These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

295 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16469900)

  • 21. The NIH entitlement program.
    DeVita VT
    Nat Rev Clin Oncol; 2009 Nov; 6(11):613. PubMed ID: 19861989
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. National Institutes of Health. Two strikes and you're out, grant applicants learn.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 2008 Oct; 322(5900):358. PubMed ID: 18927363
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Commentary: new guidelines for NIH peer review: improving the system or undermining it?
    Spiegel AM
    Acad Med; 2010 May; 85(5):746-8. PubMed ID: 20520019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Don't create a climate of fear.
    Nature; 2003 Oct; 425(6961):885. PubMed ID: 14586426
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. NIH rating system.
    Gibson AR
    Science; 1996 Aug; 273(5275):562. PubMed ID: 8701302
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. NIH consultant finds little evidence of bias against clinical researchers.
    Brainard J
    Chron High Educ; 2005 Mar; 51(28):A23. PubMed ID: 15835080
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. NIH revises rules of conflict of interest of grant peer reviewers.
    Shalev M
    Lab Anim (NY); 2004 Mar; 33(3):15-6. PubMed ID: 15235618
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Two facets of peer review and the proper role of study sections.
    Lenard J
    Account Res; 2006; 13(3):277-83. PubMed ID: 17124762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Research funding. Politics and funding in the U.S. public biomedical R&D system.
    Hegde D; Mowery DC
    Science; 2008 Dec; 322(5909):1797-8. PubMed ID: 19095928
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Financial anatomy of neuroscience research.
    Fields H
    Ann Neurol; 2008 Jan; 63(1):124. PubMed ID: 17474111
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Revamp for NIH grants.
    Wadman M
    Nature; 2008 Feb; 451(7182):1035. PubMed ID: 18305502
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Biomedical research. Stimulus funding elicits a tidal wave of 'challenge grants'.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 2009 May; 324(5929):867. PubMed ID: 19443754
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. NINDS delves into drug development.
    Wickelgren I
    Science; 2002 Jul; 297(5579):180. PubMed ID: 12114605
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. It is apparent that there has been a paradigm shift in the evaluation and funding of research. Interview by Dr. Rae Silver.
    Mitler M
    Horm Behav; 2006 Jun; 50(1):169-70. PubMed ID: 16616751
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Most researchers favor NIH policy that requires less information, survey finds.
    Brainard J
    Chron High Educ; 2005 Aug; LI(49):A22. PubMed ID: 16302323
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. NIH: grants revamp needs grounding in evidence.
    Hannun YA
    Nature; 2008 Apr; 452(7189):811. PubMed ID: 18421328
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A metareview at the NIH.
    Nat Med; 2008 Apr; 14(4):351. PubMed ID: 18391922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Biomedical research. $300 million in private money for new investigators.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 2008 Mar; 319(5869):1469. PubMed ID: 18339907
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The time to demand funding.
    Mello CC; Walsh JV
    Science; 2009 Jan; 323(5911):208. PubMed ID: 19131609
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Data sharing: making headway in a competitive research milieu.
    Samson K
    Ann Neurol; 2008 Jul; 64(1):A13-6. PubMed ID: 18668610
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.