These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16468454)

  • 1. Observer efficiency in discrimination tasks simulating malignant and benign breast lesions imaged with ultrasound.
    Abbey CK; Zemp RJ; Liu J; Lindfors KK; Insana MF
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2006 Feb; 25(2):198-209. PubMed ID: 16468454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Efficiency of the human observer detecting random signals in random backgrounds.
    Park S; Clarkson E; Kupinski MA; Barrett HH
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2005 Jan; 22(1):3-16. PubMed ID: 15669610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An ideal observer approach to mechanical limits in b-mode ultrasound imaging.
    Abbey CK; Nguyen NQ; O'Brien WD; Insana MF
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2012; 2012():2306-9. PubMed ID: 23366385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Computer-aided diagnosis of solid breast nodules: use of an artificial neural network based on multiple sonographic features.
    Joo S; Yang YS; Moon WK; Kim HC
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2004 Oct; 23(10):1292-300. PubMed ID: 15493696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Classification of breast tumors using sonographic texture analysis.
    Ardakani AA; Gharbali A; Mohammadi A
    J Ultrasound Med; 2015 Feb; 34(2):225-31. PubMed ID: 25614395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Segmentation of solid nodules in ultrasonographic breast image based on wavelet transform.
    Park S; Kong HJ; Moon WK; Kim HC
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2007; 2007():5650-3. PubMed ID: 18003294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Learning a structured graphical model with boosted top-down features for ultrasound image segmentation.
    Hao Z; Wang Q; Wang X; Kim JB; Hwang Y; Cho BH; Guo P; Lee WK
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2013; 16(Pt 1):227-34. PubMed ID: 24505670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A new methodology based on q-entropy for breast lesion classification in 3-D ultrasound images.
    Rodrigues PS; Giraldi GA; Provenzano M; Faria MD; Chang RF; Suri JS
    Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2006; 2006():1048-51. PubMed ID: 17945617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Computer-aided detection/diagnosis of breast cancer in mammography and ultrasound: a review.
    Jalalian A; Mashohor SB; Mahmud HR; Saripan MI; Ramli AR; Karasfi B
    Clin Imaging; 2013; 37(3):420-6. PubMed ID: 23153689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Diagnostic performance of automated breast ultrasound as a replacement for a hand-held second-look ultrasound for breast lesions detected initially on magnetic resonance imaging.
    Chae EY; Shin HJ; Kim HJ; Yoo H; Baek S; Cha JH; Kim HH
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2013 Dec; 39(12):2246-54. PubMed ID: 24035627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Whole Breast Ultrasound: Comparison of the Visibility of Suspicious Lesions with Automated Breast Volumetric Scanning Versus Hand-Held Breast Ultrasound.
    Kuzmiak CM; Ko EY; Tuttle LA; Steed D; Zeng D; Yoon SC
    Acad Radiol; 2015 Jul; 22(7):870-9. PubMed ID: 25872862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Optimization of Region of Interest Drawing for Quantitative Analysis: Differentiation Between Benign and Malignant Breast Lesions on Contrast-Enhanced Sonography.
    Nakata N; Ohta T; Nishioka M; Takeyama H; Toriumi Y; Kato K; Nogi H; Kamio M; Fukuda K
    J Ultrasound Med; 2015 Nov; 34(11):1969-76. PubMed ID: 26384607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Computer-assisted assessment of ultrasound real-time elastography: initial experience in 145 breast lesions.
    Zhang X; Xiao Y; Zeng J; Qiu W; Qian M; Wang C; Zheng R; Zheng H
    Eur J Radiol; 2014 Jan; 83(1):e1-7. PubMed ID: 24148563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Objective assessment of image quality. IV. Application to adaptive optics.
    Barrett HH; Myers KJ; Devaney N; Dainty C
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2006 Dec; 23(12):3080-105. PubMed ID: 17106464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. CAD algorithms for solid breast masses discrimination: evaluation of the accuracy and interobserver variability.
    Wang Y; Jiang S; Wang H; Guo YH; Liu B; Hou Y; Cheng H; Tian J
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2010 Aug; 36(8):1273-81. PubMed ID: 20691917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Automatic mammary duct detection in 3D ultrasound.
    Gooding MJ; Mellor M; Shipley JA; Broadbent KA; Goddard DA
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2005; 8(Pt 1):434-41. PubMed ID: 16685875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bimodal Multiparameter-Based Approach for Benign-Malignant Classification of Breast Tumors.
    Ara SR; Alam F; Rahman MH; Akhter S; Awwal R; Hasan K
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2015 Jul; 41(7):2022-38. PubMed ID: 25913281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Analysis of observer performance in known-location tasks for tomographic image reconstruction.
    Yendiki A; Fessler JA
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2006 Jan; 25(1):28-41. PubMed ID: 16398412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of a novel segmentation algorithm on radiologists' diagnosis of breast masses using ultrasound imaging.
    Tian JW; Ning CP; Guo YH; Cheng HD; Tang XL
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2012 Jan; 38(1):119-27. PubMed ID: 22104530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessing the combined performance of texture and morphological parameters in distinguishing breast tumors in ultrasound images.
    Alvarenga AV; Infantosi AF; Pereira WC; Azevedo CM
    Med Phys; 2012 Dec; 39(12):7350-8. PubMed ID: 23231284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.