370 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16469009)
1. Functional outcomes and oncological efficacy of Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy with Veil of Aphrodite nerve-sparing: an analysis of 154 consecutive patients.
Kaul S; Savera A; Badani K; Fumo M; Bhandari A; Menon M
BJU Int; 2006 Mar; 97(3):467-72. PubMed ID: 16469009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Operative details and oncological and functional outcome of robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: 400 cases with a minimum of 12 months follow-up.
Murphy DG; Kerger M; Crowe H; Peters JS; Costello AJ
Eur Urol; 2009 Jun; 55(6):1358-66. PubMed ID: 19147274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy: contemporary technique and analysis of results.
Menon M; Shrivastava A; Kaul S; Badani KK; Fumo M; Bhandari M; Peabody JO
Eur Urol; 2007 Mar; 51(3):648-57; discussion 657-8. PubMed ID: 17097214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Introducing a new, simple scoring system to evaluate oncological and functional outcome after radical prostatectomy.
Salomon L; Anastasiadis A; Saint F; De La Taille A; Chopin D; Abbou CC
Scand J Urol Nephrol; 2003; 37(5):392-5. PubMed ID: 14594687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of nerve sparing technique on patient self-assessed outcomes after radical perineal prostatectomy.
Kübler HR; Tseng TY; Sun L; Vieweg J; Harris MJ; Dahm P
J Urol; 2007 Aug; 178(2):488-92; discussion 492. PubMed ID: 17561133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dissociation of sexual function and sexual bother following autologous sural nerve grafting during radical prostatectomy.
Kuwata Y; Muneuchi G; Igawa HH; Tsukuda F; Inui M; Kakehi Y
Int J Urol; 2007 Jun; 14(6):510-4. PubMed ID: 17593095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Open radical retropubic prostatectomy gives favourable surgical and functional outcomes after transurethral resection of the prostate.
Palisaar JR; Wenske S; Sommerer F; Hinkel A; Noldus J
BJU Int; 2009 Sep; 104(5):611-5. PubMed ID: 19298408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cancer control and the preservation of neurovascular tissue: how to meet competing goals during robotic radical prostatectomy.
Tewari A; Rao S; Martinez-Salamanca JI; Leung R; Ramanathan R; Mandhani A; Vaughan ED; Menon M; Horninger W; Tu J; Bartsch G
BJU Int; 2008 Apr; 101(8):1013-8. PubMed ID: 18261153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Age stratified functional outcomes after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
Rogers CG; Su LM; Link RE; Sullivan W; Wagner A; Pavlovich CP
J Urol; 2006 Dec; 176(6 Pt 1):2448-52. PubMed ID: 17085126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Salvage robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: initial results and early report of outcomes.
Boris RS; Bhandari A; Krane LS; Eun D; Kaul S; Peabody JO
BJU Int; 2009 Apr; 103(7):952-6. PubMed ID: 19076132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Descending nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy--results and consequences.
Kälble T; Schmitt C; Bartschat T; Alt B; Yiakoumos T
Aktuelle Urol; 2010 Jan; 41 Suppl 1():S66-9. PubMed ID: 20094959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Oncological and functional results of antegrade radical retropubic prostatectomy for the treatment of clinically localised prostate cancer.
Carini M; Masieri L; Minervini A; Lapini A; Serni S
Eur Urol; 2008 Mar; 53(3):554-61. PubMed ID: 17683854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Does a nerve-sparing technique or potency affect continence after open radical retropubic prostatectomy?
Marien TP; Lepor H
BJU Int; 2008 Dec; 102(11):1581-4. PubMed ID: 18808410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Single institution 2-year patient reported validated sexual function outcomes after nerve sparing robot assisted radical prostatectomy.
Rodriguez E; Finley DS; Skarecky D; Ahlering TE
J Urol; 2009 Jan; 181(1):259-63. PubMed ID: 19013596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Robotic radical prostatectomy for elderly patients: probability of achieving continence and potency 1 year after surgery.
Shikanov S; Desai V; Razmaria A; Zagaja GP; Shalhav AL
J Urol; 2010 May; 183(5):1803-7. PubMed ID: 20299041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Potency following robotic radical prostatectomy: a questionnaire based analysis of outcomes after conventional nerve sparing and prostatic fascia sparing techniques.
Menon M; Kaul S; Bhandari A; Shrivastava A; Tewari A; Hemal A
J Urol; 2005 Dec; 174(6):2291-6, discussion 2296. PubMed ID: 16280816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Trifecta outcomes after robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy.
Shikanov SA; Zorn KC; Zagaja GP; Shalhav AL
Urology; 2009 Sep; 74(3):619-23. PubMed ID: 19592075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The anatomic radical perineal prostatectomy: an outcomes-based evolution.
Harris MJ
Eur Urol; 2007 Jul; 52(1):81-8. PubMed ID: 17084506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Seminal vesicle-sparing perineal radical prostatectomy improves early functional results in patients with low-risk prostate cancer.
Albers P; Schäfers S; Löhmer H; de Geeter P
BJU Int; 2007 Nov; 100(5):1050-4. PubMed ID: 17760889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Anatomical grades of nerve sparing: a risk-stratified approach to neural-hammock sparing during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP).
Tewari AK; Srivastava A; Huang MW; Robinson BD; Shevchuk MM; Durand M; Sooriakumaran P; Grover S; Yadav R; Mishra N; Mohan S; Brooks DC; Shaikh N; Khanna A; Leung R
BJU Int; 2011 Sep; 108(6 Pt 2):984-92. PubMed ID: 21917101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
