These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16467435)

  • 61. A headset-mounted mini sampler for measuring exposure to welding aerosol in the breathing zone.
    Lidén G; Surakka J
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2009 Mar; 53(2):99-116. PubMed ID: 19196747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Exposure to manufactured nanoparticles in different workplaces.
    Brouwer D
    Toxicology; 2010 Mar; 269(2-3):120-7. PubMed ID: 19941928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Mixed-effects models for the evaluation of long-term trends in exposure levels with an example from the nickel industry.
    Symanski E; Chan W; Chang CC
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2001 Jan; 45(1):71-81. PubMed ID: 11137701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Studying the determinants of exposure: a review of methods.
    Burstyn I; Teschke K
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1999; 60(1):57-72. PubMed ID: 10028617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. [Occupational exposure to mycotoxins in various branches of industry].
    Soroka PM; Cyprowski M; Szadkowska-Stańczyk I
    Med Pr; 2008; 59(4):333-45. PubMed ID: 19143225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Exposure to manufactured nanostructured particles in an industrial pilot plant.
    Demou E; Peter P; Hellweg S
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2008 Nov; 52(8):695-706. PubMed ID: 18931382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Usage of air monitoring and biomarkers of isocyanate exposure to assess the effect of a control intervention.
    Tinnerberg H; Mattsson C
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2008 Apr; 52(3):187-94. PubMed ID: 18344533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. [Backgrounds for assessing occupational exposure to crystalline silica dust in Poland and worldwide].
    Maciejewska A
    Med Pr; 2007; 58(4):327-44. PubMed ID: 18041202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Molecular epidemiological studies in 1,3-butadiene exposed Czech workers: female-male comparisons.
    Albertini RJ; Sram RJ; Vacek PM; Lynch J; Rossner P; Nicklas JA; McDonald JD; Boysen G; Georgieva N; Swenberg JA
    Chem Biol Interact; 2007 Mar; 166(1-3):63-77. PubMed ID: 16949064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Exposure to inhalable dust and its cyclohexane soluble fraction since the 1970s in the rubber manufacturing industry in the European Union.
    de Vocht F; Vermeulen R; Burstyn I; Sobala W; Dost A; Taeger D; Bergendorf U; Straif K; Swuste P; Kromhout H;
    Occup Environ Med; 2008 Jun; 65(6):384-91. PubMed ID: 17928385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Simultaneous assessment of occupational exposures from multiple worker groups.
    Weaver MA; Kupper LL; Taylor D; Kromhout H; Susi P; Rappaport SM
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2001 Oct; 45(7):525-42. PubMed ID: 11583655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. A cross-sectional study of lung function and respiratory symptoms among chemical workers producing diacetyl for food flavourings.
    van Rooy FG; Smit LA; Houba R; Zaat VA; Rooyackers JM; Heederik DJ
    Occup Environ Med; 2009 Feb; 66(2):105-10. PubMed ID: 18805877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Variation of exposure between workers in homogeneous exposure groups.
    Rappaport SM; Kromhout H; Symanski E
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1993 Nov; 54(11):654-62. PubMed ID: 8256689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Use of short-term measurements for assessing temporal variability of residential ELF magnetic field exposure.
    Eskelinen T; Niiranen J; Juutilainen J
    J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol; 2003 Sep; 13(5):372-7. PubMed ID: 12973365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Metamodels of bias in Cox proportional-hazards and logistic regressions with heteroscedastic measurement error under group-level exposure assessment.
    Burstyn I; Kim HM; Cherry N; Yasui Y
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2006 Apr; 50(3):271-9. PubMed ID: 16371413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Comparison of self-assessment and expert assessment of occupational exposure to chemicals.
    Liljelind IE; Rappaport SM; Levin JO; Strömback AE; Sunesson AL; Järvholm BG
    Scand J Work Environ Health; 2001 Oct; 27(5):311-7. PubMed ID: 11712611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. The effect of temperature differences on the distribution of an airborne contaminant in an experimental room.
    Lee E; Feigley CE; Khan JA; Hussey JR
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2006 Jul; 50(5):527-37. PubMed ID: 16611801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Exposure to chrysotile asbestos associated with unpacking and repacking boxes of automobile brake pads and shoes.
    Madl AK; Scott LL; Murbach DM; Fehling KA; Finley BL; Paustenbach DJ
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2008 Aug; 52(6):463-79. PubMed ID: 18515846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. The effect of autocorrelation on the estimation of workers' daily exposures.
    Francis M; Selvin S; Spear R; Rappaport S
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1989 Jan; 50(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 2929425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Survey assessment of worker dermal exposure and underlying behavioral determinants.
    Geer LA; Anna D; Curbow B; Diener-West M; de Joode Bv; Mitchell C; Buckley TJ
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2007 Nov; 4(11):809-20. PubMed ID: 17846926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.