of the hip.
    Hay M; Gottschalk F
    Disabil Rehabil; 2005 Sep 30-Oct 15; 27(18-19):1151-5. PubMed ID: 16278184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Choice of hip prosthesis in patients younger than 50 years].
    Schreurs BW; Busch VJ; Veth RP
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2007 Sep; 151(35):1918-22. PubMed ID: 17907541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Tapered stems in cemented primary total hip replacement.
    Dunlop DJ; Masri BA; Greidanus NV; Garbuz DS; Duncan CP
    Instr Course Lect; 2002; 51():81-91. PubMed ID: 12064151
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fracture load for periprosthetic femoral fractures in cemented versus uncemented hip stems: an experimental in vitro study.
    Thomsen MN; Jakubowitz E; Seeger JB; Lee C; Kretzer JP; Clarius M
    Orthopedics; 2008 Jul; 31(7):653. PubMed ID: 19292385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Uncemented total hip arthroplasty in younger patients].
    Jacobsen S; Jensen FK; Poulsen KA; Stürup J; Retpen JB
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2004 Nov; 166(48):4369-72. PubMed ID: 15587630
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The uncemented isoelastic/isotitan total hip arthroplasty. A 10-15 years follow-up with bone mineral density evaluation.
    Nagi ON; Kumar S; Aggarwal S
    Acta Orthop Belg; 2006 Jan; 72(1):55-64. PubMed ID: 16570896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Uncemented femoral revision arthroplasty using the modular revision prosthesis MRP-TITAN revision stem.
    Mumme T; Müller-Rath R; Andereya S; Wirtz DC
    Oper Orthop Traumatol; 2007 Mar; 19(1):56-77. PubMed ID: 17345027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Total hip arthroplasty in the treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip].
    Tözün IR; Beksaç B; Sener N
    Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc; 2007; 41 Suppl 1():80-6. PubMed ID: 17483628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Does cement increase the risk of infection in primary total hip arthroplasty? Revision rates in 56,275 cemented and uncemented primary THAs followed for 0-16 years in the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register.
    Engesaeter LB; Espehaug B; Lie SA; Furnes O; Havelin LI
    Acta Orthop; 2006 Jun; 77(3):351-8. PubMed ID: 16819671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Long term results of the Corin C-Fit uncemented total hip arthroplasty in young patients.
    Raj D; Jaiswal PK; Sharma BL; Fergusson CM
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2008 Dec; 128(12):1391-5. PubMed ID: 18176810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Long-term outcome and risk factors of proximal femoral fracture in uncemented and cemented total hip arthroplasty in 2551 hips.
    Berend ME; Smith A; Meding JB; Ritter MA; Lynch T; Davis K
    J Arthroplasty; 2006 Sep; 21(6 Suppl 2):53-9. PubMed ID: 16950062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Total hip arthroplasty outcomes assessment using functional and radiographic scores to compare canine systems.
    Iwata D; Broun HC; Black AP; Preston CA; Anderson GI
    Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol; 2008; 21(3):221-30. PubMed ID: 18536848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The influence of surgical approach on cemented stem stability: an RSA study.
    Purushothaman B; Lakshmanan P
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2007 Nov; 464():262; author reply 262. PubMed ID: 17975380
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cemented femoral fixation: the North Atlantic divide.
    Dunbar MJ
    Orthopedics; 2009 Sep; 32(9):. PubMed ID: 19751019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of the outcome of cemented all-polyethylene and cementless metal-backed acetabular sockets in primary total hip arthroplasty.
    Hartofilakidis G; Georgiades G; Babis GC
    J Arthroplasty; 2009 Feb; 24(2):217-25. PubMed ID: 18534419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Re: uncemented Austin-Moore and cemented Thompson unipolar hemiarthroplasty for displaced fracture neck of femur: comparison of complications and patient satisfaction.
    Melamed E; Garti A; Robinson D
    Injury; 2007 Feb; 38(2):256. PubMed ID: 17045995
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [History of hip arthroplasty].
    Płomiński J; Kwiatkowski K
    Pol Merkur Lekarski; 2007 Feb; 22(128):83-5. PubMed ID: 17598648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An animal model for interface tissue formation in cemented hip replacements.
    El-Warrak AO; Olmstead M; Apelt D; Deiss F; Noetzli H; Zlinsky K; Hilbe M; Bertschar-Wolfsberger R; Johnson AL; Auer J; von Rechenberg B
    Vet Surg; 2004; 33(5):495-504. PubMed ID: 15362988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Results of 10-14 years of titanium shank prosthesis cementation].
    Berli B; Schäfer D; Dick W
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2003; 141(5):491-3. PubMed ID: 14628798
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.