These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
257 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16468448)
1. Super-resolution in PET imaging. Kennedy JA; Israel O; Frenkel A; Bar-Shalom R; Azhari H IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2006 Feb; 25(2):137-47. PubMed ID: 16468448 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Feasibility of [18F]FDG-PET and coregistered CT on clinical target volume definition of advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Messa C; Ceresoli GL; Rizzo G; Artioli D; Cattaneo M; Castellone P; Gregorc V; Picchio M; Landoni C; Fazio F Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2005 Sep; 49(3):259-66. PubMed ID: 16172572 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Improvement in clinical evaluation of PET/CT images with high resolution algorithms. Orlandini LC; Betti M; Fulcheri C; Dona M; Fisicaro D; Castagnoli A Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2013 Jun; 57(2):201-6. PubMed ID: 23486348 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical evaluation of PET image reconstruction using a spatial resolution model. Andersen FL; Klausen TL; Loft A; Beyer T; Holm S Eur J Radiol; 2013 May; 82(5):862-9. PubMed ID: 23254158 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Correction of photon attenuation and collimator response for a body-contouring SPECT/CT imaging system. Seo Y; Wong KH; Sun M; Franc BL; Hawkins RA; Hasegawa BH J Nucl Med; 2005 May; 46(5):868-77. PubMed ID: 15872362 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Optimisation of the OS-EM algorithm and comparison with FBP for image reconstruction on a dual-head camera: a phantom and a clinical 18F-FDG study. Gutman F; Gardin I; Delahaye N; Rakotonirina H; Hitzel A; Manrique A; Le Guludec D; Véra P Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2003 Nov; 30(11):1510-9. PubMed ID: 14579091 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Image reconstructions from super-sampled data sets with resolution modeling in PET imaging. Li Y; Matej S; Metzler SD Med Phys; 2014 Dec; 41(12):121912. PubMed ID: 25471972 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Design of respiration averaged CT for attenuation correction of the PET data from PET/CT. Chi PC; Mawlawi O; Nehmeh SA; Erdi YE; Balter PA; Luo D; Mohan R; Pan T Med Phys; 2007 Jun; 34(6):2039-47. PubMed ID: 17654907 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A hybrid algorithm for PET/CT image merger in hybrid scanners. Kennedy JA; Israel O; Frenkel A; Bar-Shalom R; Azhari H Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2007 Apr; 34(4):517-31. PubMed ID: 17115215 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A lesion detection observer study comparing 2-dimensional versus fully 3-dimensional whole-body PET imaging protocols. Lartizien C; Kinahan PE; Comtat C J Nucl Med; 2004 Apr; 45(4):714-23. PubMed ID: 15073270 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Usefulness of noise adaptive non-linear gaussian filter in FDG-PET study. Nagayoshi M; Murase K; Fujino K; Uenishi Y; Kawamata M; Nakamura Y; Kitamura K; Higuchi I; Oku N; Hatazawa J Ann Nucl Med; 2005 Sep; 19(6):469-77. PubMed ID: 16248383 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Investigation of time-of-flight benefit for fully 3-D PET. Surti S; Karp JS; Popescu LM; Daube-Witherspoon ME; Werner M IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2006 May; 25(5):529-38. PubMed ID: 16689258 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Three-dimensional maximum a posteriori (MAP) imaging with radiopharmaceuticals labeled with three Cu radionuclides. Ruangma A; Bai B; Lewis JS; Sun X; Welch MJ; Leahy R; Laforest R Nucl Med Biol; 2006 Feb; 33(2):217-26. PubMed ID: 16546676 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Two-dimensional vs three-dimensional imaging in whole body oncologic PET/CT: a Discovery-STE phantom and patient study. Bettinardi V; Mancosu P; Danna M; Giovacchini G; Landoni C; Picchio M; Gilardi MC; Savi A; Castiglioni I; Lecchi M; Fazio F Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2007 Sep; 51(3):214-23. PubMed ID: 17464266 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Segmentation of heterogeneous or small FDG PET positive tissue based on a 3D-locally adaptive random walk algorithm. Onoma DP; Ruan S; Thureau S; Nkhali L; Modzelewski R; Monnehan GA; Vera P; Gardin I Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2014 Dec; 38(8):753-63. PubMed ID: 25450759 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional acquisition for 18F-FDG PET oncology studies performed on an LSO-based scanner. Lodge MA; Badawi RD; Gilbert R; Dibos PE; Line BR J Nucl Med; 2006 Jan; 47(1):23-31. PubMed ID: 16391183 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of PET reconstruction parameters on the TrueX algorithm. A combined phantom and patient study. Knäusl B; Rausch IF; Bergmann H; Dudczak R; Hirtl A; Georg D Nuklearmedizin; 2013; 52(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 23348719 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Validation of fast-RAMLA in clinical PET. Sato H; Cho K; Fukushima Y; Shiiba M; Hakozaki K; Kiriyama T; Sakurai M; Kanaya K; Kumita S Ann Nucl Med; 2008 Dec; 22(10):869-76. PubMed ID: 19142705 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Automated 3-dimensional elastic registration of whole-body PET and CT from separate or combined scanners. Shekhar R; Walimbe V; Raja S; Zagrodsky V; Kanvinde M; Wu G; Bybel B J Nucl Med; 2005 Sep; 46(9):1488-96. PubMed ID: 16157532 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]