These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

382 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16470411)

  • 1. Estimating radiation-induced cancer risks at very low doses: rationale for using a linear no-threshold approach.
    Brenner DJ; Sachs RK
    Radiat Environ Biophys; 2006 Mar; 44(4):253-6. PubMed ID: 16470411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Two principal considerations are needed after low doses of ionizing radiation.
    Feinendegen LE; Paretzke H; Neumann RD
    Radiat Res; 2008 Feb; 169(2):247-8. PubMed ID: 18220467
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Economic and policy considerations drive the LNT debate.
    Mossman KL
    Radiat Res; 2008 Feb; 169(2):245; author reply 246-7. PubMed ID: 18220464
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Low-dose risk assessment.
    Tubiana M; Arengo A; Averbeck D; Masse R
    Radiat Res; 2007 Jun; 167(6):742-4; author reply 744. PubMed ID: 17523853
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Linear-no-threshold is a radiation-protection standard rather than a mechanistic effect model.
    Breckow J
    Radiat Environ Biophys; 2006 Mar; 44(4):257-60. PubMed ID: 16468065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Common sense about the linear no-threshold controversy-give the general public a break.
    Leonard BE
    Radiat Res; 2008 Feb; 169(2):245-6; author reply 246-7. PubMed ID: 18220465
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Recent reports on the effect of low doses of ionizing radiation and its dose-effect relationship.
    Tubiana M; Aurengo A; Averbeck D; Masse R
    Radiat Environ Biophys; 2006 Mar; 44(4):245-51. PubMed ID: 16468064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. On the estimation of radiation-induced cancer risks from very low doses of radiation and how to communicate these risks.
    Mattsson S; Nilsson M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jul; 165(1-4):17-21. PubMed ID: 25802468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Low-dose radiation risk extrapolation fallacy associated with the linear-no-threshold model.
    Scott BR
    Hum Exp Toxicol; 2008 Feb; 27(2):163-8. PubMed ID: 18480143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Risks associated with low doses and low dose rates of ionizing radiation: why linearity may be (almost) the best we can do.
    Little MP; Wakeford R; Tawn EJ; Bouffler SD; Berrington de Gonzalez A
    Radiology; 2009 Apr; 251(1):6-12. PubMed ID: 19332841
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The debate on the use of linear no threshold for assessing the effects of low doses.
    Tubiana M; Aurengo A; Averbeck D; Masse R
    J Radiol Prot; 2006 Sep; 26(3):317-24. PubMed ID: 16926474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. LNT: a never-ending story.
    Friedl AA; Rühm W
    Radiat Environ Biophys; 2006 Mar; 44(4):241-4. PubMed ID: 16468066
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Ionizing radiation].
    Masse R
    C R Acad Sci III; 2000 Jul; 323(7):633-40. PubMed ID: 10983274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. LNT--an apparent rather than a real controversy?
    Charles MW
    J Radiol Prot; 2006 Sep; 26(3):325-9. PubMed ID: 16926475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Extrapolating radiation-induced cancer risks from low doses to very low doses.
    Brenner DJ
    Health Phys; 2009 Nov; 97(5):505-9. PubMed ID: 19820460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The scientific basis for the use of the linear no-threshold (LNT) model at low doses and dose rates in radiological protection.
    Laurier D; Billarand Y; Klokov D; Leuraud K
    J Radiol Prot; 2023 Jun; 43(2):. PubMed ID: 37339605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The bell should toll for the linear no-threshold model.
    Higson DJ
    J Radiol Prot; 2004 Sep; 24(3):315-9. PubMed ID: 15511023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Does scientific evidence support a change from the LNT model for low-dose radiation risk extrapolation?
    Averbeck D
    Health Phys; 2009 Nov; 97(5):493-504. PubMed ID: 19820459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Biological Effects From Low Doses and Dose Rates of Ionizing Radiation: Science in the Service of Protecting Humans, a Synopsis.
    Feinendegen LE; Cuttler JM
    Health Phys; 2018 Jun; 114(6):623-626. PubMed ID: 29521814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Risk of lung cancer and leukemia from exposure to ionizing radiation and potential confounders among workers at the Portsmouth Naval Shipyard.
    Yiin JH; Schubauer-Berigan MK; Silver SR; Daniels RD; Kinnes GM; Zaebst DD; Couch JR; Kubale TL; Chen PH
    Radiat Res; 2005 Jun; 163(6):603-13. PubMed ID: 15913392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.